OK OK - Sharon Marshall, 20, multiple aliases, OKC, 1990 - ID'd as Suzanne Sevakis - #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
well atleast they cant worry he will do that now.....

I hope sharons daughter is safe from the knowledge of who HE is. Isnt she the one that was suppossedly adopted by a doctor and his wife?
 
i belive the girl he adopted out holds the key on the dna issue there is speculation that the dna on file may not be sharons well i think once and for all the girl should be tested how old is she now? what if one day she wants to find her mother and then finds out a sick crazy man named floyd killed her. i wish u could give floyd some kinda drug where he could let all the secrets out? he needs to speak before he dies
 
i very much agree with you smile.....i think that on his last hour he will speak but it will only be with more riddles. i dont hold my breath that he will say much.
 
ragland said:
good plan, lets move on please.

I think the last question was something about sharons daughter in LA??? if im correct, for some reason i thought she lived elsewhere but im not sure. can anyone confirm or deny?
Like you I don't recall her as being in CA. I thought it was TX. But my memory is not that great with so many details of this case. Some one on here had tracked her down but of course was not going to make contact. I am curious like you if anyone does know for sure where she lived.
 
becba, when i typed LA i meant the abbreviation for Louisianna......not Los Angeles....sorry for the confusion but seems texas was where i thought she was as well......
 
does she know she was even adopted? i knew someone who adopted a child and were not planning on telling her she was adopted. i think they were waiting untill she was an adult. how old is the girl that floyd gave up? what if she is an avid reader and has already read A beautifull child but has not made the connection that sharon is her mother
 
I have done a search on Sharon and can't find any sites/boards on her. Anyone have any help they can offer or hints. I guess her name is common so you get alot of irrelevant stuff.
 
2sisters said:
If they are important enough then they will come out in time though, right?
Itsreenw, I hope you did not misunderstand me, this wasn't meant to be argumantative or anything. I was just asking, if it is important then it will come out. I meant nothing by it.
 
smile22 said:
i belive the girl he adopted out holds the key on the dna issue there is speculation that the dna on file may not be sharons well i think once and for all the girl should be tested how old is she now? what if one day she wants to find her mother and then finds out a sick crazy man named floyd killed her. i wish u could give floyd some kinda drug where he could let all the secrets out? he needs to speak before he dies

I think going to Sharon's birth daughter is not in the best intrest of this girl.
It is certanilty not for society to seek her out for this purpose.
There is another choice and that is to exume Sharon's body and get a fresh DNA sample. Since the sample they had is alledgedly old, degraded, and possibly not even Sharon's it seems reason enough to exume her body and get a sample. I know people have even offered to pay for the exuming. However, the people in change have refused to do it. This is not just about Sharon's ID anymore but about several missing children's families who have a right to know if this is there child.

mjak
 
2sisters said:
I have done a search on Sharon and can't find any sites/boards on her. Anyone have any help they can offer or hints. I guess her name is common so you get alot of irrelevant stuff.
I used Google as my search engine the other day and I was able to find some new message boards out there. WS's opened my eyes to this case and I only hope for Sharon to be known for who she really was, and for her family to know where she is now. There is an author by the same name, but seaching through several pages may help you find the different perspectives you seek?

It is a shame that all of us here, with the same goal in finding Sharon's true identity could unite as a group without infighting, but that happens sometimes. I respect the opinions of all of you and I would like to say that I feel that mjak is most likely right, "Sharon's" birthdaughter may not be the best "inroad" for determining "Sharon's" real identity. Whoever she is, she deserves the respect of not knowing some things? I believe a new blood sample may be the best way to go. It would give an absolute sample to use versus the blood sample that may not be "Sharon's". I really don't think that
any of us have any right to search out or seek the daughter and violate her rights. Does anyone out there know how we can band together and perhaps help along a process that can allow Sharon's daughter to be left alone AND get "the powers that be" to exhume the body for an accurate DNA/blood sample? I guess paying for it isn't enough, but is there a way to rally together as a group to get this case solved?
 
