NE NE - Corrie Wood, 28, Grant, 20 September 2008 #1

[djkbs0416]

I know this is taking a really long time!! I can't believe that they haven't got it figured out yet!!

 

[NSC]

I am still WONDERING about the mother of the BF"s little boy... everything is so weird in this case. I hope it comes to a quick conclusion!!!

 

[mmleikam]

another defending the girl who drove her home

That was me.

 

[mmleikam]

djkbs0416,

If Scott was the one logging into Corrie's account, why did he delete the information regarding Acousti Construction? Seems to me that since that company is his baby and his life that he would leave that information there.

 

[djkbs0416]

djkbs0416,

If Scott was the one logging into Corrie's account, why did he delete the information regarding Acousti Construction? Seems to me that since that company is his baby and his life that he would leave that information there.[/QUOTE

Well probably because he doesn't want his construction business to be in any way connected to the murder so he got rid of it.

 

[mmleikam]

Well probably because he doesn't want his construction business to be in any way connected to the murder so he got rid of it.

I still find it hard to believe that Scott is the one that did that to Corrie's MySpace. I guess until I see proof that he did it, such as him actually telling me or my husband that he did that, I'll just assume it is someone else playing games.

Maybe I'm naive but I still believe the best in people. Scott loved Corrie. Some people say it's not evident in their pictures together...well, thanks for that info, because apparently my husband doesn't love me either. He never smiles in pictures because he hates to have his picture taken. Some people just aren't smilers. Doesn't mean anything.

Until the case goes to court and a jury finds Scott guilty, I'm going to assume he's still innocent. I don't even care if I'm wrong and he did do it. I'll always know that if he is innocent, I was one of the few that stood behind him.

 

[NSC]

djkbs0416,

If Scott was the one logging into Corrie's account, why did he delete the information regarding Acousti Construction? Seems to me that since that company is his baby and his life that he would leave that information there.[/QUOTE

Well probably because he doesn't want his construction business to be in any way connected to the murder so he got rid of it.

This is what I was thinking. Ditto.

 

[djkbs0416]

I still find it hard to believe that Scott is the one that did that to Corrie's MySpace. I guess until I see proof that he did it, such as him actually telling me or my husband that he did that, I'll just assume it is someone else playing games.

Maybe I'm naive but I still believe the best in people. Scott loved Corrie. Some people say it's not evident in their pictures together...well, thanks for that info, because apparently my husband doesn't love me either. He never smiles in pictures because he hates to have his picture taken. Some people just aren't smilers. Doesn't mean anything.

Until the case goes to court and a jury finds Scott guilty, I'm going to assume he's still innocent. I don't even care if I'm wrong and he did do it. I'll always know that if he is innocent, I was one of the few that stood behind him.

Well that's your opinion. I know that he is the one that did it and he just proved his guilt even more than before. You have stated before that you don't even know Scott, that you have just met him a few times but your husband knows him, how can you stand behind someone so firmly when you don't even "know" him?? Probably because you didn't know Corrie at all so you've just got to stick with the one that you had at least met a few times...right?? And you don't even care if you are wrong and he did do it because you will feel proud that you are one of the few that stood behind him? Why so you can be proud to have stood behind a killer of an innocent woman?? Ok, like I said it's your opinion but it doesn't sound too good...

 

[NSC]

I still find it hard to believe that Scott is the one that did that to Corrie's MySpace. I guess until I see proof that he did it, such as him actually telling me or my husband that he did that, I'll just assume it is someone else playing games.

Maybe I'm naive but I still believe the best in people. Scott loved Corrie. Some people say it's not evident in their pictures together...well, thanks for that info, because apparently my husband doesn't love me either. He never smiles in pictures because he hates to have his picture taken. Some people just aren't smilers. Doesn't mean anything.

Until the case goes to court and a jury finds Scott guilty, I'm going to assume he's still innocent. I don't even care if I'm wrong and he did do it. I'll always know that if he is innocent, I was one of the few that stood behind him.

