GUILTY NY - Sean "Diddy" Combs guilty re prostitution charges but NG of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, 17 Sept 2024


Prosecution and defense want jury to continue deliberating
Both the prosecution and defense want the judge to push the jury to continue deliberating.

Sean “Diddy” Combs’ attorney Marc Agnifilo said the defense would like the judge to bring out the jury to instruct them to continue deliberating rather than sending them a note. They are going to work on the wording of that instruction
 
Why would the defence want the jury to deliberate more on that one count they can’t agree on? Because wouldn’t that mean he can’t go to jail for that specific count as they can’t send someone to jail when not found guilty?
 
Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy
The government charged Combs with violating the racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations conspiracy act by conspiring with a “criminal enterprise” to carry out a pattern of illegal behavior.

Prosecutors accused Combs of running a criminal enterprise, comprised of his staff and associates, to commit crimes including sex trafficking, kidnapping, forced labor, bribery, arson, and obstruction of justice since at least 2008.

This was done, according to the government, so Combs could abuse, threaten and coerce women and others around him to fulfill his sexual desire while also protecting his reputation by concealing his behavior.

RICO laws were created in 1970 to prosecute people involved in organized crime, such as Mafia members.

The charge carries a maximum sentence of life in prison – the most severe punishment out of any of the charges.
Explaining the charges against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs

Because count I is the most serious of all the charges IMO. The RICO statute (conspiracy/racketeering)

That is the one Count the government would most like to see a guilty verdict on.

Each of the charges against Combs carries a potential prison sentence. He can be found guilty or not guilty of one, some or all the charges.

ETA I think the defense is banking on their client receiving Not Guilty verdict across the board.
 
Last edited:
I completely would vote for the "Racketeering" charge. It is obvious he paid his employees to conspire in illegal activities. They carried illegal drugs for him, they were his "baby oil" mules. I forgot the name of his former assistant, who testified, Mia, everything she testified to, supports the Racketeering charge.
 
I haven't been following this very closely but I did hear about a letter from the jury about one juror who wasn't following rules. Whatever happened about that? I think it happened Monday?
I haven’t seen any more about that juror. The note asked the judge to talk to him, so perhaps it got straightened out.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
173
Guests online
561
Total visitors
734

Forum statistics

Threads
626,761
Messages
18,533,187
Members
241,119
Latest member
SteveH
Back
Top