LL8511
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2012
- Messages
- 376
- Reaction score
- 1
I don't think the affair by itself was the motive. The affair + x could = motive. Not saying that it didn't contribute or even spawn the x. If the prosecution has only a circumstantial case, then I would think there needs to be an explanation of the x.
Do you think
X could be that ES moved back home with husband and he thought he was losing her which in his mind would be Jen's fault.
If he was planning to just get thru Xmas and then divorce something happened.
Or possibly she caught them together the day she was supposed to go to the mall?
Or they planned it and ES moving home was part of the plan?
I'm with you I hope the DA has the X
Solus ....Does any one of these X make more sense ..... in talking with GR or the OW?
Here is a reminder of the other X's from South
‘x’ = GR wanting to keep the house, and keep the children
‘x’ = Jen seeking advice elsewhere
‘x’ = Jen never agreeing to give up the children or their home
‘x’ = Jen seeking child support
‘x’ = life insurance policy on Jen
‘x’ = GR losing his cool when he realized things weren’t going to go exactly as he planned
Solus let me just say I'm very sorry you have been put in this situation! I can only imagine how difficult it must be for you!