The reason why I was asking about Sharon's daughter's age, was not to contact her. I was wondering if she is old enough, if her parents have told her already. If it were my adoptive daughter, I would make darn sure she knew who Franklin Delano Floyd is and what he looks like. Also some adoptive families tell their adopted children that they are adopted. Additionally, if she weren't told, she may find out by accident somehow. The question was, just what it was, how old is she ?? Just wondered if she might herself be looking for her mother's identity.
 
i wouldnt want to just randomly go up to the girl and tell her we need your dna i was just exploring all options to get a true sample of the dna i wonder if when michael was tested negative against floyd if his dna was used to compare sharons does anyone know if that was ever looked into and if any paper trails exsist
 
Boyz_Mum said:
I Does anyone out there know how we can band together and perhaps help along a process that can allow Sharon's daughter to be left alone AND get "the powers that be" to exhume the body for an accurate DNA/blood sample? I guess paying for it isn't enough, but is there a way to rally together as a group to get this case solved?
I think at this point the only thing I can think of is starting somekind of petition and getting the media or someone like Greta or Nancy Grace on board to push and push for the exhuming to be done. Count me in for any ideas you have.

mjak
 
i could always take the petition i have for dateline to air sharons story. i could just create a new one with the same info but adding the exhumination of sharons body to get a true sample of her blood but i think the key is to find out how they tested michael against floyd and if court documents still exsist i know when floyd was going to court to petition them for custody of michael they wanted a test to see if they were related wouldnt that info also be able to be used against sharon to see if it would match up with the sample of blood they have on hand
 
IF they did mitochondrial DNA testing on MIchael ( this is passed down from mother) then yes this would work to match to potential Id's for Sharon if compared to mitocondrial DNA of the mothers of the missing children who are potential matches. So yes, we should find out if this was done and if the DNA profile is still available. I can't believe that NCMEC has not done this allready.

mjak
 
poppypetals said:
The reason why I was asking about Sharon's daughter's age, was not to contact her. I was wondering if she is old enough, if her parents have told her already. If it were my adoptive daughter, I would make darn sure she knew who Franklin Delano Floyd is and what he looks like. Also some adoptive families tell their adopted children that they are adopted. Additionally, if she weren't told, she may find out by accident somehow. The question was, just what it was, how old is she ?? Just wondered if she might herself be looking for her mother's identity.
I hope you didn't think I was being critical of your wondering about Sharon's birthdaughter, I wasn't trying to be that way. Sorry if I came across that way! I almost think that if she were looking for her mother she would have a good chance of running across some of these boards as we have? (I am not a very bold sluether!)
 
smile22 said:
i could always take the petition i have for dateline to air sharons story. i could just create a new one with the same info but adding the exhumination of sharons body to get a true sample of her blood but i think the key is to find out how they tested michael against floyd and if court documents still exsist i know when floyd was going to court to petition them for custody of michael they wanted a test to see if they were related wouldnt that info also be able to be used against sharon to see if it would match up with the sample of blood they have on hand
I once saw a petition online for dateline, is your's the one that was posted here sometime ago? If you created a new one- or one with additional information, do you think there is enough interest in this case to get a network to do something? The court tv story on the case didn't really seem like it focused on who Sharon was- more about FDF. I guess I would have liked it to have been more about Sharon.
 
mjak said:
IF they did mitochondrial DNA testing on MIchael ( this is passed down from mother) then yes this would work to match to potential Id's for Sharon if compared to mitocondrial DNA of the mothers of the missing children who are potential matches. So yes, we should find out if this was done and if the DNA profile is still available. I can't believe that NCMEC has not done this allready.

mjak
mjak, I don't know very much about mito-DNA or DNA at all. I wonder if the NCMEC crosschecked the DNA from Sharon with that of Michael at anytime? I am sure if they did, I could read back and find that answer in the earlier threads. I am left to wonder if during FDF's paternity test and the DNA to prove he wasn't Michael's bio father, would it be legal to use any of the DNA in that case to be used in determining Sharon's possible identity? (I am sorry if that is confusing, I have trouble typing and making sense at the same time!)
 
Boyz_Mum said:
I hope you didn't think I was being critical of your wondering about Sharon's birthdaughter, I wasn't trying to be that way. Sorry if I came across that way! I almost think that if she were looking for her mother she would have a good chance of running across some of these boards as we have? (I am not a very bold sluether!)

No, not at all BM, I was just trying to clarify that my intentions were not to contact Sharon's daughter, but just that I was merely wondering. As if we could find her anyways, that would be like finding Atlantis.
 
Poppypetals:

There used to be someone on this site that would've been bold enough to contact Floyd's daughter, but she was banned :( ...but I also think it would be like finding a needle in a haystack. I don't think the adoption was legal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
202
Guests online
674
Total visitors
876

Forum statistics

Threads
625,671
Messages
18,508,150
Members
240,832
Latest member
jonnyd3388
Back
Top