- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 20,089
- Reaction score
- 55,554
Uh... why is the judge questioning JW?
Glad you get it, sea-chiq! It's the "Harbison" rule that is driving this biznezz for the DT and the Judge.
Uh... why is the judge questioning JW?
If he's found guilty of rape then felony murder rule applies and he would be convicted of first degree murder under that statute:
Felony Murder Rule - States that any death which occurs during the commission or attempt to commit certain felonies, which include arson, rape or other sexual offenses, burglary, robbery or kidnapping, is first-degree murder and all participants in the felony can be held equally culpable, including those who did no harm, had no weapon, and did not intend to hurt anyone. Intent does not have to be proved for anything but the underlying felony. Even if, during the commission of the underlying felony, death occurs from fright -- a heart attack for instance, it is still first-degree murder.
That's the tricky thing about Jason. I lived right next to him (when he wasn't taking his medication and was drinking/doing drugs regularly,) saw him almost everyday and I never, ever suspected him. I was totally shocked when he was arrested him. In fact, the day he was arrested, I even asked one of the detectives if they were sure they had the right guy....
I don't see how this ends up with anything less than felony murder. He raped her and he killed her in conjunction with the commission of the rape. That's felony murder which is first degree murder.
Am I missing something? They admit it - what's the open question? I'm confused!
Glad you get it, sea-chiq! It's the "Harbison" rule that is driving this biznezz for the DT and the Judge.
Well, I was watching full screen during the time JW was answering JG. I have to tell you, I was creeped out because (to me) he seemed pretty normal and quite lucid. It was kinda scary. JY and BC gave me the willies, and I took some comfort in thinking my weirdo-dar would have gone off if I had crossed paths with either of them. However, Iadidn't really get that feeling from JW. Am I slipping?
Even a broken clock is right twice a day, which means even JW can appear normal at times.
Also consider that
A. He's on lithium
B. He's not on any other recreational drugs
C. He's not drunk
D. He's been bathed and cleaned up and is dressed nicely.
E. He is lucid (except for when he affects that catatonic state when the jury is present)
And also, he's not doing much more than saying, "yes sir, no sir."
Wow -- what a story!! Your poor but lucky student!
Do you know where your student lived at the time of the break-in? I would love to get a feel for JW's "territory." Just how far did he roam?
And your remarks on JW's probable preference for graphic novels makes good sense, no1 -- lotsa pictures, few words. Some of those pics in those books don't need words... Did his folks think they were delivering Archie comics or what??
No pressure, no pressure... It's all true, though.
I do feel good that I fessed up to you cuz I was worried a little "boredom" might slip out. Now you'll know it was just a brain fart. Can I say brain fart?
You know what, I felt sad too. He seemed like a nice guy. So sad these people who spiral totally out of control just can't see what's coming for themselves down the road a bit.
Yeah, kinda hard to defend that "just wanted to break in, stroll around, take nothing, and feel empowered" argument, right? Between the TV, the rock and the CAR in the driveway, I think you have to really suspend disbelief on that whole deal.
OMG, I am ROFL over this. I kept wondering "what's up with this 'harvesting hearing'?"
My student lives off of Ridge Road, which is probably within 2 miles from here, I'd say.
Hence they have to get JW to swear in court he understands what his attorneys are doing and agrees with and gives permission and he hasn't been threatened or promised anything as a result. That will exclude JW's appellate attorneys from using the Harbison case ruling in the future, in trying to plead "ineffective counsel" as one of their strategies. Of course, appellate attorneys may come up with other reasons to plead "ineffectual counsel," but this one tactic won't be one of them.the North Carolina Supreme Court held that when defense counsel admits the defendant’s guilt to the jury without the defendant’s consent per se ineffective assistance of counsel occurs.
Amen, Sistah! We can always work in banter... We'll make it fit, don't git in a snit!
I would really like to raise a glass (of Pepsi, speaking fer myself only) or two with whoever could, at the good ol' Glenwood Grill after this trial is over -- if we can find enuff of us to sit around a table. I don't wanna drink alone. It's an intimate little place, good food (not just burgers & vegetarians are welcome), quiet, casual (jeans, shorts or a suit), clean, great service, reasonable prices, and not hard to find. Just think about it, peeps...![]()
Is it possible to commit suicide by overdosing on lithium? Not sure JW is going to make it in prison.
There were a couple times I saw BC looking at me in the courtroom and yes, it creeped me out. Eyes cold and dark, like a shark.