NC NC - Faith Hedgepeth, 19, UNC student, Chapel Hill, 7 Sep 2012 #3

  • #761
This is a real side-note (I’ve always been curious about), but on off-chance someone here might know the answer I’ll ask:
Some hours before Faith’s murder there was an attempted (unsuccessful) rape/break-in in Carrboro — does anyone recall that and if it was ever solved (or remember any details about it)? At the time, police said they found no linkage between the 2 crimes, but I’ve just always wondered…
 
  • #762
This is a real side-note (I’ve always been curious about), but on off-chance someone here might know the answer I’ll ask:
Some hours before Faith’s murder there was an attempted (unsuccessful) rape/break-in in Carrboro — does anyone recall that and if it was ever solved (or remember any details about it)? At the time, police said they found no linkage between the 2 crimes, but I’ve just always wondered…
According to North Carolina court and prison records, the perpetrator in that case pleaded guilty. He was released on parole after serving his prison sentence. Interestingly, he was also a 19-year-old Guatemalan (mentioned in an earlier post on this thread) who broke in through an unlocked door.
 
  • #763
According to North Carolina court and prison records, the perpetrator in that case pleaded guilty. He was released on parole after serving his prison sentence. Interestingly, he was also a 19-year-old Guatemalan (mentioned in an earlier post on this thread) who broke in through an unlocked door.
Oh wow! thanks so much for this! even though I've apparently mis-remembered it as being a failed rape attempt... but what I was most wondering was whether or not he was Hispanic, and lo-and-behold, he's another Guatemalan! How bizarre is that! 2 violent rapes, rare in Carrboro & Chapel Hill, just hrs. apart the same morning....

p.s.... and thanks for the link back to our previous discussion here about it, I'd long forgotten.
 
  • #764
Oh wow! thanks so much for this! even though I've apparently mis-remembered it as being a failed rape attempt... but what I was most wondering was whether or not he was Hispanic, and lo-and-behold, he's another Guatemalan! How bizarre is that! 2 violent rapes, rare in Carrboro & Chapel Hill, just hrs. apart the same morning....

p.s.... and thanks for the link back to our previous discussion here about it, I'd long forgotten.
You're welcome! It's definitely crazy. It shows how there can be a lot of similarities between cases, but ultimately they're just coincidences.
 
  • #765
9/26/21 - Man charged in 2012 UNC Student Murder of Faith Hedgepeth

Miguel Enrique Salguero-Olivares, 28, remains in jail at Durham County without bond in connection to Hedgepeth's death.
[..]

"With him hanging out at the night club, that is not a Latino nightclub. There are going to be plenty of people who don't speak Spanish. He knows plenty of English, in my opinion," said Glass.
BBM...FWIW i do not believe there is evidence YET that MESO was in the club that night. This is an assumption by PI Glass. I'm very curious if it can be proven that he was and that was the connection!
 
  • #766
sorry, double posted
 
  • #767
BBM...FWIW i do not believe there is evidence YET that MESO was in the club that night. This is an assumption by PI Glass. I'm very curious if it can be proven that he was and that was the connection!
I'd honestly be pretty surprised if it turned out MESO was at Thrill that night, for a few reasons.
 
  • #768
Just adding that discovery includes more than just the police case file. It also includes expert witness reports, etc. So the discovery process continues beyond the exchange of the evidence collected by police and does not mean that the either side has withheld anything.
 
  • #769
This is a real side-note (I’ve always been curious about), but on off-chance someone here might know the answer I’ll ask:
Some hours before Faith’s murder there was an attempted (unsuccessful) rape/break-in in Carrboro — does anyone recall that and if it was ever solved (or remember any details about it)? At the time, police said they found no linkage between the 2 crimes, but I’ve just always wondered…
I am SO glad you are bringing that up! I actually got an alert today that he had been moved from jail. I didn’t realize this guy has been on parole. He is also Guatemalan. I don’t believe police have ever said one way or another if they were linked. If they have said anything it was only YEARS later. JMO
 
  • Like
Reactions: IDK
  • #770
I'd honestly be pretty surprised if it turned out MESO was at Thrill that night, for a few reasons.
I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out MESO was at Thrill that night…also for a few reasons.
 
  • #771
Also, my bad. Just catching up and didn’t realize I was responding to something you guys already discussed on Sunday. I bet he (AACR) got deported.
 
