waltzingmatilda
Verified Insider-Roy Moore
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,718
- Reaction score
- 722
In a heavily discussed case such as this, it sometimes is helpful to go back and re-read some of the early posts. Sometimes things get overlooked or did not seem important at the time that later are.
I was looking at the early posts in the original thread. There is a long article that was pasted I believe from the World Herald early right after the killings. In that article it is alleged that wittnesses saw the POI on the front porch of the Hunter home. It still doesnt say anyone saw him enter but this sounds at least like we may have been correct in thinking someone let him in via the front door. Given what we know from Shirlee's family this would fit with her not leaving the back door open or unlocked.
It would also lead me to think that the perp was there to see Tom, not Shirlee. Also the article refers to 'multiple' wounds to the victim's necks. This was a detail I'd not noted before. Sounds a bit less like the clinical crime scene some had spoken of.
Snick1946, I tend to agree with you. The murderer had the whole day to try and gain entry into the Hunter home but he waited until Tom returned home from school. Why? Did this person know somehow that Shirlee would not answer the door but Tom would?
What little evidence we have points toward Tom either being the intended target or.....his presence being used by the perp to gain entry into the home. but , since there was no burglary committed, what would be the point of that?
Thanks for noting the 'multiple wounds to the victims necks'. Thinking back to my teaching days, what is the difination of 'multiple'?......multiples of 2?
5?.....10? Sure wish we had more info.
My intentions of this post are in no way meant as disrepectful to Tom.
MOO
wm