Though I do not understand the "sarcasm" stuff in all your posts - after all this should be a safe place to explore all theories and ideas - I certainly agree that many of Maura's actions speak to a suicidal mind. I have always thought that Maura's actions were that of a very distraught person. What I am having trouble with, is how she would have committed suicide, logistically speaking. Perhaps she did have some pills on her. It is just that in all the years I have been following this case, people use the phrase "went off into the woods to commit suicide," as if that is all it takes. Just walking off into the woods wanting to die does not mean that you will.
Additionally, I am always a little cautious with the concept that a person would take a lot with them to start a new life. Look at the missing person's cases where that did happen - none of those people planned it out very well, and many of them took almost nothing with them when they left. Yet those people still managed to stay missing for many years. One other thing about those missing people is that most them made their decision to bolt rather suddenly. For all we know, Maura left Amherst with the intention of suicide, or with the intention of a one night getaway and then decided to disappear on the drive up there. Since this has been a cold case for 10 years, I think it is totally fair and reasonable to explore all angles of this case. I cannot dismiss offhand that Maura did not just go start a new life somewhere.
I understand what you are saying and that a split second decision could be made to run away and start a new life, but why pack up your dorm room (for what purpose does that serve?) why not just get in your car and leave?
And you are going to leave behind clues such as map directions to the very area you went missing from?
you really think some young woman is going to have some sort of bait and switch runaway plan in the works where she leads people to go to one area to look for her and yet, she orchestrates a car ride away from the one area to a completely new area, all in the midst of several houses and people looking out their windows etc..
I would at least think that if she was that clever and had planned it out that thoroughly, she would at least have staged her accident where no other variables could've entered the picture and at any second ruined her plans.
Like staging a car accident right across the street from a house at a few minutes after 7pm that is a very daring and reckless runaway plan for anyone.
The main gripe I have (not with you by the way) is that people keep saying you need to look at everything and not just one thing to determine what happened with such little actual evidence out there.
Yet I provide about seven things, (and I could go on, probably get to about 15 things) that at least in some way support a suicide theory,
but when it comes to some of these other theories (running away, being kidnapped) no one can come up with anything that supports that other than trying to reference other cases which have nothing to do with Maura and her mental state. For instance Maura is no molly bish. Maura had some sort of issues going on right before she went missing, you can't just dismiss that outright.
If Maura would've been a truly happy go lucky person with everything going for her and she just happened to be out shopping one day to buy presents for everyone in her life because she was so grateful to know them --- and then she went missing and all that was left was her car in the mall parking lot --- under that circumstance, I guarantee suicide would never cross my mind.
But in Maura's situation, she fled to the mountains people. Who does that? With little cash and little clothes and Alone and in a broken down car in the evening hours in February.