- Joined
- Jan 2, 2017
- Messages
- 539
- Reaction score
- 6,464
I just can’t understand how she was able to live off the grid for 24 years. Did she work? Did she ever go to the doctor? Fake ID and fake name?
And so close… What about her car? Renewing registration, etc. Wonder if she had help like that woman from Kentucky that was found not long ago.I just can’t understand how she was able to live off the grid for 24 years. Did she work? Did she ever go to the doctor? Fake ID and fake name?
Surely she didn't run away from her family just to hide from a DWI charge?!
Who knows? She may have.
Here's a story from a local (to her) news station. I realize mugshots are not meant to be photogenic, but she looks like she's had a hard life in the meantime.
OOPS, WRONG LINK!
It appears to be a glamour shot, they were very popular in the 90's, and they came with with a full face of make up and over the top hair, not necessarily the day to day hair and make up a person would normally have.I wonder if the photo on the left might have been taken some time earlier than 2001. It appears as though she is showing off her engagement ring.
If the photo on the left was taken earlier than the time of her disappearance, then perhaps the one on the right is just showing a picture of the woman who is now thirty or forty years older.
It's interesting that you describe that as a "glamour shot", as in the UK "glamour" photography was essentially boudoir material - women in sexy lingerie draped across beds and chaises longues and pouting at the camera.It appears to be a glamour shot, they were very popular in the 90's, and they came with with a full face of make up and over the top hair, not necessarily the day to day hair and make up a person would normally have.
Super interesting. We have those here in the US too. As a child of the 80's nearly everyone I knew had a glamour shot with teased hair, full eye liner and a jean jacket off the shoulder, I think I had a every intention of getting one when I was older but they seemed to be less trendy or cool when I got old enough. I googled it and got this answer, hope it helps!It's interesting that you describe that as a "glamour shot", as in the UK "glamour" photography was essentially boudoir material - women in sexy lingerie draped across beds and chaises longues and pouting at the camera.
It looked like some version of a Glamour Shot, which were very popular in the 1990s. Most likely, it was also the picture the family released to the press when she went missing.I wonder if the photo on the left might have been taken some time earlier than 2001. It appears as though she is showing off her engagement ring.
If the photo on the left was taken earlier than the time of her disappearance, then perhaps the one on the right is just showing a picture of the woman who is now thirty or forty years older.
Thanks - this is interesting from a cultural differences point of view. As someone who was involved in photography and a member of a number of camera clubs in the 1980s and 1990s, I really don't recall anything similar to the specific outlets in shopping malls/centres to what you describe. What you're describing sounds like the sort of portrait photography that many UK high street professional photo studios would offer, especially if they also did a lot of wedding photography. The main portrait aesthetics in the UK at that time were either big-hair-disco-glitter-blue-eyeshadow or Laura-Ashley-country-house-horses-and-wellies-rural-idyll rather than a film or Hollywood inspiration.Super interesting. We have those here in the US too. As a child of the 80's nearly everyone I knew had a glamour shot with teased hair, full eye liner and a jean jacket off the shoulder, I think I had a every intention of getting one when I was older but they seemed to be less trendy or cool when I got old enough. I googled it and got this answer, hope it helps!
"Glamour Shots in the 1990s were a massive, mall-based cultural phenomenon offering makeovers and professional photoshoots to make everyday people feel like celebrities. Known for, high-volume hair, heavy makeup, and props like hats or pearls, these, sessions often created a "cringe-worthy" yet nostalgic look, characterized by feathered hair and soft-focus lenses.
I was thinking the same thing. It’s a shame that some are smearing the father‘s name, when the issues could have very well been hers. The children have stood by their father, and I think that says a lot.JMOPure speculation.
Maybe she left because the "domestic issues" were her drinking. She didn't want to expose her children to growing up with an alcoholic. Getting fired for drinking on the job is not the sign of a healthy stable person, imo.
I'm wondering if the "domestic issues" were based on her possible drinking problem (DUI, alleged firing from job for drinking) and she felt that the kids were better off without her around. Maybe in her mind she was protecting them by leaving. I can absolutely see that someone with potential alcoholism and guilt from that could convince themselves that this was the best solution for everyone. Huge speculation on my part, but thoughts like, "Everyone would be better off if I wasn't around" can be strong enough to make people do things that aren't rational to those of us without those thoughts. IMO MOO
I’m trying to wrap my head around the fact that she never ran into anyone she knew!She was only 2 1/2 hours away from where she left! Wow!
I have to vote with @fsngruv on this one. This is a typical glamor shot from the US in that era. Everyone I knew had one, including me lol.It's interesting that you describe that as a "glamour shot", as in the UK "glamour" photography was essentially boudoir material - women in sexy lingerie draped across beds and chaises longues and pouting at the camera.