Not often in cases the family tries to undercut LE leads. I think he should probably just let them do their job JMO
Seriously! I agree/was thinking the same thing. This quote from BIL, or possibly the way in which the journalist edited his quote (?), is really unhelpful. I’m trying to figure out WHY a family member of a murder victim would react to Police’s video of a POI by saying, “It could just be a drunk person walking home from a bar.” Why? What purpose would it serve, to cast doubt like that? Why would they not reiterate to the public, something like, “Police think the person in the video had something to do with our family members’ murders, or has important information. If you recognize him, please call the Police and report what you know.”
Is it mistrust in the Police’s work? Was BIL just speaking off-the-cuff, and the journalist unfortunately worded the quote that way? Does BIL have his own strong thoughts about who the murderer is, which conflict with what he sees in the video? I have so many questions.
I’m also thinking, the Police don’t always tell the public the truth. They’re strategic about what they say or show to the public, and how much, and when, and about what they choose to hold back from the public. These are legitimate strategies, used to protect the integrity of the investigation, protect victims or survivors or family members, misdirect the suspect, or tighten the parameters of the tips the public reports. Some people might misinterpret LE’s strategic, careful releasing and withholding of information, and misdirection, as LE being “shady” and “lying” to the public… but it’s not like that. It’s a normal, necessary part of LE’s work.
A family member who’s unfamiliar with LE tactics like this would be more likely to talk with a journalist and cast doubt on what LE has released, if said family member doesn’t understand or doesn’t agree with what LE is saying. But I wouldn’t expect a family member who works in journalism himself to publicly cast doubt on what LE are saying…
….unless that family member’s comments, too, are an intentional strategy/misdirection to somehow BACK UP the Police?? Sometimes LE will give family members more information about their investigation and strategy than they give to the general public, of course, and they will enlist the family member(s) to help by saying or not saying certain things when they do media.
Am I maybe going down a rabbit hole too much? Do I watch too many crime shows? I could be way off base. I’d love to hear others’ thoughts on why in the world BIL would have gone on record to doubt/question LE’s investigation. How could that actually help?