- Joined
- Aug 14, 2018
- Messages
- 12,747
- Reaction score
- 144,589
I guess it’s just that I’m from a small community too, and I can’t really picture people in my area getting so involved in something revolving around outsiders (bc the TB family are outsiders, even if they’ve lived there for a while). We certainly have some local crazies, but AFAIK we don’t have an equivalent to “start your day with yeh”.
Right? Such hypocrites. Whatever they do, those very... creative? names of them will show up connected to this case whenever someone Googles their names. If they ever try to get a job outside of their bubble, that will be the first bit of information that will show up about them. Trying to rent a house? There it is.I really don't get it. For a year the TBs have been claiming to have irrefutable evidence of corruption by county officials and departments, threatening to disclose all during the trial. They said the media will be "ravenous" to see all this evidence.
They claim they have proof of the EMTs killing Evanna, proof of the DSS commissioner going on "dates" - their word not mine - with their 12 year old daughter, proof of a drunken attorney conspiring with the judge, yet ended up pleading guilty to child endangerment in order to "resolve" things so they could move on?
Why didn't they exercise their right to a speedy trial and get down to it then? Even with delays caused by the coronavirus they could insist on a reasonable court date. They've been okay with leaving the kids in DSS custody while they ranted and raved about "calumny" instead of actually working to get the kids home.
They were given a golden opportunity to finally bring their evidence to trial and show how they were victimized.
It may be a misdemeanor but it's still child endangerment. That conviction will follow them for years to come. Just wait until they try and make the same accusations the next time DSS has to step in to protect the kids. Assuming they ever get them back that is. MOO.
Ryan Torres was one of the adults that lived at the house at the time of Evanna’s death. Apparently, there were other adults living there at the time, they’re lucky they didn’t get slapped with a charge too. He was a parental figure to Venuska’s kids, he’s the father of two of them.I’m hoping that the younger TB teen/adult with no children are reading here. They need better representation by the law. IMO, they should be represented as children obeying the only thing they knew and their lives should not be destroyed by their parents actions. This is so messed up. I hope that CPS is able to go against the plea deal to keep the little kids safe. What kind of parent or lawyer agrees with throwing their own kids under the bus for the same conviction?
Could someone explain what Torres has to do do with this? He’s the father of V’s two youngest kids.? Does he live in the home? Why would he be charged the same?
The author of that page seems to have a personal vendetta against the family rather than a reporter of "nightly news."Is there something in the water up there? No shade, but some of the locals seem .... intense. Jmo
I really don't get it. For a year the TBs have been claiming to have irrefutable evidence of corruption by county officials and departments, threatening to disclose all during the trial. They said the media will be "ravenous" to see all this evidence.
They claim they have proof of the EMTs killing Evanna, proof of the DSS commissioner going on "dates" - their word not mine - with their 12 year old daughter, proof of a drunken attorney conspiring with the judge, yet ended up pleading guilty to child endangerment in order to "resolve" things so they could move on?
Why didn't they exercise their right to a speedy trial and get down to it then? Even with delays caused by the coronavirus they could insist on a reasonable court date. They've been okay with leaving the kids in DSS custody while they ranted and raved about "calumny" instead of actually working to get the kids home.
They were given a golden opportunity to finally bring their evidence to trial and show how they were victimized.
It may be a misdemeanor but it's still child endangerment. That conviction will follow them for years to come. Just wait until they try and make the same accusations the next time DSS has to step in to protect the kids. Assuming they ever get them back that is. MOO.
The author of that page seems to have a personal vendetta against the family rather than a reporter of "nightly news."
I wonder if the family will continue to pursue their claims that people connected to the case participated in on-line defamation of them. They did say that they had proof and the truth would be revealed in the end.
Or, maybe part of the agreement to plead to lower charges was that they stop making accusations against DSS and the EMT worker? Imo
Agreed!well we all know the “proof” is a lie. Because they made accusations of WS members being locals, which isn’t true at all. So the rest of their “proof” is 99.9% fake too. Jmo
I thought the drama was over until the February sentencing but once again the family just can't stay quiet. Now they're complaining that they still don't have the children back and DSS is proposing some sort of situation of returns and removals - not sure what that means. Maybe temporary home visits?
They're complaining that DSS wants psychological evaluations and services before they'll consider any action. So thank goodness for small favors.
And of course they remind us again of the "slapping and abuse" still being done to the kids even as they say they're trying to work with DSS "in good faith."
They also said they were able to send the kids some homemade food for the first time.
Tranberg Bennett
I thought the drama was over until the February sentencing but once again the family just can't stay quiet. Now they're complaining that they still don't have the children back and DSS is proposing some sort of situation of returns and removals - not sure what that means. Maybe temporary home visits?
They're complaining that DSS wants psychological evaluations and services before they'll consider any action. So thank goodness for small favors.
And of course they remind us again of the "slapping and abuse" still being done to the kids even as they say they're trying to work with DSS "in good faith."
They also said they were able to send the kids some homemade food for the first time.
Tranberg Bennett
Yes, they might be referring to a visitation schedule. The children will probably have some kind of structured visitation before the parents are given custody again. They may even start with supervised visitation and then move to weekend visits or something like that.I thought the drama was over until the February sentencing but once again the family just can't stay quiet. Now they're complaining that they still don't have the children back and DSS is proposing some sort of situation of returns and removals - not sure what that means. Maybe temporary home visits?
They're complaining that DSS wants psychological evaluations and services before they'll consider any action. So thank goodness for small favors.
And of course they remind us again of the "slapping and abuse" still being done to the kids even as they say they're trying to work with DSS "in good faith."
They also said they were able to send the kids some homemade food for the first time.
Tranberg Bennett
IMO the family will not be happy to undergo any psychological evaluations of themselves or the children as the results are out of their control. Unlike their prior claims of "evidence" that never materialized in court any psyche evals will be admitted into record.Yes, they might be referring to a visitation schedule. The children will probably have some kind of structured visitation before the parents are given custody again. They may even start with supervised visitation and then move to weekend visits or something like that.
I don't think CPS is going to make it easy for them. If the children are evaluated and therapy is recommended, the family will have to cooperate.
Since they are the ones who claimed the children are being abused and traumatized in foster care, I would think they would welcome psychological evaluations for the children. Imo
Oh, I'm sure they won't like it.IMO the family will not be happy to undergo any psychological evaluations of themselves or the children as the results are out of their control. Unlike their prior claims of "evidence" that never materialized in court any psyche evals will be admitted into record.
I hope and pray that the DSS holds their feet to the fire, and has the entire family going through counseling as well as parenting, nutrition and CPR classes.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.