New website for Lisa

[iamnotagolem]

I would not call that a beauty mark and if I saw a baby that looked like Lisa and had that on her leg I would assume it wasn't Lisa. Why not just say she has a mole on her leg? I was assuming something large and very light colored, not a small dark mole. I certainly hope they gave police a better description Since they are the ones ruling out alleged citings. How easy is it to get a mole removed? 20 minutes as an outpatient?

 

[Dewey2Me1MoThyme]

I would not call that a beauty mark and if I saw a baby that looked like Lisa and had that on her leg I would assume it wasn't Lisa. Why not just say she has a mole on her leg? I was assuming something large and very light colored, not a small dark mole. I certainly hope they gave police a better description Since they are the ones ruling out alleged citings. How easy is it to get a mole removed? 20 minutes as an outpatient?

I was thinking the same thing only freckle, I would have thought something more noticeable.

 

[iamnotagolem]

It really concerns me. Remember the news article about the family there locally that have had police check for the beauty mark several times and check the birth cert? What if they have a birth cert and the baby died and they kidnapped Lisa b/c they noticed her and how similar she looked to their baby? I try not to get overly worried about these technicalities but beauty mark vs freckle or mole seem like it could change everything, especially if people are looking for the wrong thing.

I really thought that a large beauty mark on her thigh would set her apart from other blonde haired blue eyed babies but now I'm thinking of just how easily she would blend in.

 

[redheadedgal]

but beauty mark vs freckle or mole seem like it could change everything, especially if people are looking for the wrong thing.

a freckle or mole is a beauty mark

if this mark was the only one on lisa, it makes sense that it was mentioned... even a small mark on her outer thigh would be a distinguishing feature imo.


http://www.dailyglow.com/blogs/skin...ences-in-beauty-mark-types-moles-and-freckles

 

[iamnotagolem]

This is what I pictured. Several of the missing posters say birth mark not beauty mark. While I now understand that "beauty mark" is used for both birth marks and freckles and moles I would think a more accurate description would be important.

http://withfriendship.com/images/g/34024/Birthmark-image.jpg

 

[redheadedgal]

golem-- i never realized missing posters mentioned both a birth mark and a beauty mark. i have a very faint birth mark on the back of my neck which resembles the pic you linked above. i also have freckles being a redhead. these two types of marks are very different imo...

it's possible whoever designed the posters made (consistency) errors or maybe the parents weren't consistent with their descriptions... IDK.

thanks for illuminating this

 

[Donjeta]

So there is no actual photo of the birthmark on Lisa?
I don't think it will prove very useful in identifying her in that case. How many toddlers have a small mole somewhere on their thigh?

That sort of tiny spot will mostly go unnoticed in any case.

 

[Whisperer]

Has Deb been charged with anything? Named a POI ~ I'm just wondering if I missed it or if she is still considered a VICTIM with a missing, presumed kidnapped baby?? I haven't been around much lately except to glance if there is good news, but all I see is a whole pile of Deb bashing...

She's the gift that keeps on giving....

 

[Whisperer]

Uhhhh...nice. So on an unseasonably warm day, she is in pants? What in the world is going on with changing things like this? What would be the point?

Sounds more like P.J's to people who don't know better..

 

[Whisperer]

The site is there for PR for Deb. It's not about finding Lisa because she already knows where Lisa is. But, she has nothing to lose by making it look like she is doing something. She knows that where Lisa is, no one knows but her and JI and she also knows that there were no witnesses. I'm sure that her lawyers told her to do it.

She needs to have the website to draw attention to herself. She is nosy and curious as to what we think about her. I may have to leave her a tip...

 

[4Jacy]

QUOTE=Whisperer;7769416][/B]

She's the gift that keeps on giving....[/QUOTE]

:floorlaugh:

 

[highflyer]

Has Deb been charged with anything? Named a POI ~ I'm just wondering if I missed it or if she is still considered a VICTIM with a missing, presumed kidnapped baby?? I haven't been around much lately except to glance if there is good news, but all I see is a whole pile of Deb bashing...

No, she is still considered a victim and has not been named as a person on interest. Why Deb is allowed to be savaged here is beyond me as it seems to go against the sites TOS.

