GUILTY OK - Jaymie Adams, 25, Blanchard, 9 Dec 2011

  • #581
For some reason I am really skeptical of her claims of abuse. Most women who are abused need to be told where/how to get help, this is a woman who (apparently) knew how to work the system... That said, who really knows?

I am not skeptical of her claims of abuse at all. Apparently her husband killed her and her unborn child and then tried very hard to cover his tracks so that he would never have to answer for what he did. If anything, that makes her claims of prior abuse more believable to me.
 
  • #582
Sure it could. That situation could just as easily point to her "just wanting to teach him a lesson, or scare him."



I'm confused... I always thought a "complaint" meant "charged."

The "complaint" is what's included in the arresting documentation. Then, they have a certain amount of time (in some states 24 hours, some states 72 hours, I think California is 10 days) before they have to officially charge the suspect or release him from jail.

At the time the suspect is formally charged, protections go into place. At that time, the attorney has the right to the evidence, and the suspect has the right to demand a speedy trial and other protections.

I don't know why he hasn't been charged yet, it's now been 7 days.

I certainly have a guess why he hasn't been charged - but it's only based on a gut feeling.
 
  • #583
http://s3.amazonaws.com/content.newsok.com/documents/j27adams.pdf
(warrant^ just to confirm middle name as here is his case number:)

http://www.oscn.net/applications/os...=caseGeneral&casemasterID=2826708&db=Oklahoma

MI-2012-45 (case number)

above link should take you to his docket. It not, you can enter his name into the search court dockets link

the following is a good link to the felony process in Oklahoma:
http://www.oklahomacriminallaw.com/state_felony_process.htm

I have yet to find out if there is a time limit in Oklahoma for formal charges to be filed...
 
  • #584
  • #585
thanks for the link JeannaT

The article also says she has never been part of a murder investigation fwiw
 
  • #586
Oh, well, sure, Nurse. I would think a private investigator would typically be involved with cheating spouses, business partners who are suspected of being shady, and then there's her credible past of working as an insurance claim investigator as well as a PI.

I realize this is different from a homicide investigator, but I think someone trained with her experience is dedicated to getting to the truth, and knows how to do it. Rather than, say, quickly deciding what happened and then following up to document that what they think happened, did indeed happen. I'm just going to say I'm prejudiced into believing that's what LE does. Typically they come up with a very quick analysis of who is guilty, and then the backfill to find evidence that they are right.

I will acknowledge that this usually pans out because they are usually (as in, most often, more than 50% of the time) right.

A bit of a different topic, but I have USAA insurance and I have been amazed at what information USAA private employees can turn up that LE can't seem to locate after a car wreck I would back their investigators against any COP, as far as being able to turn up information AND being willing to share it with me. Maybe not all insurance investigators are tip of the top like USAA, but I'm backing this breath of fresh air in the Jaymie Adams case.
 
  • #587
If Jaymie says her husband was abusive to her, then I am going to believe her. Yes, there are some people that will lie about it, but she's gone and he's accused of killing her, so it makes her claims even more real to me.

As for the private investigator.....just because she is one doesn't mean she's a good one. I'll wait on my opinion of her until later.

MOO
 
  • #588
  • #589
http://www.koco.com/r-video/30392368/detail.html

yesterday the DA filed an extension as new information has come up on Justin Adams that needs time to be investigated to determine any additional charges in the case. They have until next Monday to file charges (video)

http://www.oscn.net/applications/os...=caseGeneral&casemasterID=2826708&db=Oklahoma
^^docket reflects this^^

Hmmm. Interesting. I wonder what the new information is? A tip from someone? And I wonder what the additional charges would be?
Just thinking out loud.
 
  • #590
Hmmm. Interesting. I wonder what the new information is? A tip from someone? And I wonder what the additional charges would be?
Just thinking out loud.

So great that there's a deadline. I was also interested in the fact that the supporting court document is available at the clerk's office - hopefully it will be published soon.
 
  • #591
So great that there's a deadline. I was also interested in the fact that the supporting court document is available at the clerk's office - hopefully it will be published soon.

JeannaT, if it is published could you let us know? I would really be interested in seeing it. TIA
 
  • #592
On Monday, prosecutors asked for a 10-day extension.
They say there is new information in the case that requires more investigation.
Police have said Justin Adams failed a lie detector test.
They also said Justin and Jaymie Adams had a stormy relationship.


Read more: http://www.koco.com/news/30397146/detail.html#ixzz1lhyIInuJ


the defense atty also spun a lot in the above link
 
  • #593
  • #594
  • #595
no problem MM :-) at this point, according to the docket, the documents are only available directly from the CoC (not online)
 
  • #596
So it appears the prosecutor is waiting until the last possible legal minute to charge Justin Adams. Monday is the last day he can charge Justin. Does anyone know, is there a time of day on Monday when he has to press charges, or is it at the end of the business day? Or midnight?

I'm on the side of Justin's lawyer in realizing this delay is because they don't have hard evidence. Of course, I could be wrong.
 
  • #597
Does anyone know, does the clock for when a trial must start begin with an arrest or with being formally charged? Maybe they wanted to buy a few extra weeks, if it is from charging date? Not sure what the parameters are in Ohio, I know some states it is as short as six months before the case must go to trial, unless defense requests the delay.
 
  • #598
I believe it begins with being formally charged, cluciano. I think the defendant actually has to invoke their right to a speedy trial for that right to go into affect - if not, the court sets the docket as is convenient.

At this point, Justin's lawyer hasn't been able to see what LE has as evidence, since he hasn't been charged. I don't know when Justin will have to invoke his right to a speedy trial - if that comes with the original charging hearing, when the lawyer basically has no information, and no way to make an informed decision about whether to go for a speedy trial? It would be good to have a trial lawyer here from Oklahoma to weigh in.
 
  • #599
BTW, I meant to say Oklahoma, not Ohio, in my post...
 
  • #600

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
141
Guests online
1,045
Total visitors
1,186

Forum statistics

Threads
632,404
Messages
18,626,018
Members
243,140
Latest member
raezofsunshine83
Back
Top