- Joined
- Sep 1, 2020
- Messages
- 404
- Reaction score
- 4,822
You're missing a lot of what I'm saying. I'm not making any blanket or definite proclamations either.A store with 5000+ locations in the US, that's hardly specific
I never suggested they were a pro, just someone spent more time on planning than I'd expect from a LD type criminal
What are you actually trying to get across with the holster bit? You're saying that someone experienced with firearms would buy a holster that doesn't fit the gun and carry it in a weird way on their waistband?
Overly convoluted =/= stupid. in fact, I'd argue that someone who thinks they're really clever would 'over convolute' things by over-engineering solutions for simple problems (your camera + spray paint point)
So in your theory that the perp isn't particularly clever or prepared for the crime, what's the explanation for the camera disconnecting at 01:47am as LE have stated, yet being back online around 02:12am to capture the porch footage and upload it to Google's servers?
That isn't some sort of 'gotcha' question either, it's something I'm genuinely interested in hearing explanations for
bbm Ya know, that's actually sad. I dont think more assets should have been utilized. Every organization has a mission, a vision and a protocol and procedures manual. More PUBLICITY? Yes. More assets???? Protocols, are protocols. All should be used on everyone. Reminds me of the line from Animal farm. All of the pigs in the barnyard are equal but some are more equal than others. JMOThat's a really excellent point. To borrow a phrase from my sister, he stomped on a hornet's nest when he took NG. Surely an experienced criminal, who specifically targeted her, would have expected a lot of attention on the case. The massive public interest. is more difficult to predict, but IF they knew who she was, they should have expected this to get more assets assigned to the case than if someone kidnapped me. MOO
ETA: MOO
I agree. What’s more, this crime was likely done by a psychopath. And psychopaths lie with such ease, they can easily deceive others watching and listening to them.Not a good idea, innocent or not. Folks will parse every word, analyze every bead of sweat, ensure every blink is in sync, and every otherwise autonomic movement dissected. I imagine we'll also see photoshops of him in a mask holding lantana, and superimposed over the porch guy. Helps the slow news cycle, but not his cause.
If innocent as he insists, he should've waited until a suspect is arrested before talking.
JMO.
Really strange that she wouldn't think any of it has to do with her son. Why would they be there then in her mind? Did she think they were just going door to door with search warrants?
JMO, I could accept that as a more robust theory if there had been a rash of violence or threats against numerous journalists and their families, or event journalists attacked. It would be very odd, in my view, to kidnap SG's mother at this point now that the cat is pretty far out of the bag.The Epstein stuff. Some people have posited that her covering the victims could be motivation for some sort of 'silencing' attempt from powerful entities.
I don't buy it myself but a lot of important people are implicated and could, in theory, be capable of that sort of thing
No. At least the one shown with agents inspecting was on the right side of the garage.The F.B.I keeps fumbling with the neighbors camera.I wonder if it faces NG’s garage/ driveway?
And a SWAT team? That would be alarming to anyone.Really strange that she wouldn't think any of it has to do with her son. Why would they be there then in her mind? Did she think they were just going door to door with search warrants?
I think that mugshot was from his 20's. I had seen an updated photo of him so I was curious as to why they would use that photo.LD looks totally different in that video to the mug shot, I was suspicious before but now I don’t think it’s him (not Lantana guy anyway)
I would agree, the SWAT aspect was over the top, since this was not going to be an arrest of a suspect.And a SWAT team? That would be alarming to anyone.
It feels like one of those cases where the public can’t settle on a convincing motive till the perp is identified, probably using technology.[…] Trying to figure out how (he) could have pulled this off calls for creative thinking on our part, but most of us can't even imagine the why of it.[…]
He's A BIT too old to be involved in the lifestyle and that of the one he was arrested with, that Kayla Day who had the fentyl and other drug. He had a gun, but I guess it's just fine there and that is because I thought he had prev charges other than the current ones. He looked like a 40 year old, which is GREAT if you are and I think he is .. I thought 20's anyway. Never too old to be involved in that lifestyle if a user and or dumbo though.I think that mugshot was from his 20's. I had seen an updated photo of him so I was curious as to why they would use that photo.
It gave the impression that he is younger than he is.
There is no evidence to suggest either way, but it seems unlikely that someone kidnapping a woman from her bed and making her disappear would carry a fake gun. Especially now that it's being treated as a homicide rather than a kidnapping. Below is a link to an AZ criminal defense attorney and, according to her, in general a fake gun makes very little difference.There's no evidence to suggest that 'the gun' wasn't an imitation. All looks real, but if he was aware that NG was elderly he knows she would be none the wiser as to whether it was authentic or not.
On the other hand, perhaps the person responsible wanted the publicity?That's a really excellent point. To borrow a phrase from my sister, he stomped on a hornet's nest when he took NG. Surely an experienced criminal, who specifically targeted her, would have expected a lot of attention on the case. The massive public interest. is more difficult to predict, but IF they knew who she was, they should have expected this to get more assets assigned to the case than if someone kidnapped me. MOO
ETA: MOO
Because, they dont want to be raked over the coals and subject themselves to scrutiny from online amateur sleuths, podcasters, and weirdos. They don't want people speculating that they are inserting themselves in a crime and for what reason? Because they can never be SURE they are right and then they will be defiled and mocked. They dont want their initials all over the internet. They are letting LE handle it. I can totally understand that! They are doing what is right for them and their family. JMOThis is so incredibly upsetting. How could someone knowing anything about this not crumble and help them. It just blows my mind that someone hasn’t caved and decided to do the right thing.
I agree. And having 400 agents assigned to this case??? I feel badly for all the other people with missing loved ones who get maybe 1 or 2 (maybe 5 or 6) people assigned to their case.bbm Ya know, that's actually sad. I dont think more assets should have been utilized. Every organization has a mission, a vision and a protocol and procedures manual. More PUBLICITY? Yes. More assets???? Protocols, are protocols. All should be used on everyone. Reminds me of the line from Animal farm. All of the pigs in the barnyard are equal but some are more equal than others. JMO
This is heart wrenching to watch. This poor family. Whoever took Miss Nancy is a true monster. Praying for a miracle, praying for this family.This is so incredibly upsetting. How could someone knowing anything about this not crumble and help them. It just blows my mind that someone hasn’t caved and decided to do the right thing.
Yeah, that was a really weird response. They'd break the door down to get into a room but "there really wasn't anything there." Was there not anything there or was there really not anything there?! WTH.Really strange that she wouldn't think any of it has to do with her son. Why would they be there then in her mind? Did she think they were just going door to door with search warrants?
I'm merely pointing out that 'the gun' might be a fake, not on the seriousness if it were fake or real, or any difference on how the law interprets or the implications that may follow.There is no evidence to suggest either way, but it seems unlikely that someone kidnapping a woman from her bed and making her disappear would carry a fake gun. Especially now that it's being treated as a homicide rather than a kidnapping. Below is a link to an AZ criminal defense attorney and, according to her, in general a fake gun makes very little difference.
![]()
Can I Be Charged with a Violent Crime if the Weapon Was Fake? - Janet Altschuler
In the heat of the moment, one person may pull out a fake, yet realistic-looking weapon in an attempt to scare another individual. Although you might think that brandishing a fake weapon is harmless, the law doesn’t share this point of view. In fact, a person can be charged with a violent crime...criminaldefensetucson.com
You don't need an expert, there's plenty of information on line. It's 'kind of straightforward'.Interesting. I Would love a body language expert interpretation.