JT, I think I should stop commenting. The last thing I want to do is discourage anything POSITIVE that might be done in this case. I get very frustrated looking at it and thinking about it.
Perhaps sometimes that frustration shows in my posts.
As an ex-LEO and life long student of crime and how the system works to prevent and punish it, perhaps I see things differently than many members. This is probably another reason I should just shut up and go away.
It just seems that many here don't understand how "the chain" of evidence really works. And it would take a very lengthy post to explain it all. (Not that I hold myself up as an expert on the subject!!!) Most is just common sense if you think about it.
Whatever we find, we will have to ultimately connect all the dots to a person and place him AT the crime scene the night of the murders.
I asked a friend who IS a real live detective to review this case. His conclusion: Without some DNA evidence........... You fill in the blanks.
I asked a chemical engineer friend of mine to research for some DNA angle that might give us a hope. So far I haven't heard anything.
Complicating this whole case is the investigating arm at the time, ECSO, didn't know enough about DNA in 1961 to spell the word correctly. If there was any such evidence, they blew it.
The only hope I see of recovering this fumble would be to exhume Patty, since maybe she was raped, and TRY to find some DNA evidence.
All the TV shows we watch about the wonderful crime solving abilities of DNA evidence hinge on having some DNA...which we don't. And 49 years after this terrible crime, most of the characters in this drama are either dead or dying like flies.
Anyway, I'll shut-up. I'd love to see this case resolved whether the killer is alive or not. I don't want to contaminate anyone with my own despair and frustrations. If I have made ANY comment on any subject that is factually incorrect, I hope someone will step forward and correct it. My feelings will not be hurt.
Now, I want to leave the group with something that has been troubling me for several weeks.
We are led to believe from the autopsy report that Patty and Mattie were shot with a 38. (Most of which are actually .35 caliber) But this judgment as to the caliber of murder weapon is what bothers me. A few months ago I was watching some TV show...some actual FBI case as I recall. During the autopsy of a murder victim, who was shot in the head, the pathologist stated: "It's difficult to judge the caliber of a weapon just from the bullet wound."
Were Patty and Mattie REALLY shot by a 38 (or 35 caliber weapon)? Just because the entrance wound was about this caliber, does that guarantee us this was the caliber of weapon?
I don't know the answer to these questions. But I do know that bullets are funny creatures and depending on size, shape, velocity, angle, construction and the resistance of what they strike...bullets do some funny things.
I wish we had someone with the medical knowledge here to answer this question. Until that time, I would view any caliber bullet near the crime scene as suspect.
Anyway......good luck.