- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Messages
- 141
- Reaction score
- 1,072
I thought if he left the car somewhere, then he got to his destination and returned the same way. Then there should be a video of him coming.
Yeah, the study linked disproves that race can be determined by gait, not the opposite.
"No significant interactions between race and sex were identified. Males took longer steps (regular: p < 0.001, ƞp2 = 0.288, fast: p < 0.001, ƞp2 = 0.193) and had larger peak knee flexion (regular: p = 0.007, ƞp2 = 0.081, fast: p < 0.001, ƞp2 = 0.188) and ankle plantarflexion angles (regular: p = 0.050, ƞp2 = 0.044, fast: p = 0.049, ƞp2 = 0.044). Peak ankle plantarflexion angle (regular: p = 0.012, ƞp2 = 0.071, fast: p < 0.001, ƞp2 = 0.137) and peak hip extension angle during fast walking (p = 0.007, ƞp2 = 0.083) were smaller in AA. Equivalency in gait measures between racial groups should not be assumed. Racially diverse study samples should be prioritized in the development of future research and individualized treatment protocols."
This study does provide some data to back up the video showing a male, but nothing to indicate race. The idea that race can be identified by gait is in line with phrenology. JMO
Do you have a link to the video?While I think the BIL behavior is weird and attention seeking, I don't believe it's him. He would have to have a lot of balls to accept this many interviews and be so chatty about the case. Should he share details about the kid and the dog? Of course not. But maybe he is just overwhelmed.
I can't get over the 3rd friend dropping flowers in the ABC 6 video... similar boots... similar walk.... similar frame... anyone else noticing this?
If the adult-in-charge agrees to questioning of the minors. When needed, Temporary Guardianship can often be established in a day or two.Typically they do what's called a "forensic interview," conducted by a trained child expert. So it wouldn't be the police asking that older child questions, although they'd typically be watching from outside the room.
I would assume patients were starting to arrive, so it's not just a co-worker not at their desk, but patients expecting dental care. That makes it important for the clinic to know what is happening, and to be alarmed early.Maybe it's been discussed here already, but it seems interesting to me that someone would want to call 911 so early when their colleague is a no show? Only an opinion- nothing more.
![]()
Brother-in-Law Remembers Dentist and Wife Found Shot to Death Inside Their Home: ‘Never Saw Them Without a Smile’
Spencer Tepe and his wife, Monique Tepe, were found fatally shot at their home in Columbus, Ohio, on Tuesday, Dec. 30. Rob Misleh, Monique's brother, said in a statement on behalf of the family that the couple were 'warm' people who 'lived for their children.'people.com
Not merely a colleague, but a person who almost certainly was scheduled to see patients that day (office opens at 8am).Maybe it's been discussed here already, but it seems interesting to me that someone would want to call 911 so early when their colleague is a no show? Only an opinion- nothing more.
![]()
Brother-in-Law Remembers Dentist and Wife Found Shot to Death Inside Their Home: ‘Never Saw Them Without a Smile’
Spencer Tepe and his wife, Monique Tepe, were found fatally shot at their home in Columbus, Ohio, on Tuesday, Dec. 30. Rob Misleh, Monique's brother, said in a statement on behalf of the family that the couple were 'warm' people who 'lived for their children.'people.com
It's been discussed like a million times and everyone in medicine says it's not weirdMaybe it's been discussed here already, but it seems interesting to me that someone would want to call 911 so early when their colleague is a no show? Only an opinion- nothing more.
![]()
Brother-in-Law Remembers Dentist and Wife Found Shot to Death Inside Their Home: ‘Never Saw Them Without a Smile’
Spencer Tepe and his wife, Monique Tepe, were found fatally shot at their home in Columbus, Ohio, on Tuesday, Dec. 30. Rob Misleh, Monique's brother, said in a statement on behalf of the family that the couple were 'warm' people who 'lived for their children.'people.com
The BIL said that Police hadn’t really spoken to him yet - maybe they’re content watching him do all the talking in public at this point for reasons only known to themAt this time, I'd imagine that LE have cleared people close or who have any connection (as far as close friends/relatives) to them, & checked alibi's ?
It'd be nice to hear it from LE, though.
So that would leave a random attack (doubtful imo !) , a disgruntled coworker, or a hired hit by someone who felt 'wronged' in some way ?
The, 'no forced entry' statement by LE is interesting because it seems like they're hinting this was an inside job ?
Someone who knew them, however fleetingly.
May justice be swift and harsh for Spencer and Monique.
Omo.
Thr brothers in law was talking a bit too much and his previoys reddit comments on unrelated things have all been wiped from his profile.Seriously! I agree/was thinking the same thing. This quote from BIL, or possibly the way in which the journalist edited his quote (?), is really unhelpful. I’m trying to figure out WHY a family member of a murder victim would react to Police’s video of a POI by saying, “It could just be a drunk person walking home from a bar.” Why? What purpose would it serve, to cast doubt like that? Why would they not reiterate to the public, something like, “Police think the person in the video had something to do with our family members’ murders, or has important information. If you recognize him, please call the Police and report what you know.”
Is it mistrust in the Police’s work? Was BIL just speaking off-the-cuff, and the journalist unfortunately worded the quote that way? Does BIL have his own strong thoughts about who the murderer is, which conflict with what he sees in the video? I have so many questions.
I’m also thinking, the Police don’t always tell the public the truth. They’re strategic about what they say or show to the public, and how much, and when, and about what they choose to hold back from the public. These are legitimate strategies, used to protect the integrity of the investigation, protect victims or survivors or family members, misdirect the suspect, or tighten the parameters of the tips the public reports. Some people might misinterpret LE’s strategic, careful releasing and withholding of information, and misdirection, as LE being “shady” and “lying” to the public… but it’s not like that. It’s a normal, necessary part of LE’s work.
