GUILTY NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #1

[Marshleon]

I was being sarcastic lol!

 

[wildebeest]

Marshleon---I know you were! :giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle::giggle:

 

[Deleted member 165489]

I believe Molly's attorneys want the social service records relating to the time the children were taken from her and before they left for Ireland. They were interviewed by social services and by the police so she probably wants to find out what the children said about events and their lives so they have plenty of time to wriggle out of any incriminating evidence IMO

 

[stmarysmead]

I believe Molly's attorneys want the social service records relating to the time the children were taken from her and before they left for Ireland. They were interviewed by social services and by the police so she probably wants to find out what the children said about events and their lives so they have plenty of time to wriggle out of any incriminating evidence IMO

This makes sense, especially since the records from Union County were also requested, and I don't believe Molly and Jason ever lived there together, did they?

The "concern" about witnesses being influenced or intimidated by FB posts....I believe they are referring to the children here too. It makes sense that her over-the-top posts to the kids were her attempt to influence them herself.

In my opinion, she fears their memories of her behavior.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Electric Sheep]

This makes sense, especially since the records from Union County were also requested, and I don't believe Molly and Jason ever lived there together, did they?

The "concern" about witnesses being influenced or intimidated by FB posts....I believe they are referring to the children here too. It makes sense that her over-the-top posts to the kids were her attempt to influence them herself.

In my opinion, she fears their memories of her behavior.

O Vu

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

I don't think Molly's lawyer was referring to Molly's Facebook posts. I think he was referring to the actions of some keyboard warriors who have been sending unsolicited email and social media messages regarding the investigation.

 

[Hotchips]

I don't think Molly's lawyer was referring to Molly's Facebook posts. I think he was referring to the actions of some keyboard warriors who have been sending unsolicited email and social media messages regarding the investigation.

I agree, the children would not have seen her posts as they are too young to access facebook and its highly unlikely they would even have been aware of them. mollys page was just for her, to bolster her public persona. one thing i always thought was she obviously never heard of the phrase that "self praise is no praise" when boasting of herself being a wonderful mother. However, People commenting in support of the corbett family need to be cautious of what was said yesterday especially when emotions are running high, it means they are taking note of what is being said and sent to people connected to molly. I did see posted recently that PMs were being sent to mollys friends and a screenshot of one such message was even posted publicly on a supporters public page (not the justice page) but was removed since. that page has now been privatised since yesterday.

 

[Electric Sheep]

However, People commenting in support of the corbett family need to be cautious of what was said yesterday especially when emotions are running high, it means they are taking note of what is being said and sent to people connected to molly. I did see posted recently that PMs were being sent to mollys friends and a screenshot of one such message was even posted publicly on a supporters public page (not the justice page) but was removed since. that page has now been privatised since yesterday.

I have a feeling that the social media and email strategy of the Corbett supporters is going to backfire big time. They may actually be unintentionally helping the defense.

 

[stmarysmead]

I am confused how any supporters of Molly's can be considered witnesses. Are they going to testify that they actually saw Jason abuse Molly? I don't think they can do much for her if they can only testify that is what she "said." In my opinion, Molly's credibility is pretty shaky...just because I might convince my friends that there is a family of Yeti regularly visiting my backyard, doesn't mean that is proof of their existence.

As to the Corbett family social media "strategy", I think every action has a reaction. Molly has been relentless in trying to make contact with those children. Imagine if you are trying to help your murdered brothers grieving children settle in to a new home, and one of the killers is persistent in trying to disrupt that? What could Molly have "done" for those children if they made contact....that wouldn't have made their lives sadder and harder? Cry and say she was trying to get them back? Give them "hope" that their lives will be disrupted again? Is that a way to help,them adjust?

She only thinks of herself as the "Mommy"...but she is also the murderer of their Father. For no matter the circumstances, she and her Father committed a rage killing on their Daddy. Molly and TM are going to argue that they were "entitled" to kill him. But that does not negate that they are responsible for these children losing their Dad, their home, their school friends, and yes, the killer they called Mommy.

Even if I were to accept their excuse, the autopsy shows rage and overkill. They were not just "stopping" Jason...they were beating him everywhere on his body...bat and brick. Beating him till he had no hope of survival.

Who is Molly Martens or Tom Martens to decide Jason deserved the death penalty?

The children do not need Molly or her family in their lives at this point. But the woman, the admitted killer, has been relentless. In return, she has agitated those who support the Corbetts...by her refusal to act with dignity and put the children's transition and grief FIRST.

If she had beaten their dog to death this way...one would still expect her to put the trauma of the children before herself!

