crypto6 said:
It helps us by focusing on immediate peri-accident period free of the prior encumbrances. The departure from usual procedure of immediate search and rescue if LE thought she was on foot is too great to accommodate any answer except they had reason to believe she had been picked up and was safe at the time. Why would they think that, and why would they still be unwilling to reveal it??
My rank order of possibilities would be:
1. She was picked up by someone she knew who was following her per plan, as you posit. This is far more likely than predator abduction, unless that area is a predator nexus so every third car has one or two. Since we don't know how events unfolded after the posited pickup, more likely than not her judgment in cohorts was good, and she made safely away.
2. She was picked up by someone she did not know who was following her or happened upon her and this person assisted her in getting safely away.
3. She was picked up by someone she knew who was following her per plan, as you posit. This turned unfortunate, and she was harmed.
4 She was picked up by someone she did not know who was following her or happened upon her and this person led to her harm. This could be LE, any of the persons claiming to have seen her, or others.
5. She walked out and perished due to the elements.
6. She walked out to safety.
Favoring scenarios 3 and 4:
A Superior Court judge saying this in ruling against Fred Murray's application to examine records: Considering that it sometimes takes several years even decades for the state to prosecute major crimes, a lapse of two years is not a long period of time, Vaughn wrote. Release of the records could jeopardize the investigation and lead to, among other things, destruction of evidence, intimidation of witnesses and loss of communications with entities providing confidential information. .
If my analysis is correct, the reason the judge is allowing this large amount of time without releasing the records is that a major crime investigation is underway.
Whether this is a criminal investigation of LE or of others is unclear.