- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 7,232
- Reaction score
- 114
This decision disgusts me, by the way. Can't even bring myself to say more than that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NY Post: Man in choke-hold death had no throat damage
http://nypost.com/2014/07/19/man-in-chokehold-death-had-no-throat-damage-autopsy/
According to the autopsy there was no damage to the decedents windpipe or neck-bones.
What this suggests to me is that the so-called "choke-hold" was not an actual "air choke" (referred to as a "true choke") which involves compression of the upper airway (trachea, larynx or laryngopharynx) leading to asphyxia. IMO this calls into question the findings of the autopsy which concluded that the "choke-hold" contributed to Garners death.
More than likely what killed Garner was the compression of his chest as he was face down with about four officers on top of him. This is known as "positional asphyxia"(or postural asphyxia) and it is leading cause of death for persons in police custody.
This is why I believe the GJ voted not to indict. Only one officer was charged - the officer who applied the "choke-hold" and it is very likely that his actions did not cause the death of Garner. Rather it was the other officers whose collective weight bore down on Garner as he lay face down who were most responsible. All of these officers were granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony.
This decision disgusts me, by the way. Can't even bring myself to say more than that.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Read Kevin's post above. They might have charged the wrong person.
In the video they say he was breathing
One inconvenient fact is that chokeholds are against policy in NYC. JMO
Oh yes I know, I heard that but I didn't see any of them checking to see if he was breathing. He was unresponsive, somebody should have been continually checking not only to see IF he was breathing, but the quality of breath. I would like to see the autopsy but I am betting that this man could have been saved.
NY Post: Man in choke-hold death had no throat damage
http://nypost.com/2014/07/19/man-in-chokehold-death-had-no-throat-damage-autopsy/
According to the autopsy there was no damage to the decedents windpipe or neck-bones.
What this suggests to me is that the so-called "choke-hold" was not an actual "air choke" (referred to as a "true choke") which involves compression of the upper airway (trachea, larynx or laryngopharynx) leading to asphyxia. IMO this calls into question the findings of the autopsy which concluded that the "choke-hold" contributed to Garners death.
More than likely what killed Garner was the compression of his chest as he was face down with about four officers on top of him. This is known as "positional asphyxia"(or postural asphyxia) and it is leading cause of death for persons in police custody.
This is why I believe the GJ voted not to indict. Only one officer was charged - the officer who applied the "choke-hold" and it is very likely that his actions did not cause the death of Garner. Rather it was the other officers whose collective weight bore down on Garner as he lay face down who were most responsible. All of these officers were granted immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony.
We have a system in this country, and part of it is law enforcement. If they ask you to do something, you do it. If they want to cuff you, let them.You can scream 'don't touch me' and fight the cuffs, but generally it's not going to end well for you. What would the charges or penality have been for the cigeratte selling?
Another thing is the grand jury and trial system. I believe like 23 people heard the evidence and decided it was justified. No indictment. OK, you don't like it,but that's how it is. If it was now took to court, would the jury of 12, all 12, have seen it any different? Or or we now advocating that black defendants don't go thru the same system as the rest of us?
I'm so tired of all this. I'm tired of news coverage that never uses the phrase 'resisting arrest'. They use the phrase 'unarmed black teen' but never add 'that was allegedly assaulting a police officer' Wake up people, you are not making things better.
I guess we can dismantle LE in this country and let everyone fend for them selves, then I guess whoever has the most weapons will win.
Oh yes I know, I heard that but I didn't see any of them checking to see if he was breathing. He was unresponsive, somebody should have been continually checking not only to see IF he was breathing, but the quality of breath. I would like to see the autopsy but I am betting that this man could have been saved.
And why for at least 7 minutes, did no one perform CPR ? I understand they are waiting for the EMTs to arrive but no one could just try a bit of mouth to mouth ? I feel like if someone had given him some air, he may very well have survived. Are LEO's trained in CPR ? Are LEO"s allowed to administer CPR ? Does anyone know ? TIA
Since none of us were there or personally know the family, I can only rely on reports like this:
"At the time of his death, the Port Richmond resident had three misdemeanor cases pending in Stapleton Criminal Court. He was free on $2,000 bail.
On Aug. 22 of last year, Garner was arrested on School Road and Bay Street, Fort Wadsworth, for allegedly driving without a license, according to a criminal complaint.
Garner, 43, gave cops a phony name and put himself in more hot water when officers allegedly found untaxed cigarettes and a small amount of marijuana in the 1998 Lincoln Navigator he was driving, the complaint said.
He was charged with aggravated unlicensed vehicle operation, false personation, possession or sale of untaxed cigarettes and marijuana possession, according to information from District Attorney Daniel Donovan's office.
Seven months later, while out on $1,000 bail, Garner was busted on March 28 for allegedly selling unstamped cigarettes on the street outside of 200 Bay St., Tompkinsville. He had 24 packs of untaxed smokes in his possession, police said.
Full article here:
http://www.silive.com/northshore/index.ssf/2014/07/eric_garner_who_died_in_police.html
The article is not a blog, but rather a Staten Island news source.
Thanks for bringing up this article. So they stamp boxes to mark they are taxed after you pay for them? I'm a non-smoker so I'm not sure how this works.
Was Eric Garner actually being arrested for selling cigarettes when he died? I know he has a history of that, but when you watch the video he is talking about breaking up a fight.
Thanks for bringing up this article. So they stamp boxes to mark they are taxed after you pay for them? I'm a non-smoker so I'm not sure how this works.
You would certainly think they would be trained in CPR, someone on here must know that answer. Could it be because of fear of disease, so they wait for the EMTs? I really don't know.