GUILTY NC - Jason Corbett, 39, murdered in his Wallburg home, 2 Aug 2015 #7

[stephanddoody]

[video=twitter;892091555477159936]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/892091555477159936[/video]


No prints WHAT

 

[Triona]

So no latent prints found on bat. I wonder was it cleaned of prints?

Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

 

[Be true]

[video=twitter;892091555477159936]https://twitter.com/bobcostner/status/892091555477159936[/video]


No prints WHAT

Ah here. This is the pits. How is there no prints.

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

 

[kittythehare]

Ah here. This is the pits. How is there no prints.

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

somebody must have gone into a dusting flurry or the bat was never used are the only conclusions I can guess at?

 

[stmarysmead]

All the Americans are doing that. They are being highly selective on what they are reporting. It's actually starting to get incredibly annoying and feels like they are trying to manipulate the public.

Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

Many of us call it Fake News. Luckily we are now mostly aware of the tactics. Please consider when you watch and believe our International news.

 

[stmarysmead]

Ah here. This is the pits. How is there no prints.

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

No, this is good news for the Prosecution. Consider the story. We called 911 right after he fell..then we were giving CPR or having a nervous breakdown. Tom's prints should be there and they should be strong from his grip. Think about how tightly he would have held that bat. And he admitted to the killing...why wipe the bat?

Because MM prints were on it.

This goes directly to coverup! Great score for Prosecution.

 

[SandyQLS]

I'm following it on twitter stephan and will pop in and out here where possible.

Thank you. I am probably not the only one who cannot read the video-twitter posts, but I can read the others. Any synopsis or observations are much appreciated.

 

[Be true]

No, this is good news for the Prosecution. Consider the story. We called 911 right after he fell..then we were giving CPR or having a nervous breakdown. Tom's prints should be there and they should be strong from his grip. Think about how tightly he would have held that bat. And he admitted to the killing...why wipe the bat?

Because MM prints were on it.

This goes directly to coverup! Great score for Prosecution.

Well when you put it that way..........

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

 

[Be true]

somebody must have gone into a dusting flurry or the bat was never used are the only conclusions I can guess at?

I assume it will be more difficult to lift prints from stone kitty?

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

 

[Triona]

No, this is good news for the Prosecution. Consider the story. We called 911 right after he fell..then we were giving CPR or having a nervous breakdown. Tom's prints should be there and they should be strong from his grip. Think about how tightly he would have held that bat. And he admitted to the killing...why wipe the bat?

Because MM prints were on it.

This goes directly to coverup! Great score for Prosecution.

That's what I thought too.

Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

 

[Frizby]

Ah here. This is the pits. How is there no prints.

Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk

So no prints on the weapon that TM claims he used. Not even prints from buying it, from the sales person in the shop (if he indeed did buy it prior to visiting), from carrying it into the house. Well well, there is a twist.

 

[kittythehare]

Thank you. I am probably not the only one who cannot read the video-twitter posts, but I can read the others. Any synopsis or observations are much appreciated.

much selective and conflicting rportage from 2 US media sources.. both inexperienced, both possibly heavily biased in favour of defence.
Only bombshell is that bat allegedly used by TM was clear of prints.
If accurate, thats a megabiggie.

 

[stmarysmead]

This was the killers first big mistake. You supposedly didn't want to kill the man...so your first thought is get help, do CPR. Tom's prints should have been all over the bat...he confessed.

But they took time to wipe the bat. Not to erase Tom's prints. They SHOULD be there.

Mollys!

 

[Logic-lady]

[video=twitter;892100058417700864]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/892100058417700864[/video]

Who else's hair could it be...the other's had NO reported injuries!!

 

[Logic-lady]

[video=twitter;892099758696910849]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/892099758696910849[/video]

25 hairs from when Molly 'tried' to hit him with the paver, but missed??!

 

[Frizby]

No, this is good news for the Prosecution. Consider the story. We called 911 right after he fell..then we were giving CPR or having a nervous breakdown. Tom's prints should be there and they should be strong from his grip. Think about how tightly he would have held that bat. And he admitted to the killing...why wipe the bat?

Because MM prints were on it.

This goes directly to coverup! Great score for Prosecution.

And didn't them claim that Jason got hold of the bat? If so, then his prints should be on it.

 

[stmarysmead]

[video=twitter;892100058417700864]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/892100058417700864[/video]

Who else's hair could it be...the other's had NO reported injuries!!

Defense razzle dazzle.

 

[stmarysmead]

And didn't them claim that Jason got hold of the bat? If so, then his prints should be on it.

YES!!!!!! Fantastic point!

 

[fido]

And didn't them claim that Jason got hold of the bat? If so, then his prints should be on it.

excellent point

 

[Logic-lady]

[video=twitter;892103937008033793]https://twitter.com/LexDispatchBC/status/892103937008033793[/video]

Did they take samples of Sharon's hair I wonder?