NV NV - Las Vegas, WhtFem #UP83790, Adult, in underground tunnels, decomposing, tattoos, Aug ‘21

  • #41
I guess it's just really unhealthy conditions to live in. She could have easily got an infection/sickness living down there and passed away from that. Yeah, this case really sticks with me.
Yeah, there’s just something about this case that just hits me. It just really makes you wonder. I’m not her, so I will never know what she really went through, but the closest we can get is family or friends of this UID or the people working on her telling us something. Yeah, living in an underground tunnel doesn’t sound terribly healthy. I really hope that she didn’t live there, but I also hope someone didn’t dump her body. Both are awful. It looks like she’s been there for a good while, couple weeks or months, maybe more, crazy how long she’s just been chillin’ there unnoticed. Found in an underground tunnel, basically mummified, unnoticed for at least a few weeks, what a lonely way to die. I really do feel for this woman.
 
  • #42
If she happens to be local it could be worth it to show pictures of the tattoos to tattoo artists in the area. Not sure if death can cause tattoo ink to change but a professional might be able to estimate how old the tattoos are too.
 
  • #43
Idk if this has been bought up already but
Woman still searching for partner lost in Las Vegas flooding
In March 2020, there was a flash flood that drowned a bunch of people living in tunnels in Las Vegas. It says Denise Jackson, 24, was missing after the flood. Denise isn't listed in any missing person databases, so maybe this is her?
 
  • #44
Idk if this has been bought up already but
Woman still searching for partner lost in Las Vegas flooding
In March 2020, there was a flash flood that drowned a bunch of people living in tunnels in Las Vegas. It says Denise Jackson, 24, was missing after the flood. Denise isn't listed in any missing person databases, so maybe this is her?
I can see that being her. I would submit the lead. There’s just so little to go on.
 
  • #45
I can see that being her. I would submit the lead. There’s just so little to go on.
The article says Denise Jackson is about 5 ft 8 inches so IMO it isnt the UID who was about 4 ft. 11 inches. Plus Denise is Black not Caucasian which the UID is.
 
  • #46
The article says Denise Jackson is about 5 ft 8 inches so IMO it isnt the UID who was about 4 ft. 11 inches. Plus Denise is Black not Caucasian which the UID is.
Oh, that I didn’t see. Thanks for the info. Guess it isn’t her.
 
  • #47
Oh, that I didn’t see. Thanks for the info. Guess it isn’t her.
I dont like to discouage though so please if you think it is possible please send it in!
 
  • #48
The article says Denise Jackson is about 5 ft 8 inches so IMO it isnt the UID who was about 4 ft. 11 inches. Plus Denise is Black not Caucasian which the UID is.
I mean we can see how shrivelled the Jane Doe's body was, her skin colour was totally unrecognisable and she could well have been black and maybe a little taller.
 
  • #49
I mean we can see how shrivelled the Jane Doe's body was, her skin colour was totally unrecognisable and she could well have been black and maybe a little taller.
And it is possible she was probably closer to about 5’1”-5’3”-ish but since she was mummified she shrunk. I definitely think she was petite so I don’t think it’s Denise. But she looks very racially ambiguous to me, and some black people do have medium skin tone and not dark so she *might* be?
 
  • #50
I mean we can see how shrivelled the Jane Doe's body was, her skin colour was totally unrecognisable and she could well have been black and maybe a little taller.
The official write up says she was Black and about 5 ft 8 inches. I do not think the UID is similar in description enough to Denise to be a possible. But like I said, she can still be submitted if anyone wants to.
 
  • #51
His NamUs page has been removed.
 
  • #52
  • #53
Whose namus page removed? U said his as in ?
My bad, in my mind this UID has always been a male. :rolleyes: It was the UID lady's profile that was removed.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
127
Guests online
1,665
Total visitors
1,792

Forum statistics

Threads
632,451
Messages
18,626,940
Members
243,159
Latest member
Tank0228
Back
Top