ifindedout
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2022
- Messages
- 3,788
- Reaction score
- 17,053
RSBMand in other news, the camp has restored their website![]()
Though without the chatbot that was there before.
RSBMand in other news, the camp has restored their website![]()
bbmI think this is correct, but it's only part of the story. We live in a throwaway society whereby some parents abdicate the raising of their children to schools, coaches, psychiatric medications, and yes, groups like this that promise to make difficult children easier to deal with.
But (in MOO) that doesn't mean these camps should exist. There's a lot of money to be made in taking in the children of wealthy parents and straightening them out, via methods CHS would likely remove them from their home if parents were to try.
If you or I put our child in a sleeping environment so restrictive they had panic attacks or forced our children to wear clothing they soiled because we wouldn't give them bathroom breaks, we'd lose our children.
And that's what needs to happen to these camps. They need to lose the ability to enroll any children.
imo:MOO: This is a typical 100% cover-one's-bum statement carefully crafted by lawyers/reputation management professionals to cover every aspect of what the camp wants to project to parents and the public and probably covers every aspect of legal vulnerability.
...and one more thing. Did the camp have a handbook of best practices and protocols for staffers for all the difficult situations they were going to encounter and be expected to handle?
They're now offering parent and family tours.RSBM
Though without the chatbot that was there before.
some parents abdicate the raising of their children to schools, coaches, psychiatric medications, and yes, groups like this
I get where you're coming from--and there's a lot of truth to what you say about children benefitting from a strong role model.It does take a village to raise a child, though.
I know many children receiving special help at school, having a needed role model through their sports or hobbies, and taking medication for diagnoses like ADHD and anxiety. That isn't abdicating parenting; I just don't see anyone doing that. I think all of that is finding resources to help a child do well in life. What exactly are you seeing?
You can't raise a child by yourself. They only thrive when feeling an important part of a large community. But it has to be a safe and positive community.
Some people don't know where to find one. That's why these abusive camps shouldn't even be an option. It's shocking that for the cost, there aren't safe caring programs.
BBM. I don't understand why these camps are even legal.It does take a village to raise a child, though.
I know many children receiving special help at school, having a needed role model through their sports or hobbies, and taking medication for diagnoses like ADHD and anxiety. That isn't abdicating parenting; I just don't see anyone doing that. I think all of that is finding resources to help a child do well in life. What exactly are you seeing?
You can't raise a child by yourself. They only thrive when feeling an important part of a large community. But it has to be a safe and positive community.
Some people don't know where to find one. That's why these abusive camps shouldn't even be an option. It's shocking that for the cost, there aren't safe caring programs.
I absolutely agree. The comment on that article is super telling.Hmm. The comment under the article by an actual attendee holds much more weight with me, and yes, Mr Bloom, I have experienced, and still do, many of the things you mentioned. Would I send my child to Trails or anyplace like it? Over my dead body!.
* @MsMarple beat me to it!.
I don't get why the NC Health Dept. didn't wait until the investigation/autopsy into the 12 yr old boy's death is completed before they notified Trails about their violations and gave them the right to submit a "Plan of Correction".
IMO:
As it stands they remain clueless to what criminal activity may have taken place in and around his death.
BBM:IMO....
Speculating on reasons for a favorable relationship between an organization like Trails Carolina and a government entity might include:
Political Connections: There could be influential individuals or groups with ties to both Trails Carolina and the health department, leading to preferential treatment or support.
Financial Interests: There might be undisclosed financial arrangements or incentives involved, such as contracts, funding, or donations, that benefit both parties.
Regulatory Leniency: Trails Carolina may have leverage or influence that results in less stringent enforcement of regulations or oversight by the health department.
Confidential Agreements: There could be confidential agreements or understandings between Trails Carolina and the health department for reasons not publicly disclosed.
As always... if there are questions with no answers, follow the money.
IMO