 

[vlpate]

No, she is still considered a victim and has not been named as a person on interest. Why Deb is allowed to be savaged here is beyond me as it seems to go against the sites TOS.

She should not be savaged, but she is open to discussion as long as inferences are made based on facts and MSM. She has stated she failed a lie detector test. LE told her they felt she knew what happened to her baby. They want to interview both separately about the disappearance of their child. I would say this makes her a POI - they haven't been eliminated as suspects.

They certainly, IMO, do not act like victims whose child was kidnapped from her crib in the middle of the night and are trying desperately to find her. October 4, 2011 - Lisa vanishes - October 8, 2011, Parents stop talking to LE.

JMO

 

[Cappuccino]

She is open to discussion but some of it goes beyond the beyonds. There are other cases discussed on here where people have strong suspicions of someone not charged or named as a POI, (see the WM3 forum, for example), but I haven't seen any of them get ripped on like Deborah Bradley.

 

[norest4thewicked]

She needs to have the website to draw attention to herself. She is nosy and curious as to what we think about her. I may have to leave her a tip...

I left her a tip, but she chose not to post it...can't figure out WHY NOT! :floorlaugh:

 

[norest4thewicked]

She should not be savaged, but she is open to discussion as long as inferences are made based on facts and MSM. She has stated she failed a lie detector test. LE told her they felt she knew what happened to her baby. They want to interview both separately about the disappearance of their child. I would say this makes her a POI - they haven't been eliminated as suspects.

They certainly, IMO, do not act like victims whose child was kidnapped from her crib in the middle of the night and are trying desperately to find her. October 4, 2011 - Lisa vanishes - October 8, 2011, Parents stop talking to LE.

JMO

No one has "savaged" her on here. She has admitted to failing a LDT, has stopped talking to LE and will not look for her child. She doesn't sound like a victim at all to me.

 

[vlpate]

She is open to discussion but some of it goes beyond the beyonds. There are other cases discussed on here where people have strong suspicions of someone not charged or named as a POI, (see the WM3 forum, for example), but I haven't seen any of them get ripped on like Deborah Bradley.

It's the same on the TM thread - GZ has not be charged nor is he named as a suspect. In fact, he has not been arrested for anything. I understand how people feel the way they do about GZ - he was the only one there, he admitted to shooting Trayvon. I see this case a lot the same way. DB was there, she was the last to see her baby, she was negligent as a mother by being so drunk she has no idea whether or not she even checked on her sick baby before passing out - and has done nothing to help find her child. To say she's called police to give them bogus tips that have never led to anything is clearly naive or .... well, clearly naive.

She hasn't been savaged - the truth is worse than anything we could come up with.

All JMO

 

[eileenhawkeye]

She is open to discussion but some of it goes beyond the beyonds. There are other cases discussed on here where people have strong suspicions of someone not charged or named as a POI, (see the WM3 forum, for example), but I haven't seen any of them get ripped on like Deborah Bradley.

Patsy Ramsey....

 

[highflyer]

It's the same on the TM thread - GZ has not be charged nor is he named as a suspect. In fact, he has not been arrested for anything. I understand how people feel the way they do about GZ - he was the only one there, he admitted to shooting Trayvon. I see this case a lot the same way. DB was there, she was the last to see her baby, she was negligent as a mother by being so drunk she has no idea whether or not she even checked on her sick baby before passing out - and has done nothing to help find her child. To say she's called police to give them bogus tips that have never led to anything is clearly naive or .... well, clearly naive.

She hasn't been savaged - the truth is worse than anything we could come up with.

All JMO

One has nothing to do with the other. A child is missing in this case. In the other case a man shot a kid and killed him and that is a known fact.

 

[redheadedgal]

Patsy Ramsey....

misty and ron; jvds (before peru); cindy anthony...

One has nothing to do with the other. A child is missing in this case. In the other case a man shot a kid and killed him and that is a known fact.

neither GZ nor DB have been charged nor named as a POI, but there is huge suspicion with both (the criteria given by capp) depending on which side of the fence one is on... therefore, her point is absolutely valid.