I lost the feed, are you all still getting it?
On the mark, SG -- Just what I had been thinking all along -- that would be the ONLY reason he would have cleaned up anything -- making the garage have enough room for a car for just a short time. I just don't see him doing any work around the house -- and it is a bit understandable since he is the one going to work each day. "Her" jobs and "his" jobs.... and ne'er the twain shall meet .... except when it comes to post-homicide time, then it's clean, clean, hide, clean, vacuum, wipe, etc., etc. Quite the housekeeper, IMO. :maddening:
Sorry you guys, did I miss anything from the man who found her?
Thanks Skittles, that one is working better. Who is testifying?
Not unexpected considering yesterday's luke warm performance, based on the openings alone, the defense hit it out of the park. Of course the evidence that unfolds is what counts. I still think Brad is guilty, but I now have my doubts there will be a conviction. I think some jurors will hang on some reasonable doubt. Sure hope the state has the smoking gun hidden somewhere.ok by me, I haven't really been able to foloow much. Supposed to be working also.
It doesn't look like she is wearing a necklace in this picture.
Well, you are right.
However, this pic was taken the summer of 2007.
Nancy bought the necklace 11/2007![]()
I'm quite surprised they didn't mention her necklace during opening statements. This is huge, IMHO. Nancy was known to never take off that necklace...ever. And it was found in a desk (possibly Brad's desk) inside the residence. It was something she would have worn at the party the night before and probably seen/noticed at least by a few women there (we women notice such things). That they didn't even bring it up has me wondering why.
They sure didn't cover much in their opening...it was much more brief than I expected it would be. All of 30 or 40 min.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.