So, do police have any physical evidence against this guy? What DNA did they get of the 4 year old?
Bless Her Heart. :heartbeat::rose::heartbeat:
I hope that his arrest and conviction will help her heal and feel more in control of her life. This is going to be such a devastating tragedy for her to overcome.
My prayers go out to her each and every night.
I feel certain they have evidence. They know that the 4 year old won't be able to testify against him in court. The lie detector test can't be discussed in court. They had no basis to arrest unless they had something else, probably something circumstantial. Examples....Could have been blood in the drains, someone who heard the screams, a witness who saw lights go on after the mother left, blood in the man's bedroom, blood under his nails or something that substaniates what the inadmissible evidence says.
Since rape is often more about anger and frustration than it is about sex I wondered if perhaps the parents had been arguing either the night before or that morning. Esp. since this appeared to be such a violent rape. For him a way of venting his anger and to get back at the mother.
How does someone just wake one day and viciously rape a child they have cared for? This had to be in his mind...I can't imagine just waking up thinking, okay, today's the day to rape my stepdaughter???? How in the world does that happen???
Was there any suspicions? Did he show any outward red flags?
I just will never understand...:banghead:
poor baby girl :hug:
I wish very much to see what he's charged with and what the evidence is....first report set my hinky meter going but I read here a great deal I KNOW shouldnt let that influence me (as in to always assume it was boyfriend/stepdad...because I cant asume "always" about anything)
the arrest didnt surprise me but the other details make it seem like it doesnt fit at all.
I (hope?) they have DNA etc because otherwise I fear that LE may have fallen victim to the same thing as I do...too much knowledge of ugly...and make immediate assumptions that may not pan out.
Tommy Braden is expected to go in front of a judge Wednesday morning. Deputies say the maximum sentence for this crime is life in prison.
Here is why this is bothering me...
Yes, we see the Peterson and Anthony type families who defend relentlessly...
However, child rape cases are completely different than spousal murders, serial killers, raping an adult, or robbing a bank.
When was the last time we had a case with the following criteria:
Brutal sexual assault of a child younger than 5.
Child is very seriously injured, requiring surgery or worse.
Then a suspect is arrested and it's the "typical" boyfriend/stepfather suspect.
Immediately there are friends, family, neighbors, babysitter, coworkers... out there defending the man.
Often using their real names to defend the man arrested for raping and nearly killing a preschooler.
There really hasn't been anybody talking bad about him. Just a few people willing to consider the possibility of his guilt.
When else has that happened?
I can think of one time... and it was ONLY family defending him and they have backed off less than a month later.
http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=165360&highlight=defending
I can think of many where nobody defended them. This case seems different in the way people are defending him.
I find it intriguing. After cases like Brooke's, I am more than willing to wait and see what the evidence is.
Every once in a while that obvious suspect isn't guilty.
Sometimes that crazy family insisting they are innocent... is actually right. :twocents:
:what:
Rumor read but source not verified at this time is that a trailer park resident saw a bloody dead dachshund on the porch that had been gutted. Hopefully, if I can find the source again, there will be a link to additional remarks.
This link has the news video where the trailer park resident describes seeing the dead dachshund on the porch ... it is at the end of the video.
http://www.fox23.com/news/local/sto...Creek-County-girl/KaFX5llZF061YosqTSugiQ.cspx
One more item to add to the confusion. I suspect this resident had useful information for LE to use concerning the time frame when she saw the dog. However, it is not included in the video. Also, is this the same dead dog that had been left behind a neighboring trailer park?
Just questioning ......No formal charges yet? No confirmation of DNA match yet? Or, does LE not pubically announce there is a DNA match for the suspect? Is it just held as trial evidence? I really can't recall.
:frown:
I don't know if they have to announce a DNA match, but formal charges would be public information.
They have not been filed yet.
It seems to me, if they had a DNA match already, they'd have formal charges.
I really hope they haven't ruined this young man's life with an arrest with no evidence whatsoever.
The rumors about their relationship breakup are interesting, and damning.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.