So far the most updated coverage is fayobserver.com, but lots of media is there.
I'd be OK with 65 years. Then eternity burning the fat off.
I'd be OK with 65 years. Then eternity burning the fat off.
Sadly, we all knew or should have known this argument was coming. I think one of our members here even suggested this could be used in Antoinette's defense.
If MAM was guilty of kidnap, AD's attorney's argue that she cannot be guilty of trafficking.
They argue you cannot have it both ways. They argue that Shaniya was either given, sold, traded or she was kidnapped but not both. And since MAM has already been found guilty of kidnap then how could AD have trafficked her.
I will be watching to see what happens with this ruling.
Should we start a new thread for Antoinette (Antoniette -- which?) in Trials for this separate case which, I guess, is still scheduled for October 28, 2013? I'll be glad to do it.
Mods - what think ye?
Thanks.
I think its a good idea!
Ima