I noticed on Instagram, she even put a picture of the children with their "loving" grandfather...I.e. her co-killer. I wonder just how much sense Molly has or is she trying to be provocative? Using the dog analogy again, if your dog mauled your neighbors child to death, would you post to an open account a picture of that dog and ooze how "loving" he is?

Molly is either extremely cruel or extremely self-involved. I think HER social media presence will backfire big time. This is my reaction and my opinion only.




My opinion only.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[stephanddoody]

I am confused how any supporters of Molly's can be considered witnesses. Are they going to testify that they actually saw Jason abuse Molly? I don't think they can do much for her if they can only testify that is what she "said." In my opinion, Molly's credibility is pretty shaky...just because I might convince my friends that there is a family of Yeti regularly visiting my backyard, doesn't mean that is proof of their existence.

As to the Corbett family social media "strategy", I think every action has a reaction. Molly has been relentless in trying to make contact with those children. Imagine if you are trying to help your murdered brothers grieving children settle in to a new home, and one of the killers is persistent in trying to disrupt that? What could Molly have "done" for those children if they made contact....that wouldn't have made their lives sadder and harder? Cry and say she was trying to get them back? Give them "hope" that their lives will be disrupted again? Is that a way to help,them adjust?

She only thinks of herself as the "Mommy"...but she is also the murderer of their Father. For no matter the circumstances, she and her Father committed a rage killing on their Daddy. Molly and TM are going to argue that they were "entitled" to kill him. But that does not negate that they are responsible for these children losing their Dad, their home, their school friends, and yes, the killer they called Mommy.

Even if I were to accept their excuse, the autopsy shows rage and overkill. They were not just "stopping" Jason...they were beating him everywhere on his body...bat and brick. Beating him till he had no hope of survival.

Who is Molly Martens or Tom Martens to decide Jason deserved the death penalty?

The children do not need Molly or her family in their lives at this point. But the woman, the admitted killer, has been relentless. In return, she has agitated those who support the Corbetts...by her refusal to act with dignity and put the children's transition and grief FIRST.

If she had beaten their dog to death this way...one would still expect her to put the trauma of the children before herself!

I noticed on Instagram, she even put a picture of the children with their "loving" grandfather...I.e. her co-killer. I wonder just how much sense Molly has or is she trying to be provocative? Using the dog analogy again, if your dog mauled your neighbors child to death, would you post to an open account a picture of that dog and ooze how "loving" he is?

Molly is either extremely cruel or extremely self-involved. I think HER social media presence will backfire big time. This is my reaction and my opinion only.




My opinion only.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

My thoughts exactly
The Corbetts themselves have not been involved in any messaging campaign either by email or social media. In fact I'm surprised they have been able to bite their tongues with some of the things that has been said about them. You will always will have people that go overboard the Corbetts don't control these people as far as I know they actually don't know them ,they have asked for it to stop and weren't listened to. I know the appreciate the positive support a lot more than the negative you can't blame them for the actions others take and in my opinion Molly and some members of her family have invited a lot of it on themselves not all of them . Giving your email address and phone number and inviting people to look at your facebook page and comment on your instagram account is asking for trouble of course it will be abused. Molly herself is makimg serious allegations regarding the reason Jasons family wanted the children to be in their care, the care they are been given any even suggesting that the are being coached to say things about her. I understand that some peoples actions were out of order and I don't condone threatening anybody and neither do the Corbetts but when they don't listen what are they to do? If even part of Mollys defence is cyber bullying I wish her the best of luck because she will need it . This "cyber bullying" happened after Jason was murdered so I wouldn't say she has a hope in hell of using that
My own opinion

 

[Electric Sheep]

If you don't know the Corbett how do you know what they do or don't condone?

 

[stephanddoody]

If you don't know the Corbett how do you know what they do or don't condone?

I know you like facts as you have stated so before so here are the facts as I know them but I am open to correction as I am not always right ;-)
They publicly asked for people to refrain from posting on the jfj page in a negative manner, they publicly stated they can't be made responsible for peoples personal pages , they have publicly stated they can't be responsible for peoples opinions and interpretations, they publicly asked for people not to send emails, they do not interact with the people who are doing these postings or threatening behaviour , there has never been posts by either Molly or anybody who supports her with threatening messages or emails directly from any member of the Corbett family which I'm sure they would have loved to display if there was. This would lead me believe that they wouldn't condone that behaviour.

 

[Electric Sheep]

Do you have a link to these public statements?

 

[stmarysmead]

If you don't know the Corbett how do you know what they do or don't condone?

