New Sketch of Maddie Abductor

[colomom]

The Pig Farmer/Cooperman/Creepyman??

Anybody have Photoshop??? We need his hair and mustache added....

 

[ThoughtFox]

Oooo - he looks foreign - must be creepy or something.

:bang: :crazy:

*trying not to laugh too much about this but laughing anyway*

So, the man Jane Tanner identified as Bundleman, supposedly the abductor, is really a local pig farmer. I wonder if he was carrying a pig, and she confused this with pink pajamas. Does Jane wear glasses?

I keep using this graphic:

Now I'm just waiting for someone to tell us that we shouldn't believe this story because it is printed in the newspaper. Well, sorry, I'm going to read it anyway. And believe it.

 

[ThoughtFox]

Fox news just reported on the sketch. (I haven't heard much on Fox lately about Madeleine). They said the McCanns say the pig farmer is not the same guy as in the drawing. (Wow, didn't see that coming....NOT!)

The McCanns didn't see the guy, how do they know he's not the same person?

Jane told them, I guess.

(Sorry - I have to pull myself together here.)

 

[Trino]

The guy now has "rastas" (braids) so it's difficult to make a comparison, but IMO he had nothing to do with Madeline's abduction. Apparently, he's not keen to talk to the press, wants the press to back off. He threatened them with his dogs and threatened to get a gun. Time to leave the local pig farmer alone, me thinks. He has been cleared.

 

[ThoughtFox]

Indeed - leave the poor guy alone!

I just realized another contradiction by Jane Tanner and I don't know why I didn't see this last night.

She said it worried her that the child she saw being carried (if that's what it was) didn't have on any shoes, and it was a cold night in May.

But she also said it was "strange" that the man was wearing a coat and long pants, since most of the tourists were wearing cut off pants.

So . . . if it seemed cold that night . . . then why was it strange . . . for a man to be wearing a coat? :waitasec:

Hello? Wouldn't the locals be dressed better for the weather than the tourists there for a week?

 

[Pinkhammer]

this photo of the person who might have took madeleine mccann in my opinion doesn't look like robert murat one bit and that jane tanner and co are just spinning this to make the mccanns look innocent no wonder they had a secret meeting in november in leicestershire about this case as it just now a propaganda exercise in making money and spinning lies against others people who are just pawns in a campaign / witch hunted.

Righto, martin. Every time the McCanns and the other Tapas Child Neglectors have a "secret meeting" (lawyers and Clarence included, of course), we are then treated to a "new" kidnapping, suspect, photo, sketch, or some other rot.

What a nasty bunch they are!

 

[ThoughtFox]

I was just thinking - this is really good news for Murat because he can't be called "bundleman" anymore. :clap:

 

[Pinkhammer]

Oh Gord, I don't see her as "hung drawn and quarted", I just think she is either a liar or can't remember what she had for breakfast.

Thanks for your brilliant posts and links on "The Evolution of Bundleman".
You've gathered together all we need to know about these bogus sketches.

Doesn't Britain have any good investigative reporters? There are so many angles to this story that should be explored. For instance, what is the history of drug and alcohol abuse among the Tapas Creeps? Why have a couple of them been fired or suspended from jobs? Why do they travel together, down infinite bottles of wine, leave their children unattended, etc.?

I would be afraid--VERY AFRAID--to use a National Health Service physician in the Brit Isles after reading about the daily habits of this bunch of losers.

 

[Pinkhammer]

I was just thinking - this is really good news for Murat because he can't be called "bundleman" anymore. :clap:

He has been virtually cleared by Jane Tanner.

 

[Pinkhammer]

New Madeleine McCann link 'ruled out'



Last Updated: 6:27pm GMT 24/01/2008








A man with a similar appearance to that of a suspected abductor of Madeleine McCann - whose "scruffy" image appeared in two sketches released by her parents - has been traced and ruled out of the police investigation, it has been claimed.

In full: The Madeleine McCann investigation The man, who apparently has straggly hair, protruding teeth and a thick moustache, was found living in a village just eight miles from where the four-year-old disappeared in Praia da Luz in the Algarve last May.
Watch: The man seen loitering on the beach at Praia da LuzPolice in Portugal have apparently interviewed the man – named locally as pig-farmer Joaquim Jose Marques – on two different occasions but eliminated him from inquiries.
Clarence Mitchell, spokesman for Kate and Gerry McCann, said as far as they were aware the man had not been traced and Metodo 3, the Spanish private detective agency hired by the couple, was still following up "dozens" of leads sparked by the images.
The pictures were circulated around the world after British holiday-maker Gail Cooper gave a detailed description to an FBI-accredited artist of a "strange-looking man" seen loitering near the McCann's holiday apartment on three separate occasions before Madeleine vanished.
The image matched a description given by a friend of the couple Jane Tanner who claimed to have seen a man carrying a child wearing identical pyjamas to Madeleine.