A family member who’s unfamiliar with LE tactics like this would be more likely to talk with a journalist and cast doubt on what LE has released, if said family member doesn’t understand or doesn’t agree with what LE is saying. But I wouldn’t expect a family member who works in journalism himself to publicly cast doubt on what LE are saying…
….unless that family member’s comments, too, are an intentional strategy/misdirection to somehow BACK UP the Police?? Sometimes LE will give family members more information about their investigation and strategy than they give to the general public, of course, and they will enlist the family member(s) to help by saying or not saying certain things when they do media.
Am I maybe going down a rabbit hole too much? Do I watch too many crime shows? I could be way off base. I’d love to hear others’ thoughts on why in the world BIL would have gone on record to doubt/question LE’s investigation. How could that actually help?
Got to look for that.[Mod edit. Person is not a POI]
I can't get over the 3rd friend dropping flowers in the ABC 6 video... similar boots... similar walk.... similar frame... anyone else noticing this?
When you think about this logically it’s actually slightly weird - not the concern. But how fast they made it to the house to do a welfare check when they had already called police - given the distance of the work location and the homeIt's been discussed like a million times and everyone in medicine says it's not weird
Just out of interest as my awareness of guns is zilch apart from you shoot from themRegarding the Gunshots Inside the Home
-OH is a suppressor friendly state. NFA tax stamp is available for ownership, use, and hunting.
An targeted killer would not likely use an NFA registered suppressor.
-It is confirmed that three (3) 9mm casings were found on the crime scene.
-Shooting with a suppressor does create a decent amount of sound, though little enough to the point most shooter don't require ear protection. I like shooting 9mm for practice because it is quieter and has less recoil (and is cheaper) than larger or rifle rounds but indoors it will still create considerable reports.
-One neighbor interviewed (I posted upthread) that he "didn't hear anything that night" but "hears gunshots all the time."
-3 consecutive shots of 9mm, even non-suppressed indoors could likely slide by in a city environment near New Years at night.
Fireworks, trucks-backfiring, dumpsters slamming and other things can be rationalized in the middle of the night. When I lived in the city I got desensitized to all that. Now in the winter I wake up to shotgun report for waterfowl hunting along the river down the street, and my wooded quasi-suburban neighborhood is dead quiet at 5 am. So that's a contextual thing,
-Kids can sleep through a lot. We don't know if they did.
-The verbiage police uses to the press often has a tolerance built in. Nothing is definitive purposefully. Sometimes an investigation proves one point otherwise. Right not they "don't believe" it is this or that. There does not "appear" to be signs of a robbery. We don't know. They do know a lot more.
-The crime scene will tell a lot about the shooting and help recreate how it went down. Forensics, blood spatter, gun shot residue, angle of entry/exit wounds, distance and location of spent casings, etc. etc. They already know most of that.
My thoughts exactly.Brother in law is acting bizarre from day 1, why are the police letting him talk so much? Strategic?
Primarily semi-automatic handguns. But, there are some long guns chambered in 9mm.Just out of interest as my awareness of guns is zilch apart from you shoot from them
What guns shoot 9mm bullets
If it were just a drunk person walking home, the cameras will show that, there are so many around. However, if the cameras show him on the property, going in the property, we have a different story. It was 23F out that night, he couldn't have been walking far in those clothes.Seriously! I agree/was thinking the same thing. This quote from BIL, or possibly the way in which the journalist edited his quote (?), is really unhelpful. I’m trying to figure out WHY a family member of a murder victim would react to Police’s video of a POI by saying, “It could just be a drunk person walking home from a bar.” Why? What purpose would it serve, to cast doubt like that? Why would they not reiterate to the public, something like, “Police think the person in the video had something to do with our family members’ murders, or has important information. If you recognize him, please call the Police and report what you know.”
Is it mistrust in the Police’s work? Was BIL just speaking off-the-cuff, and the journalist unfortunately worded the quote that way? Does BIL have his own strong thoughts about who the murderer is, which conflict with what he sees in the video? I have so many questions.
I’m also thinking, the Police don’t always tell the public the truth. They’re strategic about what they say or show to the public, and how much, and when, and about what they choose to hold back from the public. These are legitimate strategies, used to protect the integrity of the investigation, protect victims or survivors or family members, misdirect the suspect, or tighten the parameters of the tips the public reports. Some people might misinterpret LE’s strategic, careful releasing and withholding of information, and misdirection, as LE being “shady” and “lying” to the public… but it’s not like that. It’s a normal, necessary part of LE’s work.
A family member who’s unfamiliar with LE tactics like this would be more likely to talk with a journalist and cast doubt on what LE has released, if said family member doesn’t understand or doesn’t agree with what LE is saying. But I wouldn’t expect a family member who works in journalism himself to publicly cast doubt on what LE are saying…
….unless that family member’s comments, too, are an intentional strategy/misdirection to somehow BACK UP the Police?? Sometimes LE will give family members more information about their investigation and strategy than they give to the general public, of course, and they will enlist the family member(s) to help by saying or not saying certain things when they do media.
Am I maybe going down a rabbit hole too much? Do I watch too many crime shows? I could be way off base. I’d love to hear others’ thoughts on why in the world BIL would have gone on record to doubt/question LE’s investigation. How could that actually help?
Maybe a family member had a talk with him about it and said to dial it back.Thr brothers in law was talking a bit too much and his previoys reddit comments on unrelated things have all been wiped from his profile.