RubyRed
"Keep on Truckin"
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 14,984
- Reaction score
- 148
I saw in a recent post that Steven's utilties were scheduled to be turned off. Where did this info come from? Very confusing to me. Utilities were in landlord's name, impact would be on landlord's credit reports (even though it isn't credit), would it not? Landlord would allow utilities to be turned off?
And this really changes things as far as my uderstanding goes. While actually being angry at parents for knowing about the situation and wanting to help, taking $100 to drive hundreds of miles to see a former gf family (and he thought she would be there?) instead of say keeping the lights on, it doesn't seem like he was planning on staying there.
Being religious and heavily involved in those activities makes it even more complicated. Given those constraints, I can't think of too many options he had. A job with room and board maybe.
rd
I thought the landlord was responsible for utilities? IIRC SK Mom said that. Or was it clarified by landlord that SK was responsible for that.( half of them)
All of the above. I'm serious.
The landlady claimed that the tenants were responsible to split the utilities, and give that amount to the them.
But since Steven hadn't been paying his rent or utilities, and Z had skipped out, the landlords weren't paying the utility bills.
That's why the utilities were due to be shut off.
But legally, Steven's mother is correct. The utilities were all in the landlord's name; it was up to them to make those payments. There's probably some detail in Utah's rental laws that state you can't turn off your renters' utilities if the utilities are in your name.
The set-up at that house was doomed to failure, IMO. You can't get a decent amount of rent out of a home, if you're keeping the master bedroom and bath for yourself. You're not going to attract the type of renters you need (a solid family), who can pay the bills. You're going to attract exactly what they got: a couple of single, down-on-their luck guys looking for a crash pad.
IMO, it would have been better for them to rent it as a family home at market rate, with the renting family responsible for the utilities. That would have given them enough extra to pay for a motel when they were in St George. They were already having to eat out, since they'd turned the kitchen over to the renters.
My post above asked about utilities. It seems Steven and the other guy stiffed the landlord on everything. So I guess instead of paying them landlords were going to shut them off? Have no idea what they would do since they sometimes stayed at that house as well.