Not everything Giuffre says should be taken at face value, either. There's no doubt she was trafficked, but her allegations of who she was trafficked to have had mixed results... At one end, Prince Andrew doesn't come off as believable in the slightest; at the other, she very likely lied about Alan Derschowitz. There's certainly evidence being withheld that would destroy many powerful people who deserve to be destroyed (politicians on both sides of the aisle and internationally, although even moreso, the "donor class"... business, media, academia, PACs, "think tanks", etc), but the extent to which he was using it for blackmail is highly speculative. While Epstein was certainly brazen and reckless (a painting of Bill in Monica's dress, naming his jet the "Lolita Express"), an actual list of evidence against everyone he was blackmailing just seems too stupid for such a supposedly elaborate and sophisticated scheme. To quote Tony Soprano, "Why not just leave them a f'n urine sample?"
Whatever the "list" is, it could be in a variety of forms. The rest of his flight logs maybe. Or, it could be a list of evidence against various people, but actually made by the FBI once they got ahold of it (because the actual contents would be a crime just to view). A financial "client list" would be just Leslie Wexner. We already have his address book, but that doesn't actually tell us much, because the contacts have a wide range of potential power and culpability... Everything from heads of state to caterers.
www.bbc.com