I too, love to see the best in people. I think because you actually know/knew these people personally you are in an entirely different situation. For instance, I did not know these two personally, I go entirely off what facts and information is presented. Therefore, the emotion is not as strong for me to make an hypothesis. I think there are a lot of grey areas that still have yet to produce any answers. And like wrinkles wrote above, anything could be possible. I am not sure if you have ever heard of the saying "you never know what goes on behind closed doors" -- I have been shocked in the past at things that I have found out about other couples, where I could have swore things were unbelieveable between them. I have a neighbor - they seemed so in love, he was so romantic - etc etc etc.. Anyway, he had a mistress and kicked wife and kids out. Just nuts!!

As far as the myspace thing, DJK, didn't you say you had confirmation on this??? And I wasn't solely looking on Scott not smiling in the pictures. I was looking at the body language as well. I am really sorry if your husband doesn't smile in pictures with you but it isn't related to this case, is it?? I am not trying to be mean but in my opinion body language is an important clue. And just because your husband doesn't smile, doesn't make him a killer, because you are still here. However, the person we are speaking of, is not.


I have yet to hear where the mother of Scott's child is and why she is not with her child. This could open up another scenario to be explored.

 

[NSC]

Well that's your opinion. I know that he is the one that did it and he just proved his guilt even more than before. You have stated before that you don't even know Scott, that you have just met him a few times but your husband knows him, how can you stand behind someone so firmly when you don't even "know" him?? Probably because you didn't know Corrie at all so you've just got to stick with the one that you had at least met a few times...right?? And you don't even care if you are wrong and he did do it because you will feel proud that you are one of the few that stood behind him? Why so you can be proud to have stood behind a killer of an innocent woman?? Ok, like I said it's your opinion but it doesn't sound too good...

Whoah, I didn't catch this earlier -- you didn't even know Corrie and barely knew Scott??? Please explain.

 

[mmleikam]

Well that's your opinion. I know that he is the one that did it and he just proved his guilt even more than before. You have stated before that you don't even know Scott, that you have just met him a few times but your husband knows him, how can you stand behind someone so firmly when you don't even "know" him?? Probably because you didn't know Corrie at all so you've just got to stick with the one that you had at least met a few times...right?? And you don't even care if you are wrong and he did do it because you will feel proud that you are one of the few that stood behind him? Why so you can be proud to have stood behind a killer of an innocent woman?? Ok, like I said it's your opinion but it doesn't sound too good...

I'll be the first to admit I was wrong if Scott is guilty. And you're right, it is my opinion and I follow my gut. If I'm wrong, fine, I'm wrong. I'm not a pussy, I'll admit to being wrong. I don't "know" OJ Simpson, but I feel very strongly that he killed Nicole. I don't "know" Michael Jackson, but I feel very strongly that he didn't do anything disgusting to those kids.

And knowing or not knowing Corrie has nothing to do with it. I certainly don't think she beat the crap out of herself. Someone hurt her, someone KILLED her. The point is, who did it? Fine, you think Scott did it. That's your opinion. My husband, my mother in law and a few of my friends know Scott and they don't think he did it either.

I'd think differently if there was a motive. Say she was cheating on him. Well, I can see that being a motive to kill her. Extreme rage and all. Say she was going to dissolve Acousti Construction. Everyone knows it's her and her parents money that made Acousti Construction what it is. So is she was going to dissolve it, perhaps that'd be motive to kill her. But right now, there hasn't been a motive that could place Scott there, so until there is one, I'm going to assume Scott is innocent.

And you don't even care if you are wrong and he did do it because you will feel proud that you are one of the few that stood behind him?

You took that entirely out of context. I said, word for word:

Until the case goes to court and a jury finds Scott guilty, I'm going to assume he's still innocent. I don't even care if I'm wrong and he did do it. I'll always know that if he is innocent, I was one of the few that stood behind him.

Meaning that if he is innocent, I will be one of the few that stood behind him. I won't be one of the many that strung him up right away.

