NC NC - Madalina Cojocari, 11, reported Missing Dec 2022 three Weeks After Last Seen, Cornelius, *Parents Arrested* #3

  • #581
I think that much or even most of his testimony could be true---but I am not buying ALL of it.

I am still doubting that he never realised the child was missing. He even admitted a few times that he knew his wife was lying about her being in her room. So it makes me wonder why he just went along with it.

Also, I do believe him when he says his wife was nutty and borderline crazy. But I also wonder if he is exaggerating somethings to maker her look clinically insane---to get him off the hook.

But he admits seeing the child's trundle bed being partially burned---and her photos being burned. How could a grown man, with a skilled technical job and a security clearance ignore things like that, when he hasn't seen his stepdaughter for weeks? It doesn't pass the smell test for me. Smells very fishy.

I don't think he harmed this child---and back at the start of this case I thought he was the abusive one and that his wife was afraid of him and shipped her child to safety somewhere.

I no longer believe that. I don't think he was the aggressor---but I do think there's a chance that he looked the other way when he saw his wife acting aggressively, and maybe even helped herr w/a coverup?
I think there's a difference though between him suspecting Madalina wasn't actually in the house, and that DC was lying about her being in her room, or in the bathroom... and Madalina being MISSING, missing. If that makes sense. I don't think it was until later that he realized she really was MISSING, just as he testified to. In other words, I think he was making excuses for DC (to himself) because he really didn't believe she'd do anything to make Madalina go missing.

I also don't think he helped her with any type of coverup. If evidence comes to light that indicates that he did, then of course I'll change my mind but so far, I haven't seen anything to point that direction (other than my jaded opinion after following true crime for so long).

jmo
 
  • #582
I wish she had been called to the stand. I'd love to hear her being questioned about these accusations he made. Darn.
Keeping in mind it wasn't just CP's accusations. Both his brother and his college pal essentially said the same sort of things about her. My guess is, she would have put on the helpless, defenseless immigrant act, and denied everything every witness said about her, casting some doubt in the eyes of the jury. It really would have been her only move, considering no one had anything good to say about her, and even she herself plead guilty to not reporting Madalina missing.

jmo
 
  • #583
  • #584
  • #585
  • #586
Does CP have Stockholm Syndrome with DC the demented abuser and controller in this family? Is that what the defense testimony has suggested?
 
  • #587
  • #588
  • #589
  • #590

0:05 a.m.
Closing arguments begin with Palmiter's defense addressing the jury. Palmiter's defense says the "main thing" in the case is finding Madalina.

"Finding Maddie takes precedence over everything, but this case isn't about that. This case is about whether Christopher Palmiter knew she was missing. That's what he's charged with. He said he really didn't know," Palmiter's attorney says.

10:11 a.m.
Roseman tells the jury that Diana Cojocari planned to hide Madalina "months and months" before Palmiter realized she was gone. He claims Diana had a lot of concerns and fears.

"You heard the state say Palmiter was her father," Roseman said. "Yes, Palmiter wanted to be her father. He loved her, and he wants her back. He just doesn't know where she is. Diana never told him."

Roseman reiterates the couple didn't have "normal" communication, telling the jury that Diana "wore the pants in the house" and controlled what the family did, alleging she was abusive of Palmiter during their relationship.

10:18 a.m.
Roseman says Palmiter's memory is "horrible," telling the jury he has to take pictures of everything with his phone to remember. Roseman says Palmier's phone is proof he's telling the truth about what happened.

"The sad thing about this whole case is Maddie's still missing and we're having to argue about this situation and it makes us look like we're indifferent to Maddie being gone but we're not," Roseman said. "He didn't have anything to do with Diana's plan."

Roseman also mentions the picture Palmiter took of Diana's note that said "gone for two days."
 
  • #591
Does defense want jury to believe DC exerted total control over CP, manipulating his emotions, thoughts, and actions?
 
  • #592
  • #593
Emma Mondo
He used an analogy to describe Palmiter as a frog in boiling water.

The defense claims that the audio recordings were a way of setting Palmiter up
 
  • #594
  • #595
  • #596
  • #597
Emma Mondo
The Defense is spending a good bit of time touching of evidence that was presented again as he's pacing back and forth in front of the jury.


10:27 a.m.
"You have to put yourself in Chris' shoes," Roseman said to the jury.

He continues, saying Diana set him up with secret recordings and included Madalina's name in the conversation. Roseman says Diana was gaslighting her husband into believing Madalina was with her, including trips to the mountains.

"He knows he loves Madalina," Roseman said. "He knows Diana would not hurt Madalina, so what would he think? He would think that Madalina is in the care of her mother."
 
  • #598
If DC gaslighted CP into believing Madalina was at home, had he lost all sense of logic and reasoning abilities?
I suspect, as is generally the case in a gaslighting situation, CP allowed the lines to blur when it came to DC and whatever she said, or wanted.
 
  • #599
JMO...Sounds like Palmiter's attorney is putting on a strong defense.
 
  • #600

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
113
Guests online
2,745
Total visitors
2,858

Forum statistics

Threads
632,513
Messages
18,627,834
Members
243,174
Latest member
daydoo93
Back
Top