- Joined
- Dec 21, 2018
- Messages
- 13,066
- Reaction score
- 103,519
Ann, you bring up good points on questions we have relating to the forged custody documents.
What I wonder is if the R's even knew about the documents. HMR would certainly know if her signature had been forged and I think the rest of the R family would realize there was no way HMR would have signed those papers.
Maybe the R's were the ones that had something to hold over the W4's heads?
The date on the 2 indictments (related to forged custody documents) is April 3, 2016. Does that mean it was the date written on the documents? Or does it mean it was the date the forged documents were presented to LE?
That's a good question as to how LE even knew about the docs. One of the indictments refers to presenting a copy known to be fake (paraphrasing) to LE. Was that done on 4/3/2016?
In the Secondary discovery documents, there is a piece of evidence titled "Declaration Forms" I'm guessing those are the forms they needed to complete to enter/leave the US/Canada. Maybe they needed to present the custody documents then and border agents made a copy?
It seems as though just when we think we have something figured out, it creates so many more questions! And then when the trials come around, we will likely be left with our jaws wide open saying - well I certainly didn't see that coming!!
The fake child custody documents wouldn't work with the Rhodens alive. The Rhodens would know they were fake.
The custody papers (just my 2 cents) were to help the Wags after the murders. They knew the finger would point at them over custody, but the custody papers take away their motive for the murders.
They thought they could say "hey, we had no reason to want Hanna and her family out of the picture---see these custody papers prove it!"
However, it completely backfired on them and defeated their purpose. The forged documents make them look guilty.
Last edited: