Could the land co-owned by the 4 Rhoden brothers be confiscated if it was proven drugs were grown on it?
Good question. Here's a link about civil asset forfeiture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States
For MJ, it looks like local or state LE have to cooperate with the DEA or other federal LE to do civil asset forfeiture? From all outside appearances, the DEA has not been involved in investigating these murders.
Any ideas of what might be going on with this? If LE isn't working with federal agencies on this case, it might be more difficult.
Also note: No criminal charges have ever been brought WRT any MJ grow ops at the properites. Assume criminal charges haven't been brought because everyone is dead, though there doesn't seem to be any arrests of any people who might have been involved in helping the R's sell MJ.
Attorney General Mike DeWine has also told the Cincinnati Enquirer that the FBI, U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. Department of Homeland Security have worked with the Ohio Bureau of Criminal Investigation and other agencies on what's become a months long investigation. (1)
Dan Tierney, a spokesman for that office, said Tuesday it is too early to discuss the future of the Rhoden land or property. "We have released the scenes. It will be up to the probate process,'' he said.
Christopher Rhoden Sr. solely owned more than eight acres as well as the three trailers, according to Pike and Scioto county court records. He was also the majority owner of another 66 acres in Pike County with his brothers. At least 45 acres of that land was inherited from his father in 2011, according to court records.
Who may inherit the parcels hinges on many unknowns to be determined both by federal and state law and judges, McKay said.(2)
Attorney General Mike DeWine has said that evidence of three marijuana grow sites were found at two of the scenes. There was also evidence of cockfighting. That could mean the government could go to court to take the land through a process known as forfeiture. The government can legally move to take any property proven to be used in a crime or been paid for with money made in criminal activity.
Tierney said Tuesday it was premature to discuss if the state of Ohio would start or even consider forfeiture proceedings: "Our focus is on the investigation, gathering the evidence necessary to identify a suspect or suspects in the case," he said. (2)
Earlier this month, Ohio Governor John Kasich signed into law a bill that requires a criminal conviction before law enforcement can permanently deprive someone of personal property in a civil forfeiture state. This law makes Ohio one of only 11 states with protection in place for personal property when an individual is accused of a crime. (3)
This was August, 2016, and according to the AG, the gang was all there:
This is interesting too, although, we have learned, that vehicles have been returned.
Good on Kasich, here. 1/1/2017:
(1) http://www.wsaz.com/content/news/Community-still-on-edge-three-months-after-murders-387985392.html
(2) https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...en-children-property-still-resolved/84844856/
(3) http://columbusdefenselawyer.attorn...sses-bill-protect-citizens-civil-forfeitures/
Thanks, rsd1200. I knew Ohio had passed a law about civil forfeitures sometime in the recent past. I'm under the weather with the flu this morning and couldn't find it. IIRC, it was passed because of complaints from citizens opposed to the government seizing their guns. Technically, LE could seize the property if they arrested someone who was working with the R family before they were killed, but that's probably not a priority for them right now.
Under state and federal law, police departments can seize and keep property that is suspected of involvement in criminal activity. Unlike criminal asset forfeiture, however, with civil forfeiture, a property owner need not be found guilty of a crime—or even charged—to permanently lose her cash, car, home, or other property. And according to a new report published by the Institute for Justice, “Policing for Profit: The Abuse of Civil Asset Forfeiture,” most state laws are written in such a way as to encourage police agents to pursue profit instead of seeking the neutral administration of justice.
Thanks, rsd1200.
<snip>
I'm under the weather with the flu :flu: this morning and couldn't find it.
<ship>
Good question. Here's a link about civil asset forfeiture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States
For MJ, it looks like local or state LE have to cooperate with the DEA or other federal LE to do civil asset forfeiture? From all outside appearances, the DEA has not been involved in investigating these murders.
Any ideas of what might be going on with this? If LE isn't working with federal agencies on this case, it might be more difficult.
Also note: No criminal charges have ever been brought WRT any MJ grow ops at the properites. Assume criminal charges haven't been brought because everyone is dead, though there doesn't seem to be any arrests of any people who might have been involved in helping the R's sell MJ.
This was August, 2016, and according to the AG, the gang was all there:
This is interesting too, although, we have learned, that vehicles have been returned.
Good on Kasich, here. 1/1/2017:
(1) http://www.wsaz.com/content/news/Community-still-on-edge-three-months-after-murders-387985392.html
(2) https://www.cincinnati.com/story/ne...en-children-property-still-resolved/84844856/
(3) http://columbusdefenselawyer.attorn...sses-bill-protect-citizens-civil-forfeitures/
But this is yet another screwy thing about this case. There's drugs on the land and used for sale making it criminal enough not to pay for their funerals. But there isn't enough to confiscate the land from the surviving brothers? The land has been appraised and put into Brady's name according to probate and ohio auditors site, but I didn't see TR's name on any of the parcels. I guess that's the en tel thing again. I'm confused.
Then the night comes. And it changes everything. She just lies there, restless.
“Wondering, wondering, wondering. Wondering why was this done, why they took out eight lives like that,” the 73-year-old matriarch of the Rhoden family said. “You can’t shut it off. It’s always in my heart and my mind how they all got shot like that.”
She can’t say anymore. Not right yet. She sobs into the neatly-folded flowered handkerchief clenched in her trembling hand.
Investigators found marijuana growing in three locations (including an indoor operation in an old garage next to Chris Sr.’s trailer) at two of the crime scenes but have not said what, if any, connection the marijuana might have had to the killings. Authorities have offered no motive, identified no suspects and made no arrests.
“The longer it goes on with no answers, the more the family is breaking,” Michelle Rhoden said. She was married for 11 years to Brady Rhoden, another of Geneva’s sons, and they have two sons together. But once you’re in this family, you’re in. Divorce generally changes little but an address.
“You can’t stop thinking about it,” said Michelle, crying. “You’re scared half to death yourself. Nobody sleeps. Nothing is the same. I don’t feel like we’ll ever get past it.”
The surviving relatives feel as if they are under an unfair microscope, she said, constantly asked to provide investigators with answers and information but given none in return.
answered my own question seems the whole family including his daughter have gone
Justice for Rhoden/Gilley on FB asked people to stay home and light a candle.
The problem is that the land in question is jointly owned by the Rhoden brothers, two of whom were not involved in the MJ grow op. It would be unfair to confiscate their property when they had broken no laws. Seems unlikely the two surviving Rhoden brothers were involved in the MJ operation or they would have been killed as well.
But this is yet another screwy thing about this case. There's drugs on the land and used for sale making it criminal enough not to pay for their funerals. But there isn't enough to confiscate the land from the surviving brothers? The land has been appraised and put into Brady's name according to probate and ohio auditors site, but I didn't see TR's name on any of the parcels. I guess that's the en tel thing again. I'm confused.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.