MeoW333
New Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 4,761
- Reaction score
- 80
With my exercise posted above I don't think Muggy Brown was a victim of the serial killer but rather a local killer. The murder doesn't fit with the pattern mentioned above. I think it is some sort of serial killer ritual, the paired killings, the timing, and possibly a personal work schedule dictating how he does this.
Also if he is not killing somewhere else then he has escalated. 2 killings in 2005, No killings in 2006, 2 killings in 2007, 2-3 killings in 2008, so if his pattern holds true there should be other attempts around March 2009.
BTW, thanks for the compliment. :blowkiss:
You really think Muggy Brown isn't the SK's victim.. that makes me think a lot

The way i thought of it was that for someone to be a serial killer, they need to have at least 3 victims with periods of "cooling off". I thought maybe the serial killer killed Muggy since he got mad he wasn't getting attention after the first four killed. So he killed her and left her at the police's shooting range as a taunt to the police for not recognizing his work.
If she wasn't killed by the killer, and he is strictly sticking to ritual, then i guess we have to wait until he kills again to see if his killings will stay escalated with his pattern.
I hate to say that we have to wait until he kills again, yet if local LE were on the ball for the other killings, maybe the killer would be in custody already..
They seem to be in denial that they have a serial killer, and think it's all drug problem related killings. I wonder if they're trying to somehow lure the killer out by not recognizing him, yet that would be giving Jennings police too much credit. Serial killers are usually egotistical creatures, and the local police aren't reconizing him may be making him mad. We still don't know why he's killing, or why he's killing them in pairs..