So do you think AB is talking??
I do. Maybe not complete sense, so to speak, but I think he is starting to give some info.
IIRC they took her bed from the house. Plus the two bags of evidence.
So do you think AB is talking??
Another thing that struck me was the statement that they have not found Zahra's body. And dont expect to in the landfill. Which implies something intact. They may have found some remains...not a complete set.
![]()
Don't forget the sheet, two pillows and comforter they took from one of the vehicles.
JMO but I just don't think they have found ANY part of her body as yet....that would be SO huge.....they would surely state it was so before the media could accidentally get wind of it and start rumors.......indisputable proof that she IS dead....by them saying they've not found her body...I just don't think they'd state that if they'd found even PART of her at all. Poor dear precious little Zahra...it is horrendous to even have to think of her little body being in "parts".....SHEESH this case is simply HIDEOUS in so many ways :-((((((((
Prayers go out to those searchers, I can't imagine how awful it has got to be to have to search an area like that. Bless them for their tenacity. I am in awe of their devotion to this beautiful child.
So do you think AB is talking??
I dont dispute this-BUT there are criteria to determine someone is dead. What if they found some hair and a fingernail, for example. Than it would be tough to conclude that someone was deceased because anyone could survive a lost fingernail and some lost hair.
If they found, God Forbid, brain matter, well then it is a slam dunk because you really cant live without your brain. Or heart, or liver...you get what I am saying.
If it's true EB received $10k from someone in the UK she'd met online, what was that money for? Is it related to Zahra's disappearance? Could she have been handed over to someone for the cash? If so, a discarded computer or hard drive in the landfill might show the conversations and arrangements made with this other person and lead to a timeline and some answers.
Just tossing it out there...haven't really thought it through yet.
Which could mean that they found fragments that are Zahra, thanks to the woodchipper, and would explain why they aren't looking for her body. It could also mean that they want to nail down the timeline so they have proof that AB was involved.
I dont dispute this-BUT there are criteria to determine someone is dead. What if they found some hair and a fingernail, for example. Than it would be tough to conclude that someone was deceased because anyone could survive a lost fingernail and some lost hair.
If they found, God Forbid, brain matter, well then it is a slam dunk because you really cant live without your brain. Or heart, or liver...you get what I am saying.
Which could mean that they found fragments that are Zahra, thanks to the woodchipper, and would explain why they aren't looking for her body. It could also mean that they want to nail down the timeline so they have proof that AB was involved.
I thought the woodchipper had been ruled out? The dogs hit on the engine area, and it may have just been a workers injury. Correct me if Im wrong.
They took her bed out. Lab is running tests maybe they think she passed in her room? Possible of course but then what did they do with her?
The UK is not a third world country, has very tough immigration laws and is surrounded by water, it is almost impossible to smuggle anything in, certainly NOT a child.
I don't know, mytime, but considering the paucity of facts that were communicated in the presser ~ it makes me wonder if the entire presser might have been done to encourage someone to confess to what they know.