OK OK - Peggy McGuire, 28, Eufaula, 16 Nov 2015

[PokeyMeansBusiness]

One good question, though, and that was how did the father know to pick up his son.

The answer to this question has not been released to the public.

I also didn't know that Peggy and the boy's father were not living together.

They were living together. This has been confirmed on MSM and by the family on the fb group. The interviewer was simply trying to protect the investigation because she knew what Nancy Grace's follow up questions would have been. She would have attacked the obvious. Unfortunately, her statements caused on uproar by all the supporters on the fb group. The supporters, many of whom have donated money to the cause, were frustrated by the interviewee's answers. As you can see from the transcript, most answers were simple 'Good Question' responses or answers that conflict with other MSM reports.

The family is trying to increase the awareness of the case, but at the same time, they are getting extremely upset with the amount of questions being asked. Questions are inevitable with increased awareness, especially for this case. If the family wants to continue to increase this case's awareness and support, they have to be prepared to answer or at least acknowledge some of the tough questions being asked.

The above statements are of my opinion only.

 

[BtgJULIEP]

Heartbreaking case -- we have gone down twice - Thanksgiving & Christmas - have lots of leads and good idea what happened, weather shut us down both trips - wanna go back and check a couple places with our K9 partners - thanks for keeping this one in the news - Betty, Peggys mom is simply numb. Heartbreaking -- julie P

 

[Treelights]

The answer to this question has not been released to the public.



They were living together. This has been confirmed on MSM and by the family on the fb group. The interviewer was simply trying to protect the investigation because she knew what Nancy Grace's follow up questions would have been. She would have attacked the obvious. Unfortunately, her statements caused on uproar by all the supporters on the fb group. The supporters, many of whom have donated money to the cause, were frustrated by the interviewee's answers. As you can see from the transcript, most answers were simple 'Good Question' responses or answers that conflict with other MSM reports.

The family is trying to increase the awareness of the case, but at the same time, they are getting extremely upset with the amount of questions being asked. Questions are inevitable with increased awareness, especially for this case. If the family wants to continue to increase this case's awareness and support, they have to be prepared to answer or at least acknowledge some of the tough questions being asked.

The above statements are of my opinion only.

And unfortunately with this interview and the statements made, or lack of, can give the public a false idea that they did not live together, when they actually did.
I can understand the uproar and I can understand that even though people want Peggy to be found, that people might Not want to get involved because what Truth is out there? When a family member is evasive and it obviously lead a poster up thread to believe they did not live together, then yeah, I can see that people might not want to get involved in helping, (Not that this poster doesn't want to help!, but the general public, I mean), because now it is like, well, why be so evasive? Why make it seem something that it is not? THAT hinders the case, in my opinion.
Yes, I do understand why this person might have been evasive, but maybe others do not, and others may have seen this Nancy Grace episode or read the transcripts and believe at face value that they did not live together purely by how everything was worded and evasiveness.
That is sad to me, because WHY go on Nancy Grace and make the public think something else???
I do hope Peggy is found.
IMOO.

 

[JnRyan]

The answer to this question has not been released to the public.



They were living together. This has been confirmed on MSM and by the family on the fb group. The interviewer was simply trying to protect the investigation because she knew what Nancy Grace's follow up questions would have been. She would have attacked the obvious. Unfortunately, her statements caused on uproar by all the supporters on the fb group. The supporters, many of whom have donated money to the cause, were frustrated by the interviewee's answers. As you can see from the transcript, most answers were simple 'Good Question' responses or answers that conflict with other MSM reports.

The family is trying to increase the awareness of the case, but at the same time, they are getting extremely upset with the amount of questions being asked. Questions are inevitable with increased awareness, especially for this case. If the family wants to continue to increase this case's awareness and support, they have to be prepared to answer or at least acknowledge some of the tough questions being asked.

The above statements are of my opinion only.

Interesting. It seems all Nancy Grace did was muddy the water.

 

[PokeyMeansBusiness]

Interesting. It seems all Nancy Grace did was muddy the water.

That is what she is known for doing. She will ask difficult questions and she will try to bring light to the case. BUT - What is the point if you aren't willing (or unable) to answer the difficult questions?

 

[SeriouslySearching]

The weather may help if she is deceased as it will help preserve the body.

Pigs. Ugh. I don't even want to think about that aspect.

After she went missing, the weather remained way above average temps. I don't think there would be much to preserve.

 

[sloane7777]

I know.. the pig thing, it is sad to imagine...

and used oh so often .......

 

[SeriouslySearching]

The answer to this question has not been released to the public.



