I had this post almost complete and ready to submit when my tablet/the forum completely lost/ deleted it. So this post is coming a few hours after it was intended to be posted. It may contain old, irrelevant info that's already been covered. It may be an abbreviated version because I don't remember everything because it was typed on the fly w/ a lot of stuff on my mind. I apologize for that in advance.
I've been away for a few days, and damn, I had a lot of catching up to do. To the tune of 40 some pages. I apologize if this is convoluted and all over the place. Several pages back, someone asked if anyone was skilled in reading body language. I watched the PC w/out looking too deeply into any one thing, but just a broad observation taking everything in. IMO, ZH was obviously exhausted. TO ME, she appears to not really have changed in emotion since the announcement of the contact being made. IMO, at this time, I don't think ZH has reason to believe AH is remotely close to being safe, or possibly even alive. IMO, she reasonably believed there was a possibility she was alive on or about 22 Oct. 2013. This is dependent upon the letter, which I'll get into later. I did observe what I believe were a few "tells" coming from ZH. When a person is asked a question that elicits a "yes or no" response, they often show a physical sign prior to that question even being completed. To explain: Out of respect, and not to be rude, while the question is being asked, and you already know the answer before its finished being asked, you'll subtly start to move your head in the direction of "yes or no" before you even verbally address it. I know the questions were not being directed towards ZH, but considering the personal and extraordinary nature of this situation, its human nature to subconsciously behave in this manner. Also, towards the end there was a question being asked where ZH looks to her left with what appears to be the look of "seeking approval" or "opinion seeking." I don't remember what the specific questions were. Like I said, I ran through all of this very quickly. I will go back and watch it all again. This is all MO from my experience conducting 100's of interviews and interrogations.
A few other things from the PC. Correct me if I'm wrong please, but wasn't KR the one, with it being unsolicited, broach the topic of sex trafficking (meaning that specific PC that day) ? If so, what was the motive for this ? If this is the case, IMO, I don't think its "sex trafficking". I would lean more towards a single (or possibly a pair) of predators. Don't look to far into this - I think more like a David Parker Ray. Not the torture/slave aspect, but a similar "holding". Several of Ray's victims voluntarily got into vehicles of his daughter (they were acquaintances). One was the GF or ex GF of one of his cohorts. I'm just strictly throwing a HYPOTHETICAL situation hat into the ring.
Looking at the letter is what really holds the info. Why was it "written"? What were it's contents? Was it "written " under AH's own volition? A possibility I look at is if there is a pair harboring/holding AH, I believe there's a good possibility one is a female. All MO, and a little brainstorming w/ out knowing any of the contents of the letter. One really could take and interpret, or spin this into anything. Both by attempting to interpret the PC and theorize about the letter. That's evident by reading all the posts on these threads. I'll digress before this derails from my original intentions. Back to the letter. If I recall, LE and ZH say they believe it was "written" by AH because of it's TONE. I keep putting "written" in quotations because they are saying it was the tone that makes them believe it came from AH. IMO, this sounds more like it was typed, or possibly not written by AH, but transcribed by someone else. Handwriting analysis would be able to determine w/ extremely high certainty whether it was or wasn't written by AH. I know someone mentioned it may not be recognized because it may not have been cursive, but written in "block" style print. A handwriting expert could determine even if it was written in hieroglyphics.
I know there are people who believe the PC was precipitated by a possible leak of info. IMO, I'm leaning towards that being a strong possibility. Reasoning - If you have thoroughly prepared for a PC, you've gone over EVERY possible question you'll be fielding from basic to any "off-the-wall" angle. IMO, JY sounded like she was "thinking on the fly" when answering a few questions. Now, I know the point was to be vague and not slip or provide anything other than what you were prepared to release. If you're prepared properly, there's no thinking. You're well rehearsed and ready to answer any question. When you watch other PCs that were prepared in advanced, you can see how they were done in an almost "robotic" fashion.
Sorry for any lack of knowledge on the details. I just wanted to put something out there while things were fresh in my head.
I've been away for a few days, and damn, I had a lot of catching up to do. To the tune of 40 some pages. I apologize if this is convoluted and all over the place. Several pages back, someone asked if anyone was skilled in reading body language. I watched the PC w/out looking too deeply into any one thing, but just a broad observation taking everything in. IMO, ZH was obviously exhausted. TO ME, she appears to not really have changed in emotion since the announcement of the contact being made. IMO, at this time, I don't think ZH has reason to believe AH is remotely close to being safe, or possibly even alive. IMO, she reasonably believed there was a possibility she was alive on or about 22 Oct. 2013. This is dependent upon the letter, which I'll get into later. I did observe what I believe were a few "tells" coming from ZH. When a person is asked a question that elicits a "yes or no" response, they often show a physical sign prior to that question even being completed. To explain: Out of respect, and not to be rude, while the question is being asked, and you already know the answer before its finished being asked, you'll subtly start to move your head in the direction of "yes or no" before you even verbally address it. I know the questions were not being directed towards ZH, but considering the personal and extraordinary nature of this situation, its human nature to subconsciously behave in this manner. Also, towards the end there was a question being asked where ZH looks to her left with what appears to be the look of "seeking approval" or "opinion seeking." I don't remember what the specific questions were. Like I said, I ran through all of this very quickly. I will go back and watch it all again. This is all MO from my experience conducting 100's of interviews and interrogations.
A few other things from the PC. Correct me if I'm wrong please, but wasn't KR the one, with it being unsolicited, broach the topic of sex trafficking (meaning that specific PC that day) ? If so, what was the motive for this ? If this is the case, IMO, I don't think its "sex trafficking". I would lean more towards a single (or possibly a pair) of predators. Don't look to far into this - I think more like a David Parker Ray. Not the torture/slave aspect, but a similar "holding". Several of Ray's victims voluntarily got into vehicles of his daughter (they were acquaintances). One was the GF or ex GF of one of his cohorts. I'm just strictly throwing a HYPOTHETICAL situation hat into the ring.
Looking at the letter is what really holds the info. Why was it "written"? What were it's contents? Was it "written " under AH's own volition? A possibility I look at is if there is a pair harboring/holding AH, I believe there's a good possibility one is a female. All MO, and a little brainstorming w/ out knowing any of the contents of the letter. One really could take and interpret, or spin this into anything. Both by attempting to interpret the PC and theorize about the letter. That's evident by reading all the posts on these threads. I'll digress before this derails from my original intentions. Back to the letter. If I recall, LE and ZH say they believe it was "written" by AH because of it's TONE. I keep putting "written" in quotations because they are saying it was the tone that makes them believe it came from AH. IMO, this sounds more like it was typed, or possibly not written by AH, but transcribed by someone else. Handwriting analysis would be able to determine w/ extremely high certainty whether it was or wasn't written by AH. I know someone mentioned it may not be recognized because it may not have been cursive, but written in "block" style print. A handwriting expert could determine even if it was written in hieroglyphics.
I know there are people who believe the PC was precipitated by a possible leak of info. IMO, I'm leaning towards that being a strong possibility. Reasoning - If you have thoroughly prepared for a PC, you've gone over EVERY possible question you'll be fielding from basic to any "off-the-wall" angle. IMO, JY sounded like she was "thinking on the fly" when answering a few questions. Now, I know the point was to be vague and not slip or provide anything other than what you were prepared to release. If you're prepared properly, there's no thinking. You're well rehearsed and ready to answer any question. When you watch other PCs that were prepared in advanced, you can see how they were done in an almost "robotic" fashion.
Sorry for any lack of knowledge on the details. I just wanted to put something out there while things were fresh in my head.
