NY – Ex POTUS Donald Trump, sued by E. Jean Carroll, DT found liable re sexual assault, $5M award, countersuit dismissed, appeal rejected, 2023


Judge Lewis Kaplan issued an order on Monday directing parties in the case to notify him by April 20 whether they would be present throughout the trial, scheduled to start April 25 in Manhattan federal court.

The judge was likely interested in learning exactly when Mr Trump might be in court because of the special security arrangements that would be required for a Secret Service-protected former president, who is campaigning for a second term in office.

In his deposition, Mr Trump was dismissive of Carroll’s claims, saying: “Physically she’s not my type.”

Even if Mr Trump decides not to attend the trial, it is likely that significant portions of his deposition will be watched by the jury.

In recent weeks, the judge has denied requests by Mr Trump's lawyers to exclude evidence from two women who made sexual abuse claims against Mr Trump in circumstances similar to those alleged by Carroll and from two people who worked at the department store at the time the rape allegedly occurred.

He also has ruled that jurors can hear misogynistic remarks Mr Trump made about women in 2005 on an Access Hollywood tape.
 
Last edited:
In the 2005 hot mic "Access Hollywood" video, Trump can be heard saying, “I’m automatically attracted to beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything,” he said, including “grab ‘em by the p----.”

The judge noted that Trump has dismissed his comments in the tape as "locker room talk" and might be able to make other arguments about what he was saying as well, but at this point "a jury could reasonably find" that "Trump admitted in the Access Hollywood tape that he has in fact had contact with women's genitalia in the past without their consent, or that he has attempted to do so."

The judge used the same rationale to say he would also allow testimony from two other women who say Trump sexually assaulted them, Jessica Leeds and Natasha Stoynoff.

In her deposition in the case, Leeds testified that Trump started groping her and putting his hand up her skirt when she was seated next to him in a flight from Texas to New York in 1979, the judge wrote. She said she was able to free herself and move to another seat.

Leeds said she ran into Trump at some point afterwards in New York, and he told her, “I remember you. You’re the c--- from the airplane.”

"Mr. Trump has claimed Ms. Leeds is a liar and that such event ever occurred. And he will be entitled to make that argument to the jury," the judge wrote.

Stoynoff testified she had her encounter with Trump in 2005, when she went to interview him and his wife, Melania, for People magazine.

She said he offered to show her a painting in one of the rooms and then closed the door behind her, grabbed her shoulders, "pushed me against this wall and starts kissing me."

She said she pushed him back twice before he was interrupted by a butler coming into the room.

 

Carroll alleges that Trump raped her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s. Trump denied the claims by stating Carroll wasn’t his “type.” That remark sparked Carroll’s initial defamation lawsuit, but she has since filed another for sexual battery under New York’s Adult Survivors Act. During his deposition, Trump spelled out the subtext of his initial remark, claiming that he didn’t find Carroll attractive. However, Trump mistook a photograph of Carroll with one of his ex-wife Marla Maples during the same questioning.
 

Carroll alleges that Trump raped her in the dressing room of a Bergdorf Goodman in the mid-1990s. Trump denied the claims by stating Carroll wasn’t his “type.” That remark sparked Carroll’s initial defamation lawsuit, but she has since filed another for sexual battery under New York’s Adult Survivors Act. During his deposition, Trump spelled out the subtext of his initial remark, claiming that he didn’t find Carroll attractive. However, Trump mistook a photograph of Carroll with one of his ex-wife Marla Maples during the same questioning.
Does he rape only women who are "his type"?
 

Trump’s attorney Joe Tacopina told Law&Crime that the former president hasn’t made any decision about whether he would attend.

Trump doesn’t appear on Carroll’s proposed witness list, but the former president is the first name on his own defense list.

Carroll’s legal team may choose to eliminate the uncertainty of live testimony by deploying the “incredibly damning” deposition testimony.

“The deposition is a known quantity,” Epner noted. “She can just press play and get the information out there that defendant Trump mistook E. Jean Carroll, who he constantly said wasn’t his type, for Marla Maples, the woman he considered so beautiful that he left his wife of decades in order to be with her.”

Epner added that the photographs of Carroll and Maples were “roughly contemporaneous.”
 
So, the accuser/victim has the dress from the assault, from 1993, with DNA on it from the perpetrator, Donald Trump?

That is 30 years ago. She saved the dress, intact, not washed, with the DNA? That seems to be a problem, as there is no chain of custody, from the date of the alleged assault. Unless she reported the assault to LEO at the time, and the dress has been kept in evidence by LEO, since that date.
 
So, the accuser/victim has the dress from the assault, from 1993, with DNA on it from the perpetrator, Donald Trump?

That is 30 years ago. She saved the dress, intact, not washed, with the DNA? That seems to be a problem, as there is no chain of custody, from the date of the alleged assault. Unless she reported the assault to LEO at the time, and the dress has been kept in evidence by LEO, since that date.

Excerpt:
A federal judge on Wednesday rejected former President Donald J. Trump’s offer of DNA evidence, saying Mr. Trump’s legal team was trying to stall the upcoming trial in the rape case that the writer E. Jean Carroll brought against him last fall.

The judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of U.S. District Court in Manhattan, noted that the offer last week came after a deadline to disclose evidence and one day after the parties had filed a joint order making clear that they would not call any DNA experts as witnesses. It was part of a pattern of tactics deployed by Mr. Trump the “effect and probable purpose of which” has been to delay a trial set for April, he said.

Judge Kaplan said the stalling was notable “in view of the fact that Ms. Carroll now is 79 years old,” a point the judge has raised in the past, adding that “there is no justification for such a deal.”
 
@lawofruby


NEW: Trump asks SDNY Judge Lew Kaplan to postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation/assault trial until late May. Why? Because of the substantial publicity surrounding the Manhattan DA’s recent indictment.


 

Attachments

  • IMG_9681.jpeg
    IMG_9681.jpeg
    177.1 KB · Views: 3
  • IMG_9682.jpeg
    IMG_9682.jpeg
    88.1 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
@lawofruby


NEW: Trump asks SDNY Judge Lew Kaplan to postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation/assault trial until late May. Why? Because of the substantial publicity surrounding the Manhattan DA’s recent indictment.



Summary: Don't make me show up in court for this crime because it looks bad that I have been in court recently for my other crimes. :rolleyes:

MOO.
 
@lawofruby


NEW: Trump asks SDNY Judge Lew Kaplan to postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation/assault trial until late May. Why? Because of the substantial publicity surrounding the Manhattan DA’s recent indictment.




Carroll's lawyer said a response to the request for a delay will be filed in a letter to the judge.

 

Are you on Truth Social? What cable news network do you watch? Have you ever used the hashtag #BelieveAllWomen when discussing sexual assault?

With just weeks to go before E. Jean Carroll’srape trial against Donald Trump in New York, lawyers on both sides are figuring out what questions to ask prospective jurors. And while some questions are the run-of-the-mill kind used to screen biased jurors, a fair share highlight the bizarre nature of the case involving the country’s most divisive politician.

As such, the stakes are high for weeding out MAGA types and Trump haters. And the questions they plan to ask at jury selection indicate as much, half a dozen legal scholars told The Daily Beast.

“He’s trying to poison the well a little bit and plant seeds in the jurors' minds. He’s warming them up before he even talks to them,” noted Aviva Orenstein, a law school professor at Indiana University Bloomington.

However, Orenstein noted that unlike New York state courts, judges in federal court normally screen jurors with lawyers’ suggested questions—and no self-respecting judge would ask a leading question like that.

“I’d ask, ‘What is your opinion of #metoo?’” she said.

Both sides’ proposed lists include several questions on a person’s feelings about alleged sexual assault, and scoring open-minded jurors who haven’t already labeled Trump a sc***bag will be difficult. At trial, Carroll’s lawyers are hoping to convince jurors that Trump’s abundant history of misogynist comments paint the picture of a serial sexual predator protected by his entitlement and wealth.

Trump’s lawyers also want to engage in what several legal scholars noted was a blatant litmus test for people’s politics: dredging up the debacle that was the Senate’s contentious confirmation of Trump’s Supreme Court pick in 2018, Brett Kavanaugh. After he underwent a surface-level FBI background check, it was journalists who documented Kavanaugh’s long history of alleged sexual misconduct—including one episode in high school, where a prep school student recalled him drunkenly pinning her down in a bed while covering up her mouth so she couldn’t scream.

At Carroll’s trial later this month, Trump’s lawyers want to ask: “Are you familiar with the allegations made against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh before he was confirmed to the Court?”

There is something that attorneys for both Trump and Carroll are itching to know: where these New Yorkers hang out online. Carroll’s team is keen to identify anyone who joined Trump when he got booted off Twitter and launched his own social media network—a relatively small batch that was estimated at 513,000 active daily users last year.

“Is there anyone who uses or has used the social media platform Truth Social?” Carroll’s lawyers have proposed asking.

Meanwhile, Trump’s team wants prospective jurors to list every social platform they’re on. But they stopped short of asking for potential candidates’ usernames, which could be seen as an offensive intrusion of privacy.

Carroll’s lawyers seem intent on using the jury selection process to point out how Trump is also under criminal investigation, with proposed questions probing people’s familiarity with the Manhattan District Attorney’s criminal case against him for faking business records to hide his hush money payment to 🤬🤬🤬🤬 star Stormy Daniels and the Justice Department’s investigation into his hoarding of classified documents at his Florida oceanside estate of Mar-a-Lago.

Carroll’s lawyers are trying to screen the crazies who still parrot Trump’s unfounded claims that he lost the 2020 election to President Joe Biden unfairly.

“Is there anyone who believes the results of the 2020 Presidential Election are illegitimate?”her lawyers hope to ask.

Gershman doubts that the federal judge will allow it, though.

But he stressed that it’s a question worth asking—along with a person’s views about alleged sexual assault.
 
Last edited:
In the defamation case:


The D.C. Court of Appeals has declined to answer whether then-President Donald Trump was acting within the scope of his employment when he allegedly defamed writer E Jean Carroll when denying her rape claim.