They were living together. This has been confirmed on MSM and by the family on the fb group. The interviewer was simply trying to protect the investigation because she knew what Nancy Grace's follow up questions would have been. She would have attacked the obvious. Unfortunately, her statements caused on uproar by all the supporters on the fb group. The supporters, many of whom have donated money to the cause, were frustrated by the interviewee's answers. As you can see from the transcript, most answers were simple 'Good Question' responses or answers that conflict with other MSM reports.

The family is trying to increase the awareness of the case, but at the same time, they are getting extremely upset with the amount of questions being asked. Questions are inevitable with increased awareness, especially for this case. If the family wants to continue to increase this case's awareness and support, they have to be prepared to answer or at least acknowledge some of the tough questions being asked.

The above statements are of my opinion only.

I think it is silly for them to withhold information of them living together to avoid questions. Ridiculous to be playing such games when the life of a woman and the future of her son is on the line. They need to come out with the truth and why the searches were done at her home and on her property. They need to be outspoken about what LE suspects happened instead of playing along with deceit and cover-ups about her lifestyle or anything else that was going on at the time of her disappearance. It doesn't "muddy the water". The possibility exists for people with real information to misread the circumstances and puts at risk ever solving this case. They need the public on their side. LE needs to get it together and put some pressure on the person they believe is responsible for vanishing Peggy. They should stop playing around and get something done because of her child. If he could be in harm's way, LE and the family should make him their priority. Thank Goodness he was probably at school when this happened, but now they need to protect him. I don't see that happening here. As a matter of fact, I see nothing happening.

I don't trust that LE is the be-all and end-all in every situation. If they want to get the ball rolling in the right direction, maybe the family should be putting pressure on LE by speaking out and keeping Peggy's face and name out there. They need to stop hiding. It isn't bringing Peggy home.

 

[QueenBea13]

and used oh so often .......

Lots more than one would think...I had never heard of people actually doing this with pigs/hogs until it was a big deal on another MP case, Brandon Lawson, lots of people swear to this day wild hogs ate him, his clothes, his shoes, his phone, & even his keys...pigs/hogs can digest just about anything but from what I've read about them they cannot digest hair & or teeth, does anyone know if that is true or not?


The thoughts & opinions stated above are that, MY random thoughts & opinions.

 

[AmandaReckonwith]

Is the boyfriend related to/ or work with LE?

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Lots more than one would think...I had never heard of people actually doing this with pigs/hogs until it was a big deal on another MP case, Brandon Lawson, lots of people swear to this day wild hogs ate him, his clothes, his shoes, his phone, & even his keys...pigs/hogs can digest just about anything but from what I've read about them they cannot digest hair & or teeth, does anyone know if that is true or not?


The thoughts & opinions stated above are that, MY random thoughts & opinions.

It is possible to have happened in one case or maybe two, but it is not something we should even consider because it is such a remote possibility. So far, it doesn't apply in this case.

 

[PokeyMeansBusiness]

Is the boyfriend related to/ or work with LE?

I'm not sure on that one Amanda. I haven't seen any indication that he is related. I would figure that if he was, we would have heard about it by now.

 

[PokeyMeansBusiness]

Lots more than one would think...I had never heard of people actually doing this with pigs/hogs until it was a big deal on another MP case, Brandon Lawson, lots of people swear to this day wild hogs ate him, his clothes, his shoes, his phone, & even his keys...pigs/hogs can digest just about anything but from what I've read about them they cannot digest hair & or teeth, does anyone know if that is true or not?


The thoughts & opinions stated above are that, MY random thoughts & opinions.

I just thought about it after watching the movie Snatch. And the fact that Peggy and her boyfriend come from farming families.

I followed the Brandon Lawson case for a while. I personally don't believe wild hog ate him, but that is a whole other story.

I don't know if they can digest hair or teeth. What about bones? Can they digest bones?
*Edit: Just looked it up. Yes they can.

 

[Spiritecho]

My son in law lives in the upper part of Texas...we had a discussion while they were here for Christmas..he has personally seen the wild hogs reduce a deer carcass down to the antlers and some hide...everything else was devoured and what was left he said the coyotes and bugs got it. I am only answering the question asked about the hogs, I am not saying this is what happened to Peggy

 

[AmandaReckonwith]

I'm not sure on that one Amanda. I haven't seen any indication that he is related. I would figure that if he was, we would have heard about it by now.

I would agree, but we have not heard word one of him. Not his name, not his occupation, no news interviews pleading or hoping Peggy will be found. The only things we "know" are what we were able to see, here or maybe on facebook, before it was quickly deleted.

There are a lot of veiled references about "the truth coming out".

IMO and from all this, my speculation is that it was an abusive relationship.

 

[JnRyan]

I would agree, but we have not heard word one of him. Not his name, not his occupation, no news interviews pleading or hoping Peggy will be found. The only things we "know" are what we were able to see, here or maybe on facebook, before it was quickly deleted.