Their "official" posts from the family on their FB are all they can reasonably be held accountable for. There have been no threats in those comments and no incitement. They have no more control over what people do or say on the Internet than WS does beyond this site.

They are grieving their loved one who died a heinous death. In his will, he asked them to care for his children and they have taken on that responsibility.

Molly wants only to think of herself as Mommy but she is also the murderer of the children's Father and the Corbetts loved one.

She just is. Those children were not removed after Jason died in a car crash, but if one only read her FB, that would be easy to believe. Poor pitiful Molly...how quick to forget the horror of what she and her Father did.

If she had the moral compass to leave those children alone and stop inciting others with her Pity Party...much would have been avoided.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[stephanddoody]

Do you have a link to these public statements?

Yes I will find it now

 

[stmarysmead]

Do you have a link to these public statements?

Their FB is open. Google "Justice for Jason" on Facebook.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[stephanddoody]

https://www.facebook.com/BringJacka...0.1455216461./198648033802612/?type=3&theater
This is one of the statements,others are comments written under posts requesting emails to be written. I know that I have seen them but I will not go through the effort to find them. Im not sure what point you are trying to get across. Do you not believe that the Corbetts have good intentions? Do you believe them to ulterior motive for wanting justice? Why do you think they are involved in threatening behaviour and email and social media campaigns? Have you got evidence they have been ? I said I am open to correction and if you do have evidence if so I would like to see it. I firmly believe the only victims in this are Jasons children and family and I thought thats what everyone was here for . To try and help find something that may have been missed.We have all been presented with the same evidence and facts. The Corbett family didn't kill Jason . They are not being charged with murder . They have done nothing wrong as far as I am aware and will not be charged with any crimes. Why all the focus on what they do on social media or who they send an email to. They are responsible for their own pages and their own only.

 

[stephanddoody]

I didn't presume I asked questions about what you think. I agree that their behaviour wasn't appropriate. I told you the Corbetts don't condone threatening behaviour and can't be responsible for independent opinions or personal pages you asked for a link I gave you one , others have been removed from the page because they don't want negativity on the page and they also don't want emails being sent to potential witnesses all they want is justice for Jason . The good supporters that just want truth and justice far outweighs the supporters that engage in threatening behaviour. You said yourself some supporters not all .

 

[Hotchips]

I think the witnesses referred to are possibly the people who attended the gathering at their home the previous day, and mollys friends and acquaintances whom she would have had contact with regularly through the swimming club and the children's activities and playdates. These people would have interacted with her on an almost daily basis and we don't know what they have seen or heard or taking mollys word for it over the years as they are staying very tight lipped in the public arena. I saw that a few stated at various times said hey were sending emails to her friends employers. This was raised in terms of the kids photos lately which is fair enough, they should not have been displaying them however previous to this emails were being sent to employers saying they shouldnt employ someone who is friends with a murderer which i personally think is a step too far but my personal views dont matter in terms of this forum. The PMs and screenshot I referred to earlier was very clearly trying to elicit information of what the defence had from a friend of hers with a couple of insults thrown in for good measure. The friend said she was not engaging in the conversation nor going to give information and she was not going to stop her support of molly and to stop contacting her. This could be seen as interfering with potential witnesses. The social media aspect also covers the commentary left under news reports on Facebook. I agree the Corbett family have no control over this nor comment publicly themselves and this is commendable given the circumstances of jasons death. It's a shame there are still some that continue. Other witnesses I'd say will be the earnest family whose testimony wont hold any weight to be honest due to their actions in the immediate aftermath. I'm sure me information will come to light in April which I believe is another administration hearing. By then tom martens file will have been released so it will be interesting to see what comes out of that.

 

[stmarysmead]

Let me point out that WS has a great feature...it's the "ignore option." Just access it in your settings and you can "ignore" any poster that is disrupting the thread. You will then see other posts, but never theirs.

I am no newbie. I'll just add that the request for "proof" and "links" go both ways. Has there been any proof that the Corbetts are running a negative social media campaign that will therefore backfire? I have not seen links to back that assertion.

Therefore until we do, I think we are being asked to disprove something that has been stated with no substantiation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Electric Sheep]

Let me point out that WS has a great feature...it's the "ignore option." Just access it in your settings and you can "ignore" any poster that is disrupting the thread. You will then see other posts, but never theirs.

I am no newbie. I'll just add that the request for "proof" and "links" go both ways. Has there been any proof that the Corbetts are running a negative social media campaign that will therefore backfire? I have not seen links to back that assertion.

Therefore until we do, I think we are being asked to disprove something that has been stated with no substantiation.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

You did not see it because no one said they were.