GUILTY OK - Patrick Misner for raping 4yo girl, Sapulpa, 2012

  • #381
  • #382
  • #383
I hope that this creep spends the rest of his life in prison. Not only did he rape a four-year-old girl, and stab the family dog to death, and stage a break in by breaking a window - but he expected to get away with it. Evil, pure evil.
 
  • #384
I've been thinking about this angel and I hope she is doing better.
 
  • #385
I will start by saying I worked with Tommy for 6+ months.
There is NO way he did what they are saying he did. He loves her like she is his! No doubt in my mind he will be cleared of all charges.
 
  • #386
I believe that this male is guilty of sexual assault upon a small helpless child. There is a difference between adult love and perverted lust. He did not love that little girl. He raped her. There is a difference between a grown woman and a four-year-old little girl. A big difference.

IMHO
 
  • #387
:ohwow: :ohwow:


Oklahoma Court Docket shows a hearing is scheduled for Tommy Braden on Wed, June 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. This hearing could possibly be to set a trial date as the docket shows arraignment and a plea of not guilty took place on 4/24/2012.

Snippet from court docket:

04/24/2012

CM:LH:NO CSR; 4-24-12 I.A.: LAURA FARRIS APPEARS FOR THE STATE; DEFENDANT APPEARS, IN CUSTODY, WITH LOWELL HOWE. ADVISED OF RIGHTS; ARRAIGNED; NOT GUILTY PLEA. CONFERENCE SET 5-23-12 AT 1:30 PM. REMANDED TO CUSTODY AND RECOGNIZED BACK.

05/23/2012

CM:LH:NO CSR, 5-23-12, CONFERENCE, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY. PASSED ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION BY AGREEMENT TO 6-20-12 AT 1:30 P.M. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY.



Calendar events

Date
Time
Description



04/24/2012
9:00am
LH: HEARING Completed : 04/24/2012 Code: X


05/23/2012
1:30pm
LH: HEARING Completed : 05/24/2012 Code: X


06/20/2012
1:30pm
LH: HEARING
 
  • #388
:ohwow: :ohwow:
Oklahoma Court Docket shows a hearing is scheduled for Tommy Braden on Wed, June 20, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. This hearing could possibly be to set a trial date as the docket shows arraignment and a plea of not guilty took place on 4/24/2012.


Overnight updates to OK court records do not indicate that a hearing was held yesterday for Tommy Braden.


Link for Oklahoma On-Demand Court Records

http://www1.odcr.com/
 
  • #389
]:wave:


NEWS UPDATE ON TOMMY BRADEN


http://www.sapulpaheraldonline.com/articles/2012/06/21/news/doc4fe35855c54f1402030257.txt

COURT AWAITS DNA RESULTS

Thursday, June 21, 2012 3:04 PM CDT

Wednesday afternoon, a Muskogee man accused of felony child sexual abuse was allowed a continuance in his case in Creek County District Court to allow for DNA testing results to be returned from the state forensics lab in Edmond.

Tommy Lee Braden, 24, plead not guilty following his April 10 arrest on complaints he allegedly abused a 4-year-old Creek County girl on April 6.

“The case has some issues related to DNA testing,” Assistant District Attorney Laura Farris said to the court. “It would best serve the court and justice for the victim to wait for the DNA test results.”
Farris told the court she made several calls to the state lab with no success.

State officials said it usually takes about 60 days for DNA testing to be completed and staff to submit their reports.

Henderson and the attorneys rescheduled the next hearing for the afternoon of Wednesday, July 18.

Also joining him at his court appearance were several friends and family members. He nodded to them as they waved and wished him well as they left the court room Thursday.
<snipped by me>

More in Link
 
  • #390
How often do they wait for the DNA results if they've already made an arrest?
They generally make an arrest based on evidence and the DNA is a bonus.
Hmmm..... what if the DNA doesn't match?
 
  • #391
If they do not have a DNA match, then I am going to withhold my judgment. He may not be the guilty party. I still think it is so strange the way it went down. Some things do not add up.

If he was the perp, he had it made. He could have continued to groom her and abuse her for quite awhile. Why the sudden killing and ending of his situation? It seems so odd, imo.
 
  • #392
It does not take that long to get DNA back. In a case such as this it should have been expedited. If there has been issues with the DNA results I believe this case is not a slam dunk.
 
  • #393
The family has said for a while that the DNA didn't match or was not done yet.
That is why I have not come to a conclusion yet.

Riley Fox's father was the convenient suspect... but not guilty.
He was arrested and held until DNA proved his innocence. This case reminds me a lot of that.

And how often do this many friends and family defend a guy in this situation? Murder sure, but child rape?
 