There are a lot of veiled references about "the truth coming out".

IMO and from all this, my speculation is that it was an abusive relationship.

And not much of anything coming out now. I just did a Google search and there are no more updates that I can find.

 

[BtgJULIEP]

I agree with this 100% - One thing we see is that families are at a COMPLETE LOSS when in this situation - the REALITY IS that the ones responsible for doing most of the searching (unless you have fame or celebrity) IS THE FAMILY. You guys seem very very smart about all this, and i'm sure you already know how m=bad it is but the family has to learn to be a search team - AND FAST. They have to learn to investigate and get resourceful and hope to heck they have enough common sense to problem solve their way through it -- I'd like to see the stats on how often its the family who locates the vehicles or worse in a case - What I would very much like to do is create a handbook - tips and tricks for the family to help them put their resources to work for them. I think you brilliant sleuths may be able to help me with this. I'm not gonna lie, I'm kinda blown away to see our team actually posted on here! You are very much on top of these, and I would like to talk to whoever I need to to possibly be able to get some private assistance on specific cases - is that out of line to request? - Thanks for all you guys do!! -- Julie Bridging the Gap

 

[pappa rob]

I agree with this 100% - One thing we see is that families are at a COMPLETE LOSS when in this situation - the REALITY IS that the ones responsible for doing most of the searching (unless you have fame or celebrity) IS THE FAMILY. You guys seem very very smart about all this, and i'm sure you already know how m=bad it is but the family has to learn to be a search team - AND FAST. They have to learn to investigate and get resourceful and hope to heck they have enough common sense to problem solve their way through it -- I'd like to see the stats on how often its the family who locates the vehicles or worse in a case - What I would very much like to do is create a handbook - tips and tricks for the family to help them put their resources to work for them. I think you brilliant sleuths may be able to help me with this. I'm not gonna lie, I'm kinda blown away to see our team actually posted on here! You are very much on top of these, and I would like to talk to whoever I need to to possibly be able to get some private assistance on specific cases - is that out of line to request? - Thanks for all you guys do!! -- Julie Bridging the Gap

I'd like to say welcome to the group, I'm not qualified to offer much help but you can find some here. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?188-Families-of-the-Missing-Resources-helps-tips

 

[Vail]

I agree with this 100% - One thing we see is that families are at a COMPLETE LOSS when in this situation - the REALITY IS that the ones responsible for doing most of the searching (unless you have fame or celebrity) IS THE FAMILY. You guys seem very very smart about all this, and i'm sure you already know how m=bad it is but the family has to learn to be a search team - AND FAST. They have to learn to investigate and get resourceful and hope to heck they have enough common sense to problem solve their way through it -- I'd like to see the stats on how often its the family who locates the vehicles or worse in a case - What I would very much like to do is create a handbook - tips and tricks for the family to help them put their resources to work for them. I think you brilliant sleuths may be able to help me with this. I'm not gonna lie, I'm kinda blown away to see our team actually posted on here! You are very much on top of these, and I would like to talk to whoever I need to to possibly be able to get some private assistance on specific cases - is that out of line to request? - Thanks for all you guys do!! -- Julie Bridging the Gap

The NCMEC has some great info to get you started. While it focuses on kids, it can be applied to anyone.http://www.missingkids.com/Families

Also here is the guideline for LE to give you some insight on how things are handled by them: http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/publications/NC74.pdf

Sadly there is not such an easy handbook on how to locate the deceased, as it depends on the victim and suspect. In my experience, the family is rarely the one to find anything, as they are often discouraged from being involved in searches by LE.

 

[borndem]

I agree with this 100% - One thing we see is that families are at a COMPLETE LOSS when in this situation - the REALITY IS that the ones responsible for doing most of the searching (unless you have fame or celebrity) IS THE FAMILY. You guys seem very very smart about all this, and i'm sure you already know how m=bad it is but the family has to learn to be a search team - AND FAST. They have to learn to ivestigate and get resourceful and hope to heck they have enough common sense to problem solve their way through it -- I'd like to see the stats on how often its the family who locates the vehicles or worse in a case - What I would very much like to do is create a handbook - tips and tricks for the family to help them put their resources to work for them. I think you brilliant sleuths may be able to help me with this. I'm not gonna lie, I'm kinda blown away to see our team actually posted on here! You are very much on top of these, and I would like to talk to whoever I need to to possibly be able to get some private assistance on specific cases - is that out of line to request? - Thanks for all you guys do!! -- Julie Bridging the Gap

Just taking a minute to say,

:welcome6:

to

:sleuth:Websleuths,:sleuth:

:cheer:BtgJULIEP !!:cheer:

:happydance:We're glad you're here!!:happydance:


:justice:
​