I looked at the video and the finger. I’m not sure there was a pinky ring. But that’s just me. I am not at all sure the eyebrows were manicured. Some people just have beautiful brows. And some men and women have beautiful curly lashes. I do agree it could be a neighbor but it would be tough to hide Nancy. Those homes are expensive in that area. So the only reason would be ransom and that is sort of ruled out. I still believe it was a grudge of some kind.
I just revisited these pictures.
Given how tight the gloves are, I agree that there either
1. isn't a ring (if it was on his pinky I think you would see more of the band through the tight plastic gloves) or
2. there's a ring on his right ring finger and what we're seeing in the security cam footage is the top right/corner of the ring, the side of which is blocked by the pinky
I can't imagine a perp taking enough care to put on a full-body disguise and not thinking to take a ring off, especially since non-wedding rings on a man may draw attention. If this is a ring the perp wore every day, it's likely that people in his life know that about him and, even if he disposes of it or stops wearing it, people would notice that it was gone.
If we're going the ring route, though, my guesses are
- family heirloom (probably a signet ring)
- college class ring (still a signet style)
- Oura ring, specifically one that's spun to the side (would be crazy to wear an oura ring while committing a crime, IMO)
- professional ring (like Canadian engineers - not sure if other fields have this as well)
I hope LE has a better grasp on this case than we do. It all seems so strange, and poor Nancy and her family are stuck in the middle of it.
MOO/JME