On Thursday the D.C. Court of Appeals, which has jurisdiction over federal employees, returned the question to federal court in New York, where Carroll brought the suit.

"We have never adopted a rule that has determined that a certain type of conduct is per se within (or outside of) the scope of employment, and we decline to do so now," the court said.

The opinion leaves in limbo whether the case can go forward, but Carroll filed a second lawsuit in November alleging defamation and battery that is scheduled for trial April 25.
 
@lawofruby


NEW: Trump asks SDNY Judge Lew Kaplan to postpone E. Jean Carroll’s defamation/assault trial until late May. Why? Because of the substantial publicity surrounding the Manhattan DA’s recent indictment.



In response to the request, Carroll’s lawyer urged Kaplan not to grant the delay, arguing the claims were meritless and will provide Trump more opportunity to avoid the Manhattan federal trial.

“Trump’s mounting legal difficulties have given rise to substantial press coverage and will continue to do so; he is not only a former President, but also a declared candidate in the next presidential election,” attorney Roberta Kaplan wrote.

“As a result, each passing week will offer Trump yet another straw to grasp at in his campaign to avoid standing trial for sexually assaulting Carroll,” she added.

 
So, the accuser/victim has the dress from the assault, from 1993, with DNA on it from the perpetrator, Donald Trump?

That is 30 years ago. She saved the dress, intact, not washed, with the DNA? That seems to be a problem, as there is no chain of custody, from the date of the alleged assault. Unless she reported the assault to LEO at the time, and the dress has been kept in evidence by LEO, since that date.

True there is an issue with the chain. But, if she has had the dress all these years AND there is Mr. Trump's DNA, how would she have gotten his DNA to place it on the dress? At the very least, if it is his DNA, they had some sort of encounter. Mr. Trump denies ever having had an encounter with her as I understand it as she is not his type.
 
So, the accuser/victim has the dress from the assault, from 1993, with DNA on it from the perpetrator, Donald Trump?

That is 30 years ago. She saved the dress, intact, not washed, with the DNA? That seems to be a problem, as there is no chain of custody, from the date of the alleged assault. Unless she reported the assault to LEO at the time, and the dress has been kept in evidence by LEO, since that date.

I think it establishes the truth of what happened and that she is a credible witness. It was such a significant event that she never let go of the evidence even though years have passed by.
 
#45 could stay in the race quietly (lol, I know, I know!) defeat all these racist traitors and their lying charges against him and his exemplary name and make a triumphant return and win his throne and crown back! Easy Peasy! Your welcome! IMO
 

Former President Donald Trump is asking a judge to delay trial set to being later this month after learning that a billionaire who has donated to Democratic causes has paid for some of the accuser's legal fees.

The information came to light recently when lawyers for E Jean Carroll informed Trump's attorneys that "at some point, her counsel secured additional funding from a nonprofit organization to offset certain expenses and legal fees."

Trump's attorneys said the backer is Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, who has a nonprofit.

On Wednesday, a different Trump attorney asked the judge to delay the trial until late May given the publicity around Trump's indictment.

Carroll's lawyers opposed any delay. Carroll's attorney said the financial support from the nonprofit came in 2020 -- one year after Carroll filed her state court lawsuit and is "irrelevant" to the issues in the case.

Trump's lawyer asked the judge to reopen discovery, delay the trial one month, or instruct the jury of adverse inference instruction. It's the second request by a Trump lawyer to delay the trial, which is scheduled to start on April 25.
 

A federal judge rejected a request Thursday to delay former President Donald Trump's trial this month on civil claims that he raped a woman in the mid-1990s, but he has granted a request by Trump's lawyers to gather more evidence about who is paying the accuser's lawyers.

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan said he would allow lawyers for Trump to gather more information and to question Carroll for up to one hour about why she said in an October deposition that her lawyers were relying on a contingency fee in the case and were not receiving other income.

Roberta Kaplan said her client was preparing for trial recently when she recalled hearing that her lawyers, who were operating on a contingency fee basis, had also secured funding from a nonprofit organization. Carroll's lawyers then notified Trump's lawyers, who demanded to know the source of the funding.
 
Meanwhile, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals released a written opinion Thursday providing additional legal insight that the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals can use to decide if the United States can be substituted for Trump as the defendant in a defamation lawsuit Carroll filed before her November rape lawsuit.

The 2nd Circuit had asked the D.C. court to provide insight into a law addressing when an employer should be liable for the actions of its employee.

The D.C. court said it lacked facts to recommend whether it believed that allegedly libelous statements Trump made after Carroll's rape claims became public fell within the scope of his employment as president.

It did attempt to clarify the law, though it noted that most of its case law on the subject pertained to disputes over whether law enforcement individuals could be held personally liable.

The defamation lawsuit eventually will be dismissed if the United States is substituted as a defendant, and a trial might become unnecessary otherwise because the November rape lawsuit also contains a defamation claim against Trump.

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
461
Total visitors
563

Forum statistics

Threads
625,638
Messages
18,507,408
Members
240,828
Latest member
inspector_gadget_
Back
Top