  • #394

Wow, the DNA info is definitely weird. It may be standard to wait 60 days for DNA but I would think in a case like this, especially since they've arrested someone, that they would have rushed it through the system. It sounds to me like there was some sort of problem either with the match or the sample itself and they are retesting maybe?

Whatever it is, I hope they didn't jump to conclusions and arrest this guy without some kind of solid evidence.
 
  • #395
:wave: Updated Court Records


Wow, the DNA info is definitely weird. It may be standard to wait 60 days for DNA but I would think in a case like this, especially since they've arrested someone, that they would have rushed it through the system. It sounds to me like there was some sort of problem either with the match or the sample itself and they are retesting maybe?

Whatever it is, I hope they didn't jump to conclusions and arrest this guy without some kind of solid evidence.


I also hope they didn't prematurely arrest Braden ... It just doesn't seem the D.A.'s office would make that kind of mistake. And, to add to the confusion, read what the court docket shows after updating last night!!

Link for Oklahoma On-Demand Court Records

http://www1.odcr.com/

CASE ENTRIES :what:

06/22/2012

CM:LH:NO CSR, 6-20-12, CONFERENCE, DEFENDANT APPEARS IN CUSTODY WITH COUNSEL LOWELL G. HOWE. WAITING FOR DRUG AND ALCOHOL RESULTS.CONTINUED BY AGREEMENT FOR CONFERENCE TO 7-18-12 AT 1:30 P.M. DEFENDANT REMANDED TO CUSTODY AND RECOGNIZED BACK


CALENDAR EVENTS

Date
Time
Description


04/24/2012
9:00am
LH: HEARING Completed : 04/24/2012 Code: X

05/23/2012
1:30pm
LH: HEARING Completed : 05/24/2012 Code: X

06/20/2012
1:30pm
LH: HEARING Completed : 06/22/2012 Code: X

07/18/2012
1:30pm
LH: HEARING

BBM
 
  • #396
:wave: Updated Court Records





I also hope they didn't prematurely arrest Braden ... It just doesn't seem the D.A.'s office would make that kind of mistake. And, to add to the confusion, read what the court docket shows after updating last night!!

Link for Oklahoma On-Demand Court Records

http://www1.odcr.com/



BBM

Hmmm...Southernnana, do you take that to mean they are waiting for Braden's drug and alcohol tests or maybe tests from the victim?
I don't think I've seen that before. Blood alcohol levels can be checked very quickly, toxicology would probably take longer but 2 months? In a case like this? What is with all of these delays?
 
  • #397
:dunno:


Hmmm...Southernnana, do you take that to mean they are waiting for Braden's drug and alcohol tests or maybe tests from the victim?
I don't think I've seen that before. Blood alcohol levels can be checked very quickly, toxicology would probably take longer but 2 months? In a case like this? What is with all of these delays?


I was puzzled by the drug and alcohol tests remarks also, especially after just reading the news article concerning still waiting on DNA ??

That was also my opinion ... alcohol test results quickly ... drug results IDK, maybe the lab is just backed up because of so much crime involving drug tests. As you suggested, it could be testing for the little girl.
Or, maybe an error on someone's part.

Any thoughts from others ?
 
  • #398
Is it possible that somehow the first sample or test was contaminated and had to be retested? Drug and alcohol really shouldn't take that long....

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2
 
  • #399
Is it possible that somehow the first sample or test was contaminated and had to be retested? Drug and alcohol really shouldn't take that long....

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk 2

Probably, a test could have been contaminated. There was such mass confusion and blood in so many places ... it would not surprise me what had to be redone ... can you just imagine being LE or paramedics and finding that child in the condition she was in. How could they even think straight!!

I read the article again to see if I missed anything ... didn't see anything except just thinking the generic term "DNA testing results" could include all kinds or types of evidence that we don't have a clue about. :cow:

http://www.sapulpaheraldonline.com/articles/2012/06/21/news/doc4fe35855c54f1402030257.txt

Court awaits DNA results

Wednesday afternoon, a Muskogee man accused of felony child sexual abuse was allowed a continuance in his case in Creek County District Court to allow for DNA&#8200;testing results to be returned from the state forensics lab in Edmond.

“The case has some issues related to DNA&#8200;testing,”&#8200;Assistant District Attorney Laura Farris said to the court. “It would best serve the court and justice for the victim to wait for the DNA&#8200;test results.”Farris told the court she made several calls to the state lab with no success.
 
  • #400
Issues with DNA testing? They have this guy sitting in jail under arrest.
I am not just going to assume this guy is guilty because I haven't seen any evidence as of yet that it's in fact so.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
129
Guests online
3,456
Total visitors
3,585

Forum statistics

Threads
632,633
Messages
18,629,486
Members
243,231
Latest member
Irena21D
Back
Top