New Update from the Mitchell Owens Case.... Feb 3, 2026 43 years later....

Joined
Aug 3, 2022
Messages
77
Reaction score
83
  • #1
New Update on 4 yr old Mitchell Owens, Feb 3, 1983
43 years later....

Mom believes she knows who and where her son is!!!

THINK THINK THINK!!!!!
You guys CAN FIGURE THIS OUT!!!! It is easy....

THINK
THINK THINK...
Added the picture with details in hope you will remember.... Not just Mitchell........... REMEMBER!

 

Attachments

  • Opera Snapshot_2026-02-05_080923_www.facebook.com.webp
    Opera Snapshot_2026-02-05_080923_www.facebook.com.webp
    36.4 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
  • #2
no one cares right?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Why is no one seeing this?
 
  • #4
no one cares right?
We do care, but it's the work day for many of us, so we are not looking at the threads immediately. (I'm retired so I checked on after my morning house chores). Depending on the time of day an hour or two may pass before someone sees a new thread. Also, an update to a decades old case may not catch the attention of a new thread for a child or other vulnerable individual missing just now.

I'm not sure what it is you believe we can "figure out", but thank you for trusting us to try. You stated "the man declined DNA" in an earlier post (which is now deleted, so that may have been posted in error) . I didn't see anything in the linked info about any refusal to give DNA just LE stating they have procedures to follow to do so.. If the refusal is from the man in the hospital, a lot depends on if legally he is considered mentally competent to make a decision of that nature. If there is no voluntarily request agreed upon for the DNA sample the police would have to have a obtain a warrant or judicial order, which requires demonstrating that the sample is necessary to identify or exclude him as a contributor to evidence. If the court order request is refused (assuming he is of a mind where he is competent to make decisions of that nature) refusal could result in contempt of court.
'
One missing report stated the child had a "lazy" eye and a surgical scar on his ribcage. The lazy eye might have had some degree of correction over the years, but a scar is there to stay. That would be pretty easy to check, but again, the person's 4th Amendment rights don't allow for police to just come in and say "let us examine your body for a scar" without your permission. https://www.doenetwork.org/cases/software/mp-main.html?id=173dmca

LE are very familiar with the procedures to obtain DNA, it just doesn't happen quickly. For the mother's sake, I hope the person in Chicago in the hospital will agree, and can legally agree, to assist.

The only other question that came to mind for me was where did this lead come from. Unfortunately, from personal experience I've seen "cold cases" where someone calls in a tip or a lead just for personal attention. NOT saying this is the case, police and private investigators learn quickly how to spot he "crank" calls, but it does happen once in a great while.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
373
Guests online
3,341
Total visitors
3,714

Forum statistics

Threads
639,840
Messages
18,748,473
Members
244,540
Latest member
Jiller2013
Back
Top