Are there laws that requires a rifle to be locked up?
In many states there are laws that hold the caretakers of children responsible for securing dangerous weapons and keeping them out of reach of children, unless supervised, I believe.
BBM
Nope.
In the last couple of years the killers seem to be younger and younger.
IMO
We sure have seen a lot of these cases lately. However, having been an American Studies major (the most fun major ever), I have studied a lot of social history, criminal, etc., and there have been gruesome child killers all along. Nevertheless, when times were simpler, and kids had more responsibility, and news was slower, no access to violent films and games, no access to fast transportation, more of an emphasis on personal responsibility and being a good citizen, I think the overall environment made it less likely for a child to commit such an act. I don't know the stats of whether there are more now, when taking into account the increase in population, but it's possible, given the change in our society.
I taught Behaviorally/Emotionally disturbed children for a year back in 2000. We had 8 students and a padded room in the classroom because these children were violent and a threat to harm others. One wore cowboy boots each day and was placed in our class after stomping on his teachers feet with those darn boots. These kids were so angry that they just wanted to hurt somebody. They were very impulsive, but unlike most childish impulses, their impulses tended to be violent.
I thought of those students when I read about this boy shooting his mom. There is alot going on in this boy's mind. I wonder if the school had referred him to any kind of special services considering his history of violence in the school environment. If not, they dropped the ball, IMO.
It doesn't necessarily change the course of a violent child's life to receive these types of school services. One of my former student's is now serving a sentence for most of his adult life for raping beating and robbing a woman when he was 18. Damien was the cutest little dark brown boy with a funny humor and a little man voice. He also had issues with white people. He told me one day "I don't have to listen to no white teacher." I responded by "telling him that people are like m&m's, we are all different colors on the outside but on the inside we are all the same". His victim was a white woman. The DA said after the trial that even though he claimed remorse at the trial, they had him on camera joking and laughing about his crime and how he eluded police for awhile.
Is it possible that some people are born without a conscience?
Sorry for the personal story but this particular crime brought back a flood of memories for me. I still think and worry about those students from so long ago who taught me so much.
So sad that this young man killed his own mother. It is hard to understand. And MizzIzzy, I agree with you. I bet he wants his mother.
MOO
wm
I don't know if I really believe kids can be born without the ability to acquire a conscience. I think Grainne Dhu summed it up eloquently. So many factors go into turning a kid into a killer. I have read that, for example, many serial killers had suffered some sort of head injury at some point in their lives. Also, many suffered abuse as well of some form. In Ted Bundy's case, there were some experts who believed he and his family were hiding some aspects of his childhood. I know he was raised as his mother's child but he was actually biologically his "sister's" kid. There was some strangeness going on there, is my point. I believe that kids develop into monsters due to various factors but are probably not just born that way. But I don't know for sure.
As far as this kids' access to guns is concerned, many posters have summed up my feelings. A kid with behavioral problems should not have access to any obvious weapons. And such a kid should have intensive intervention and possibly placement outside the home if the parents cannot adequately supervise them. Problem is, I have heard numerous stories about parents with disturbed kids who cannot afford the serious intervention they need and most insurance plans won't pay for hospitalization until the kid hurts someone.
I also think that American kids today, in general, should not have any unsupervised access to guns regardless of whether they are disturbed or not because most kids today are too immature to handle the responsibility. There have been too many accidents at the hands of unsupervised kids with guns. Most kids today are not as self-sufficient or responsible as kids used to be. They don't need to work or hunt to survive for the most part. They remain very vulnerable and less able to control impulses as a result.
Nevertheless, a kid disturbed enough to shoot his own mother would likely have ended up doing something horrible to someone at some point regardless of his access to firearms. I recall a case in Colorado years a go where a 13 year old stabbed two little girls to death in their home. It appeared he had been hunting someone to hurt that day before he ever got to their door. Horrible. But guns are so quick and easy.
What may be good news is that according to one of the best experts around as to psychopaths/sociopaths, while treatment is useless for adults with these personality disorders, tests show that the young brain may be malleable enough for treatment to work and actually change their wiring, if they are young enough when they begin treatment.