 

[mmleikam]

I am not sure if you have ever heard of the saying "you never know what goes on behind closed doors" -- I have been shocked in the past at things that I have found out about other couples, where I could have swore things were unbelieveable between them. I have a neighbor - they seemed so in love, he was so romantic - etc etc etc.. Anyway, he had a mistress and kicked wife and kids out. Just nuts!!

Yes, I have heard that expression before. But that isn't really relative to this case, is it. Oh, and not to be mean, of course. Because that always softens the blow.

But I have heard that expression before because I've been in that situation with my own ex. But again, not relative to this case.

And I wasn't solely looking on Scott not smiling in the pictures. I was looking at the body language as well. I am really sorry if your husband doesn't smile in pictures with you but it isn't related to this case, is it?? I am not trying to be mean but in my opinion body language is an important clue. And just because your husband doesn't smile, doesn't make him a killer, because you are still here. However, the person we are speaking of, is not.

I was using the not smiling thing as an example. One example.

Whoah, I didn't catch this earlier -- you didn't even know Corrie and barely knew Scott??? Please explain.

What's there to explain? I stated before that I didn't know Corrie (though my husband has since corrected me...he reminded me that I'd met her at the lake this summer when we were all camping out there). And I've met Scott a handful of times. My husband is pretty good friends with him. My mother in law partied with Scott and Corrie the night she died. A dear family friend is the one that took her home that night.

 

[mmleikam]

I did want to add that if Scott did do it, I feel really sorry for him. Sorry for him that he felt it needed to come to that. That he couldn't control his urge to hurt her or that he couldn't find another release.

To me, it doesn't matter who did it. I just want them found and brought to justice so that the community can relax, mourn the loss of a wonderful woman and mother and move on with life.

 

[djkbs0416]

mmleikam,

You said that there is no motive for Scott; well the motive is right here, not to mention in YOUR writing:

I live in the town Corrie lived in and was killed in. I want to clear some things up.



They didn't live in an apartment. They lived in a house.



A friend of Corrie's took her home that night. Corrie and Scott had an argument and Corrie wanted to go home, so a friend of hers took her home and put her to bed.



I have no idea where Scott stayed that night. But they did live together.


They had an argument. He told the friend that took her home that Corrie needed to get her stuff out of the house before he got home. Later the friend called Scott back and told him that Corrie was home and at that point, Scott told the friend to forget it, he'd get his stuff later and leave.



They fought. A lot. And Scott has a history of being abusive (not necessarily towards Corrie) but he has a temper. It only makes sense that the family wouldn't want him to attend.



I personally didn't know Corrie. I do know Scott though. Well, not "know" him, but I've met him a few times and my husband knows him pretty well. The friend that took Corrie home that night is a good friend of the family and at this point, she has said that the police have been blowing up her phone with questions, trying to piece the whole night together.

The motive is, (that you stated) is that Scott and Corrie and got into an argument that night and Corrie wanted to go home and Scott did not. You also stated that he had even said that he wanted Corrie to get her things out. You also stated that he has a temper and they have fought before. Well, this is quite a motive in my opinion...of course. It is apparent that Scott has had a violent past, they had fought before, they got into an argument (one big enough for him to want Corrie to get her things out of the house), and they were drinking: thats a lot, so I think after all of this he could have went home and they got into a fight and he beat the crap out of her. Maybe he didn't mean for it to end the in death the way it did but it DID so he paniced and left and came back in the morning and called 911.

And another thing, I'm really tired of hearing everyone say, "Scott loved Corrie so much"...How does anyone know this for sure? They could have had a very violent relationship in private and in public they acted like everything was going really good. So saying that he loved her doesn't mean anything!!

 

[mmleikam]

mmleikam,

You said that there is no motive for Scott; well the motive is right here, not to mention in YOUR writing:



The motive is, (that you stated) is that Scott and Corrie and got into an argument that night and Corrie wanted to go home and Scott did not. You also stated that he had even said that he wanted Corrie to get her things out. You also stated that he has a temper and they have fought before. Well, this is quite a motive in my opinion...of course. It is apparent that Scott has had a violent past, they had fought before, they got into an argument (one big enough for him to want Corrie to get her things out of the house), and they were drinking: thats a lot, so I think after all of this he could have went home and they got into a fight and he beat the crap out of her. Maybe he didn't mean for it to end the in death the way it did but it DID so he paniced and left and came back in the morning and called 911.

