- Joined
- Apr 25, 2018
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 320
I live in a Josephine county. Wonder if the local papers would have anything archived that could give more information about her disappearance. Will check and post a follow up
How terrible she has been missing for a longer time than she has appeared .. I hope that one day it will be known what happened to herCindy has been missing for 44 years today.
I couldn't find any archived mention of Cindy's disappearance online, and COVID interrupted my ability to snoop at the local libraries and whatnot to see if any hard copies of past editions of local papers exist from around that time... but that doesn't mean I'm giving up on this one. Josephine County has a pretty large amount of missing people despite the fact that it's a relatively small area. Somebody out here has to remember her.There is not much out there on Cindy. I did come across a 1978 newspaper clipping posted in Los Angeles.
View attachment 300865
Don’t believe this is her.One interesting question is 'how many Cindy Irene King's' lived in the NW? I ask the question because I am attaching a picture of a marriage record from 1999 between Cindy Irene King and Matthew Wayne Miller, both of Grays Harbour. It comes from Ancestry and is indisputable as it is the original certificate. I cannot explain it except if there was a second Cindy Irene King in the same wider area, and I cannot find a record for another.View attachment 355155
I think it's worth submitting as a potential match.Cindy has 21 UP exclusions but UP13916 is not one of them. Found almost a year later in CA. She is within estimated age range and interesting that the ME noted “large teeth”, which is a unique trait on Cindy as well.
physical characteristic
Large front teeth [from photo at time of discovery]
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.www.namus.gov
Thank you. I went ahead and submitted for review this morning.I think it's worth submitting as a potential match.
Actually, I submitted this via the Doe Network in June and got a reply a week or so ago, kept meaning to update.Cindy has 21 UP exclusions but UP13916 is not one of them. Found almost a year later in CA. She is within estimated age range and interesting that the ME noted “large teeth”, which is a unique trait on Cindy as well.
physical characteristic
Large front teeth [from photo at time of discovery]
The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)
By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.www.namus.gov
Oh ok, good to know. Hopefully, this exclusion will be updated with NamUs soon.Actually, I submitted this via the Doe Network in June and got a reply a week or so ago, kept meaning to update.