waltzingmatilda
Verified Insider-Roy Moore
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2008
- Messages
- 6,718
- Reaction score
- 723
~above BBM..respectfully~I think this is really interesting, and we should do some digging:
1. Someone told either Tom or Shirlee that a person was coming… told by whom? The Hunter family? Brothers or Parents. Shirlee's friends or colleagues. Would not have been hard to find the address for Hunters online, but much harder to target her there unless she had personally given the address to someone. That makes me wonder about her being the target at all.
2. The reward. My understanding is that the reward was half put up by "anonymous" donors, and half by Shirlee's family. Note that this is the Crimestoppers reward program, not the Police or Families. The family or families contribute to the Crimestoppers fund. Who were those anonymous donors. Would a reward really help if it was a hired killer? If it was some disgruntled medical professional or student? I guess it would if it were drug related, but does anyone believe that this was drug related? Perhaps drugs at Tom's school? Or with Shirlee? Don't quite fit for me, but you never know.
3. We haven't heard much about the clearing of anyone, unfortunately. I personally would like to hear more about the immediate family and those connections. Obviously the Police probably went there first, but perhaps it's taking longer to clear the immediate family. But two years?
Just my two cents.
thesaint, Your posts are thought provoking and I don't wish you to think your thoughts and contributions have gone unnoticed.
Omaha has a news article on his site (my apologies for not having the link readily available but Snick had it linked in a post 2, 3, or 4 pages back, or maybe Omaha will be kind enough to link for us as it is the most complete compilation of media articles that I have seen so far) which states that Dr. William Hunter is not a suspect. Sorry, I can't remember if this came directly from Le or is just a reporters perspective.
Regarding the reward....would the Freedom of Information Act assist us in learning the the identities of the anonymous donors or NO? I am curious why the Sherman family contributed to the reward fund but not the Hunter family. The Dr's Hunter, well I have no idea of their joint annual income, but I think it is probably more than most of us imagine. Why no contribution?
I don't really feel reward money would be an incentive for a hired killer to come forward. Nor do I expect the killer would confide in anyone if this is his 'job' for which he was hired. JMO.
Any ideas where to go from here?
wm