  • #772
I wouldn’t be surprised if it turned out MESO was at Thrill that night…also for a few reasons.
Early on I always felt the women’s presence in a bar-full of perhaps unsavory, drug or alcohol-induced patrons (some of whom may have been ‘rejected’ by the women), just hours before the murder, meant the killer likely came from there — so yeah I’d love to know if there is solid evidence of MESO’s presence there, and if so, who he hung with!? We’re operating in the dark here on so many things, and resorting to guessing games! :(

I do agree with what some have said, that it’s hard to explain the two high-powered law firms suddenly getting involved so late — if MESO can’t pay(?) it must be pro-bono, and what attorney (let alone 2 separate offices) takes on such a time-consuming case pro-bono unless they’re confident their client is innocent!? Strange....
 
  • #773
Early on I always felt the women’s presence in a bar-full of perhaps unsavory, drug or alcohol-induced patrons (some of whom may have been ‘rejected’ by the women), just hours before the murder, meant the killer likely came from there — so yeah I’d love to know if there is solid evidence of MESO’s presence there, and if so, who he hung with!? We’re operating in the dark here on so many things, and resorting to guessing games! :(

I do agree with what some have said, that it’s hard to explain the two high-powered law firms suddenly getting involved so late — if MESO can’t pay(?) it must be pro-bono, and what attorney (let alone 2 separate offices) takes on such a time-consuming case pro-bono unless they’re confident their client is innocent!? Strange....
From what I understand one of the attorneys is bilingual. I think it speaks volumes IF they are representing MESO pro bono. JMO
 
  • #774

1/16/25

UNC student Faith Hedgepeth murder case is one step closer to trial​

At the Homicide status hearing Attorneys for both sides told the Court they are in the process of finalizing discovery and ready to set the case for trial.

Take note that Discovery is not arbitrary but governed by NC Statute.

Reference: General Statute Sections - North Carolina General Assembly


Rule 12. Attorneys.

d) Duties of Defense Counsel.

4) Request/Motion for Discovery. In every felony case, as soon as feasible, an attorney shall file a request/motion that the prosecution provide the defense with all discovery that the defense is entitled to under all applicable statutes, case law, ethical provisions, and rules of court.

Rule 16. Discovery Between the State and Defense.

a) Policy. Discovery procedures prior to trial should: (1) promote a fair and expeditious resolution of the charges; (2) provide the defendant with sufficient information to make an informed plea; (3) permit adequate preparation for trial and minimize surprise at trial; (4) reduce interruptions and complications during trial and avoid unnecessary and repetitious trials; (5) minimize the procedural and substantive inequities among similarly situated defendants; (6) effect economies in time, money, judicial resources, and professional skills by minimizing paperwork, avoiding repetitious assertions of issues, and reducing the number of hearings; and(7) minimize the burden upon victims and witnesses. See Standard 11-1.1, ABA Standards for Criminal Justice: Discovery and Trial by Jury(3rd ed. 1996).

b) General. Except as otherwise provided in these local rules or applicable law, discovery shall be governed by Article 48 of Chapter 15A of the General Statutes. Article 48 applies to cases--felonies and misdemeanors--within the original jurisdiction of the superior court. G.S. §15A-901.

[..]

d) Defense Counsel.

1) Seeking Discovery. Within two weeks of appointment or appearance an attorney shall file and serve a written request that the prosecution voluntarily provide all discovery that the defense is entitled to under all applicable statutes, case law, and rules of court.

2) Responding to Discovery. The defendant or defense counsel shall promptly comply with any obligation to provide discovery to the prosecution as required by applicable law. See G.S. § 15A-905.

e) Prosecution.

1) Responding to Discovery. Upon receipt of such a request for voluntary discovery, the prosecution shall have 30 days to provide the requested discovery. Prior to responding to the request, the prosecution shall confer with others acting on the state’s behalf in the case in order to learn of discoverable information or material, including law enforcement officers. See Kyles v.Whitley, 514 U.S. 419(1995) (The individual prosecutor has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to others acting on the State’s behalf in the case, including the police.)

2) Seeking Discovery. When appropriate, the prosecution may seek discovery from the defendant pursuant to applicable law.

f) Law Enforcement. As soon as feasible law enforcement shall provide to the prosecution all information and material that is favorable to the defendant. Law enforcement shall likewise reduce to writing and so provide all statements attributed to the defendant.

g) Certificates of Disclosure.

1) Prosecution. Upon compliance with the defense’s request for voluntary discovery, the prosecution shall file and serve a certificate signed by a prosecutor attesting that he/she personally complied with these rules in furnishing to the defendant all information and materials that should be so provided pursuant to all applicable statutes, case law, and rules of court. The certificate shall further acknowledge the prosecutor’s continuing duty to supplement his/her prior disclosures.