And another thing, I'm really tired of hearing everyone say, "Scott loved Corrie so much"...How does anyone know this for sure? They could have had a very violent relationship in private and in public they acted like everything was going really good. So saying that he loved her doesn't mean anything!!

Look, I'm tired of feeling like you're attacking me for my opinion. I understand that we disagree. That's not a big deal. Yes, it's possible that they argued and he beat on her and it ended in death. I'm not saying it's impossible or even improbable. It's very obvious that you don't care much for Scott, and that's understandable because you think he did it. I get it. But I'm not Scott, so you can stop getting all pissy about the stuff I say.

Even if they did have a very violent relationship in private, it doesn't mean he didn't love her. I'm not even going to use any examples because I'll be told it's not even relevant to the case.

The way I feel is this: We don't know who did it. Because of his temper and his past, it may possibly have been Scott but until he has been arrested and tried for it, I'm not going to point fingers or throw around accusations. No one knows for sure except the actual killer. From what I know and have heard about Scott and Corrie's relationship, I just can't picture him doing this. But rage tends to get out of hand, so yes, it's possible.

There isn't any evidence pointing towards him. It's a lot of hearsay right now.

 

[djkbs0416]

Look, I'm tired of feeling like you're attacking me for my opinion. I understand that we disagree. That's not a big deal. Yes, it's possible that they argued and he beat on her and it ended in death. I'm not saying it's impossible or even improbable. It's very obvious that you don't care much for Scott, and that's understandable because you think he did it. I get it. But I'm not Scott, so you can stop getting all pissy about the stuff I say.

Even if they did have a very violent relationship in private, it doesn't mean he didn't love her. I'm not even going to use any examples because I'll be told it's not even relevant to the case.

The way I feel is this: We don't know who did it. Because of his temper and his past, it may possibly have been Scott but until he has been arrested and tried for it, I'm not going to point fingers or throw around accusations. No one knows for sure except the actual killer. From what I know and have heard about Scott and Corrie's relationship, I just can't picture him doing this. But rage tends to get out of hand, so yes, it's possible.

There isn't any evidence pointing towards him. It's a lot of hearsay right now.

I'm sorry you felt like I was attacking you for your opinion. That is not what I intended I was just pointing out what you were saying...anyway, that's all I have to say, just I'm sorry I didn't mean to make you feel that way. We all do have our own opinions and yes there is a lot of hearsay right now. I guess we will just have to wait for the truth to come out and I hope and pray that is SOON!!

 

[djkbs0416]

I also wanted to add that I'm very relieved that Corrie's sister has taken over her myspace page so that she is the only one to be able to access it. Friends can feel free to leave their comments for Corrie now and not have to worry about them getting deleted.

 

[NSC]

I also wanted to add that I'm very relieved that Corrie's sister has taken over her myspace page so that she is the only one to be able to access it. Friends can feel free to leave their comments for Corrie now and not have to worry about them getting deleted.

That is good news!!!

 

[mmleikam]

I'm sorry you felt like I was attacking you for your opinion. That is not what I intended I was just pointing out what you were saying...anyway, that's all I have to say, just I'm sorry I didn't mean to make you feel that way. We all do have our own opinions and yes there is a lot of hearsay right now. I guess we will just have to wait for the truth to come out and I hope and pray that is SOON!!

I agree, I hope it's solved soon because it's beginning to drive me crazy. The theories that keep running through my head...I don't even know what to think half the time.

Anyway, I was a little surprised that the paper didn't have any updates on the case. I mean, it's a crappy newspaper, but I still thought there would be a blurb about it...whether the autopsy results were back or not or at least SOMETHING to give us peace.

 

[MCDRAW]

I'm not saying Scott is innocent or guilty. I'm just going to say that alot of people are killed in domestic dispute cases. The only motive...anger.