legal.beagle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 509
"Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield questions the witness about a previous time she met the accused to have sex.
She said that encounter was normal compared to the second one, where she claims she feared for her life.
"You don't say in your messages [the next day] that you couldn't breathe and you were concerned that you might die, that you were panicked and scared," he said to her.
"Yes, I didn't say that," the woman replied.
"So why not say: 'You nearly killed me last night?'" Mansfield asked.
"I'd already said that to him in person, and I was scared of him ... I didn't want to make him angry," she said.
Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield continues his cross-examination.
He questioned why the witness engaged the accused in conversation after the date where she claims she feared for her life, asking him what he was doing and whether he wanted to see her.
"If you really were horrified and fearful, why would you ask that: 'Do you want to see me?' Why not just say 'I'm angry and I don't want to see you again'."
The woman said she wanted to keep the messages friendly because she was fearful.
"I know it doesn't sound like it, but I had no intention of meeting up with him. I was scared of him, I didn't want him showing up in my life. I didn't believe he would just disappear," she told the jury.
"Why did you not just say that thing that you did to me - '[you] really scared me' - if that is in fact what happened?" Mansfield asked her.
"I didn't want to bring it up again. It's the feeling I got when he said: 'You don't think I did that on purpose do you?'. It was like nothing had even happened," she said."
She said that encounter was normal compared to the second one, where she claims she feared for her life.
"You don't say in your messages [the next day] that you couldn't breathe and you were concerned that you might die, that you were panicked and scared," he said to her.
"Yes, I didn't say that," the woman replied.
"So why not say: 'You nearly killed me last night?'" Mansfield asked.
"I'd already said that to him in person, and I was scared of him ... I didn't want to make him angry," she said.
Defence lawyer Ron Mansfield continues his cross-examination.
He questioned why the witness engaged the accused in conversation after the date where she claims she feared for her life, asking him what he was doing and whether he wanted to see her.
"If you really were horrified and fearful, why would you ask that: 'Do you want to see me?' Why not just say 'I'm angry and I don't want to see you again'."
The woman said she wanted to keep the messages friendly because she was fearful.
"I know it doesn't sound like it, but I had no intention of meeting up with him. I was scared of him, I didn't want him showing up in my life. I didn't believe he would just disappear," she told the jury.
"Why did you not just say that thing that you did to me - '[you] really scared me' - if that is in fact what happened?" Mansfield asked her.
"I didn't want to bring it up again. It's the feeling I got when he said: 'You don't think I did that on purpose do you?'. It was like nothing had even happened," she said."