New Spokes Person For Anthonys???

  • #181
I'm wondering if this person was also connected to another skunk who claims to have inside "sources" and went on a rampage about certain people and WS. I had no idea this MB was connected in some way to this board. Is this a fact?

I wouldn't be surprised if MB has connections to the 'skunk'.
 
  • #182
I am not sure I am thinking of the same person as MB. Just recall someone who posted here awhile ago who was a great advocate of CA, heard she was banned, and her name began with K ... I might be wrong though.

You're thinking of someone different, had a 526 in name, right?
 
  • #183
  • #184
  • #185
What was she talking about?

I laughed out loud when she suggested in the previous interview that police dust the mall playground equipment for prints.

Given that the photo they released last week of the little girl that isn't Caylee was actually taken in October and dozens if not hundreds of kids have played there since, it made me question her intellectual skills.

Yes, and wouldn't Caylee's finger prints have to actually be on record for this to be effective?
 
  • #186
You know what is weird. CA and GA come out to this PC looking groomed. I am sure even that is a chore to them at this point but they still make themselves do it. I mean yes CA goes into trances now but she is showered. Its the spokesperson who is coming out looking like she's been run over and put away wet. She looks like GA and CA should and they look fresh, once again it's "backwards".

Having once been under contract for a public relations position for a hospital, the running joke in the industry was having a navy blue suit and a light blue blouse as a requitement in front of the camera. We all had the standard outfit.
She makes the Anthony's look bad in the public view. Which isn't fair, cause they are doing a good job of it themselves.
jmo
 
  • #187
  • #188
Tricia, I think I remember her posts here. If it is the one I am thinking of (don't know if I can say her name, it began with a 'K'.) She was very annoying.

I don't think she ever posted here on WS. If she did I did not know about it.

Her blog was what I was referring too. Don't know if it is still up or not nor do I care.

It still is mind boggling to think about someone posting something on their blog so outrages, filled with lies, without a second thought about the consequences. Just wanted attention for herself.

Scary.
 
  • #189
She's laughable. She started posting her nasty allegations as soon as she noticed a wee bit of traffic to her blog. Someone here at WS started a thread about the blog and created just a hint of traffic and WHAM! She did her thing. They've picked her well. They couldn't have done better.

LOL!

MOO
 
  • #190
I am not sure I am thinking of the same person as MB. Just recall someone who posted here awhile ago who was a great advocate of CA, heard she was banned, and her name began with K ... I might be wrong though.

It wouldn't surprise me in the least if that was her. I know I read somewhere that she had a blog or forum, but I've never seen it.
 
  • #191
They can PR all they want, it's not going to change the fact that Caylee's DNA was found in that damn car.
Honestly I don't know what they think they're going to accomplish, because no reasonable person is going to take that woman seriously. It's a joke, and she makes them look worse. These people need a wake up call and that might be the FBI knocking on their door to ask a few questions, they said they want to find Caylee and I think the perfect people to help accomplish that is the cops.
They pi$$ me off. :furious:
 
  • #192
They can PR all they want, it's not going to change the fact that Caylee's DNA was found in that damn car.
Honestly I don't know what they think they're going to accomplish, because no reasonable person is going to take that woman seriously. It's a joke, and she makes them look worse. These people need a wake up call and that might be the FBI knocking on their door to ask a few questions, they said they want to find Caylee and I think the perfect people to help accomplish that is the cops.
They pi$$ me off. :furious:

Let's just hope and pray that ALL 12 of those jurors are reasonable people.
 
  • #193
The fam should be looking around for another defense attorney at this point and forget about the PR person. She won't come in very handy in defending the charges which could come in the future.
 
  • #194
Wow, I guess I missed all this excitement! Must have been BC (before Cocoamom) LOL
 
  • #195
They can PR all they want, it's not going to change the fact that Caylee's DNA was found in that damn car.
Honestly I don't know what they think they're going to accomplish, because no reasonable person is going to take that woman seriously. It's a joke, and she makes them look worse. These people need a wake up call and that might be the FBI knocking on their door to ask a few questions, they said they want to find Caylee and I think the perfect people to help accomplish that is the cops.
They pi$$ me off. :furious:


:clap::clap::clap: Great post fay :blowkiss:

May I also add.......It makes me furious:furious: when Michelle compares Caylee to Elizabeth S. OK, Michelle, lets compare. Do you want to start with her parents doing everything LE asked of them.
 
  • #196
Let's just hope and pray that ALL 12 of those jurors are reasonable people.

Jurors must have a prerequisite: They must all be members of Websleuths! :clap:
 
  • #197
:clap::clap::clap: Great post fay :blowkiss:

May I also add.......It makes me furious:furious: when Michelle compares Caylee to Elizabeth S. OK, Michelle, lets compare. Do you want to start with her parents doing everything LE asked of them.

There is a place on her blog to leave comments. Naturally, she only prints the ones that are complimentary, but she does have to read them in order to screen them. I know of several people who have called her on the comparison of the Smart case, but she continues to dazzle with dumbness. That just shows how uninformed she is.
 
  • #198
They can PR all they want, it's not going to change the fact that Caylee's DNA was found in that damn car.
Honestly I don't know what they think they're going to accomplish, because no reasonable person is going to take that woman seriously. It's a joke, and she makes them look worse. These people need a wake up call and that might be the FBI knocking on their door to ask a few questions, they said they want to find Caylee and I think the perfect people to help accomplish that is the cops.
They pi$$ me off. :furious:

They are trying too hard to entrap the LE into investigating sightings, such as this one at the Mall. They know the sighting is not credible but they are trying to gather public opinion against LE by making a big deal about LE not investigating.

Why? It is vital for KC's Defense for JB to be able to say that Caylee being alive is credible and will be found soon. How? Because LE are currently investigating Caylee sightings and they would not be doing that if there wasn't a chance Caylee is alive = Reasonable Doubt.

'A' Family supporters are leaving in droves because this is stepping over the line and risking obstruction of justice.

The LE Trap -- to bait them into investigating Caylee look-alikes and if not, make them look really bad.
 
  • #199
There is a place on her blog to leave comments. Naturally, she only prints the ones that are complimentary, but she does have to read them in order to screen them. I know of several people who have called her on the comparison of the Smart case, but she continues to dazzle with dumbness. That just shows how uninformed she is.
The Smart case was an anomaly, and she knows it. I wonder what the Smart family would think about the comparison.
I saw Mark Klass on NG and he looked furious at the behavior of the A's, I could sense his frustration and outrage.
This woman is tasteless, she looks angry and defiant, like she dares anyone to disagree. What rock did she crawl out under, and is she getting paid and if so by who. :confused:
This case is the saddest thing in the world.
 
  • #200
There is a place on her blog to leave comments. Naturally, she only prints the ones that are complimentary, but she does have to read them in order to screen them. I know of several people who have called her on the comparison of the Smart case, but she continues to dazzle with dumbness. That just shows how uninformed she is.

PR, just like politics, does not require the 'propaganda' to be the truth or the spokesperson to believe it -- or even know better. You are seeding the masses with a 'story'.

It is not about whether MB buys into the Smart comparison -- but more whether the general public does -- or it softens their opinion. You plant seeds of doubt and nurture them -- that's what MB is all about.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
98
Guests online
2,639
Total visitors
2,737

Forum statistics

Threads
632,864
Messages
18,632,777
Members
243,317
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top