2) Defense. When the defense has an obligation to provide discovery to the prosecution, upon compliance with such obligation defense counsel, or the defendant if unrepresented, shall file and serve a certificate signed by the person satisfying the obligation attesting that he/she personally complied with the obligation by furnishing to the prosecution all information and materials that should be so provided. The certificate shall further acknowledge any continuing duty to supplement his/her prior disclosures.

h) Continuing Duty of Disclosure. The prosecution and law enforcement are under a continuing duty to disclose as soon as feasible all appropriate information and materials learned or obtained by either. When appropriate, the defense is likewise under a continuing duty to disclose.

i) Orders of Discovery.

1) Defense. After filing and serving a request for voluntary discovery, upon a motion praying for such an order, the defense is entitled to an Order of Discovery requiring the prosecution to (i) permit the defense to view, examine, photograph and/or copy all physical evidence in the possession, custody or control of the State, including the prosecution and all law enforcement agencies involved in the investigation of the charges against the defendant; (ii) provide to the defense all information and materials discoverable pursuant to all applicable law, including statutes, caselaw, ethical provisions, and rules; and (iii) acknowledge the prosecution’s continuing duty to provide such discovery.

2) Prosecution. Under appropriate circumstances, the prosecution may obtain an Order of Discovery as authorized by law. See G.S. §15A-905.

j) Open File Policy. The defense may not rely on so-called “open file” policies of the prosecution. A defendant is not entitled to discovery of materials or information in the State’s possession unless the defense moves for an order of discovery. State v. Reeves, 343 N.C. 111,113(1996); State v. Abbott, 320 N.C. 475, 482(1987).
 
  • #775
From what I understand one of the attorneys is bilingual. I think it speaks volumes IF they are representing MESO pro bono. JMO
I doubt very much he is being represented pro bono.
 
  • #776
I doubt very much he is being represented pro bono.
The Olivares family certainly didn't seem to have the resources.... I wonder if after this amount of time they were able to scrape funds together from contacts in Guatemala??? or how else might they come upon the needed money; are there non-profit groups that would chip in on a case like this?
And "Prairiewind", since you're listed as an attorney, can you speculate on why MESO would have TWO separate law offices working the case? Are they splitting courtroom duties or is it more likely one is handling the trial, and the other doing something else?
 
  • #777
The Olivares family certainly didn't seem to have the resources.... I wonder if after this amount of time they were able to scrape funds together from contacts in Guatemala??? or how else might they come upon the needed money; are there non-profit groups that would chip in on a case like this?
And "Prairiewind", since you're listed as an attorney, can you speculate on why MESO would have TWO separate law offices working the case? Are they splitting courtroom duties or is it more likely one is handling the trial, and the other doing something else?
who are the current attorneys?
My comment about attorneys likely not being pro bono is based upon my experience. I have never seen a firm represent someone on a murder charge pro bono. A murder case is hundreds if not millions of dollars in fees and costs. Very few firms could do that. And why would they? I would suspect these lawyers are being paid by a third party.
 
  • #778
who are the current attorneys?
My comment about attorneys likely not being pro bono is based upon my experience. I have never seen a firm represent someone on a murder charge pro bono. A murder case is hundreds if not millions of dollars in fees and costs. Very few firms could do that. And why would they? I would suspect these lawyers are being paid by a third party.
The law firms of Chris Barnes, PLLC and Coleman, Merritt, Murphy and Rainsford, P.C. are retained as his attorneys. Thank you for your insight!
 
  • #779
I have never seen a firm represent someone on a murder charge pro bono. A murder case is hundreds if not millions of dollars in fees and costs. Very few firms could do that. And why would they? I would suspect these lawyers are being paid by a third party.
Very interesting. Thanks for your insight.
I wonder who would be paying them, though? And why...
 
  • #780
The law firms of Chris Barnes, PLLC and Coleman, Merritt, Murphy and Rainsford, P.C. are retained as his attorneys. Thank you for your insight!
Chris Barnes appears to be an immigration attorney. CMMR,PC is a good firm but it doesn't seem to have a lot of experience in this major felony/murder cases. But I think it is safe to assume they are being paid a full rate for their services. They are not a firm that could just pro bono a case like this.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
2,424
Total visitors
2,504

Forum statistics

Threads
632,163
Messages
18,622,928
Members
243,040
Latest member
#bringhomeBlaine
Back
Top