 

[Texana]

I feel sorry for the pig farmer. How humiliating to be labeled as "creepy man."

 

[SleuthMom]

I feel sorry for the pig farmer. How humiliating to be labeled as "creepy man."

Unfortunately, the Mc Canns don't care at all as long as the investigation leads away from them.

 

[Claycat]

He doesn't look like the drawing at all! It is obviously the wrong man!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...tml?in_article_id=510082&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

 

[Texana]

Unfortunately, the Mc Canns don't care at all as long as the investigation leads away from them.

Remember the poor Moroccan farmer and his daughter?

 

[april4sky]

You're right, there is no evidence of an abduction.

In fact no evidence except that Madeleine is missing.

Which brings us back to my point of how dangerous a little knowledge, or even none, as in this case can be.

 

[ThoughtFox]

In fact no evidence except that Madeleine is missing.

Which brings us back to my point of how dangerous a little knowledge, or even none, as in this case can be.

You keep writing that over and over, but I wonder where you think we should get this information, other than the media and official police sources?

I'm sorry but I just don't understand your point. By your accounts there are no true "facts" in this case, but I think there are plenty of them.

There isn't a case on Websleuths that isn't researched and discussed exactly the same way as this one, and the McCanns are treated no differently than any other suspects of a crime.

 

[txsvicki]

The article sure is trying to put down the pig farmer by saying that he was screaming obscenities while surrounded by feral dogs and pigs. I'm not even sure that feral dogs and pigs would stand around together.

 

[april4sky]

You keep writing that over and over, but I wonder where you think we should get this information, other than the media and official police sources?

I'm sorry but I just don't understand your point. By your accounts there are no true "facts" in this case, but I think there are plenty of them.

There isn't a case on Websleuths that isn't researched and discussed exactly the same way as this one, and the McCanns are treated no differently than any other suspects of a crime.

Twice to be exact, and that because it was purposely twisted the first time.

We seem to have a difference of opinion of "research."
Discussion would be good but not when the only purpose seems to be to crucify the McCanns on rumour and malicious leaks.

I'm sorry ThoughtFox, but thats mostly what I see happening.

Sadly Websleuths isn't immune from malicious rumours as they are being picked up and repeated here from other boards. The Mirror board included. It's no surprise that they have decided to close their Madeleine thread as it had moved way beyond "Research"

 

[iNTERESTEDWOMAN]

Twice to be exact, and that because it was purposely twisted the first time.

We seem to have a difference of opinion of "research."
Discussion would be good but not when the only purpose seems to be to crucify the McCanns on rumour and malicious leaks.

This is where I get totally lost with your view of this case. The McCanns (TEAM) Mitchell specifically, has crucified Robert Murat, The Creepy Man, the Moroccans, and MANY other of their suspects, but it appears, that they are entitled to do this. Robert Murat is a house hold name, and will probably never be taken seriously again for the rest of his life because the McCanns have pointed the finger at him so many times.

I'm sorry ThoughtFox, but thats mostly what I see happening.

Sadly Websleuths isn't immune from malicious rumours as they are being picked up and repeated here from other boards. The Mirror board included. It's no surprise that they have decided to close their Madeleine thread as it had moved way beyond "Research"

I am totally confused with your mission. Are you here to research the case, and to read about what other people "think" about new leads? Or just to tell us that we are not allowed to believe anything we read? :waitasec:

 

[april4sky]

This is where I get totally lost with your view of this case. The McCanns (TEAM) Mitchell specifically, has crucified Robert Murat, The Creepy Man, the Moroccans, and MANY other of their suspects, but it appears, that they are entitled to do this. Robert Murat is a house hold name, and will probably never be taken seriously again for the rest of his life because the McCanns have pointed the finger at him so many times.





I am totally confused with your mission. Are you here to research the case, and to read about what other people "think" about new leads? Or just to tell us that we are not allowed to believe anything we read? :waitasec:

iNTERESTEDWOMAN I believe I was clear enough.
I don't think the problem is confusion as much as you not liking my posts.

You could always put me on ignore you know.