OH - Pike County: 8 people from one family dead as police hunt for killer(s) #19

[GTAWmom]

I'm not familiar with Tapatalk but if IIRC it does have those options. I'm on a pc so what do I know, lol. Maybe another user can share the info. On my display 'edit post' is a pencil, to the left of the reply option (arrow). (It shows as Edit post, reply, reply with quote, and reply with multiple quotes -- left to right.)

Let me check...

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[GTAWmom]

Let me check...

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

I can edit but not delete.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[CARIIS]

Maybe not on this phone app....

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

Was the post your trying to do whatever (!) to over an hour ago??

I am pretty sure the "edit" time is set by WS - 60 min. I do not think it has anything to do with what device you get to website. If the post was over and hour ago you wont be able to do anything to the post, IIRC!!

 

[GTAWmom]

I am pretty sure the "edit" time is set by WS - 60 min. I do not think it has anything to do with what device you get to website. If the post was over and hour ago you wont be able to do anything to the post, IIRC!!

Like I thought, another tapatalk user confirmed, you can edit but not delete.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[glf]

Ok glf, I went back and checked posts, and links that were posted. I did not see anywhere that it was mentioned that "Dana" was shot twice. Both links mentioned only stated about # of shots to CR1 and KR. So I don't know were that came from, maybe hec60504 could show the quote she/he found, bs I couldn't find it. But let's assume that the info is correct for a minute. If so, that means that the majority of shots to the victums were to the youngest people (besides CR1) FR, HHG, HR, and CRjr. IMO that means something. I always thought that the main target was CR1, and that (in my mind) the women and CRjr where not shot so many times because of their gender and age (maybe I just wanted to think that). I want to think that, but I'm not a killer. Who knows what went on in their minds. But if the real targets were the kids, that puts a different perspective on some of my theories.

I agree! I think that info could be important in helping determine age range of killers. Of course, it could be killers inexperience, which wouldn't necessarily make them young. I personally have never fired anything except a cap gun, so if somebody gave me a shot gun to defend myself with, I would probably be better off turning it around and using it like a baseball bat!

 

[CARIIS]

I agree! I think that info could be important in helping determine age range of killers. Of course, it could be killers inexperience, which wouldn't necessarily make them young. I personally have never fired anything except a cap gun, so if somebody gave me a shot gun to defend myself with, I would probably be better off turning it around and using it like a baseball bat!

You are not alone!!! And am quite fine with that!!

 

[grow73]

But the family members know how they died. They got the preliminary reports, just like we did. I mean, they died from being shot to death at close range. They know how many times and where, they went to their funerals. It's not like the autopsy is going to reveal some huge revelation that's going to change things for them. The family members are just not talking. The autopsy reports are not going to give them any answers as to "who" killed them, or "why". About the only thing it will tell them, that they don't already know, that they might want to know, is the results of the toxicology report. Personally, that would be the furthest thing from my mind in all of this. At this point, any alcohol, or other drug use, would be the least of my concerns. I also seriously doubt that they were all drugged, then murdered.

Well, people are different. The people I know who have experienced tragic losses have wanted to know every little detail. Maybe I misunderstood, but the quote from Tony Rhoden about LE keeping reports from them, led me to believe the family in this scenario, who really is the only family relevant, also feels this way.

 

[GTAWmom]

I believe I have found a very nice and interesting view to the inside of this family. Am I allowed to post links to any old things I find on line?

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[GTAWmom]

Well I don't know if anyone else has posted this link nor am I sure it's allowed but I guess it will be taken down if not.

https://flipagram.com/dana.l.rhoden

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[glf]

Well I don't know if anyone else has posted this link nor am I sure it's allowed but I guess it will be taken down if not.

https://flipagram.com/dana.l.rhoden

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

I have watched this, has some cute pics, the only thing I don't like about Flipagram, is it goes so fast I have to watch it three or four times to feel like I saw everything! Kinda like listening to a 331/3LP on 45. And maybe it's because I'm blind as a bat.

 

[CARIIS]

IMO, they just keep telling the truth by not telling anything!!

The tox reports are important IMO - are they drunk or loaded with heroin?

IMO, If Michael Jackson and Princes tox screens are released to the globe, which might impact a "legacy" - the Rhodens tox screens should be released like anyone else.

IMO it is not like about what is important to whom - it is about breaking the law, getting away with it, and our media not making a big stink about it.

That is IMO a huge issue, in the big picture moo

 

[GTAWmom]

Well I don't know if anyone else has posted this link nor am I sure it's allowed but I guess it will be taken down if not.

https://flipagram.com/dana.l.rhoden

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

There are 34 different albums of photos or flipagrams. I can't help noticing a few things like, the inside of the trailer. Which I'm not sure which one but maybe Dana's. Does anyone know where Hanna's baby shower was held? But also can't help but wonder if it's possible that some clues maybe hidden in there or even a picture of the killer/s....

