My take on LM's custody mention is that perhaps he's not talking about custody of children. I take him to be something of a loose cannon--and probably for that reason not privy to inner circle knowledge--although I think his statement that he didn't know about the grow ops is just knee-jerk protwctive denial. But recall that his first statement contained some overt threats directed at LE aimed at getting his son's truck released. I think it makes more sense that he was talking about custody of evidence. IOW a suggestion that LE was profitting from property seizures. I do think that is a far better explanation.