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[glf]

There are 34 different albums of photos or flipagrams. I can't help noticing a few things like, the inside of the trailer. Which I'm not sure which one but maybe Dana's. Does anyone know where Hanna's baby shower was held? But also can't help but wonder if it's possible that some clues maybe hidden in there or even a picture of the killer/s....

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

I got the impression that the shower was at Dana's house, since she was the person giving the shower. That's usually the case, any time I've been to a shower, unless it's expected to be really big, and people tend to use a church facility or other place they can rent by the hour or day.
As far as wondering if somebody who attended the shower was involved in the killings, I really don't think so, but it is a possibility. As I've said before, I feel like the killers are from out of town.

 

[GTAWmom]

I got the impression that the shower was at Dana's house, since she was the person giving the shower. That's usually the case, any time I've been to a shower, unless it's expected to be really big, and people tend to use a church facility or other place they can rent by the hour or day.
As far as wondering if somebody who attended the shower was involved in the killings, I really don't think so, but it is a possibility. As I've said before, I feel like the killers are from out of town.

I wasn't implying the killer/s were at the baby shower. There are other many albums including a couple of them at a bar or night club. I'm just saying that there maybe clues amongst the many photos.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[glf]

I wasn't implying the killer/s were at the baby shower. There are other many albums including a couple of them at a bar or night club. I'm just saying that there maybe clues amongst the many photos.

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

I guess I really don't know how to use Flipagram to be able to go through dozens of "videos". And if it is any way connected with FB, then I'm up a creek.

 

[GTAWmom]

I guess I really don't know how to use Flipagram to be able to go through dozens of "videos". And if it is any way connected with FB, then I'm up a creek.

All you have to do is scroll down to see the other albums.[emoji4]

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk

 

[rsd1200]

Well, people are different. The people I know who have experienced tragic losses have wanted to know every little detail. Maybe I misunderstood, but the quote from Tony Rhoden about LE keeping reports from them, led me to believe the family in this scenario, who really is the only family relevant, also feels this way.

Well, then each of the deceased's, legal next of kin, needs to go file a request for a copy of the autopsy. It would appear that none of them have done that. Just like Tony said they are keeping the g-grandchildren from his mother, yet, she has apparently not filed the motion to have visits with them. Tony cannot go and just pick up all of the autopsy reports. He can't pick up any of them. He's not next of kin for his two brothers. His mother is next of kin for CR1 and KR. Those are the only two that she can request. We are only hearing from Tony too.

 

[jk204]

Well, then each of the deceased's, legal next of kin, needs to go file a request for a copy of the autopsy. It would appear that none of them have done that. Just like Tony said they are keeping the g-grandchildren from his mother, yet, she has apparently not filed the motion to have visits with them. Tony cannot go and just pick up all of the autopsy reports. He can't pick up any of them. He's not next of kin for his two brothers. His mother is next of kin for CR1 and KR. Those are the only two that she can request. We are only hearing from Tony too.

Why do you think they haven't had access? Because they don't want to or because they were told it should be best for them not to? Could it be that, for a specific reason in the investigation, a judge has decided not to release it?

Looks to me too, like someone in the family is in the scenario

 

[grow73]

Well, then each of the deceased's, legal next of kin, needs to go file a request for a copy of the autopsy. It would appear that none of them have done that. Just like Tony said they are keeping the g-grandchildren from his mother, yet, she has apparently not filed the motion to have visits with them. Tony cannot go and just pick up all of the autopsy reports. He can't pick up any of them. He's not next of kin for his two brothers. His mother is next of kin for CR1 and KR. Those are the only two that she can request. We are only hearing from Tony too.

TR and KR2 are the two familymembers who've spoken with reporters lately, they are responsible for CR1 and KR's estates. I see them as sort of spokespersons for the Rhoden side of the family. I have no idea why they haven't filed the proper requests, what do you think? Don't they know how to? Does it require a lawyer that would cost a lot? Don't they want to know? Or have they filed them and then got denied? Or still waiting? I'm scratching my head on this one. And where are the Manleys?

 

[GTAWmom]

Well, then each of the deceased's, legal next of kin, needs to go file a request for a copy of the autopsy. It would appear that none of them have done that. Just like Tony said they are keeping the g-grandchildren from his mother, yet, she has apparently not filed the motion to have visits with them. Tony cannot go and just pick up all of the autopsy reports. He can't pick up any of them. He's not next of kin for his two brothers. His mother is next of kin for CR1 and KR. Those are the only two that she can request. We are only hearing from Tony too.

Are we just assuming they have not or is there something stating they have not? Just curious...

Sent from my SM-G550T1 using Tapatalk