Resolved OR - Clackamas Co., WhtFem UP14723, 14-25, partial skeletal remains, Nov'91 - Name withheld

Romulus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2015
Messages
3,652
Reaction score
5,688
NamUs UP 14723

https://identifyus.org/en/cases/14723

Unidentified White Female

Found November 16, 1991 in Clackamas County, OR
Body Condition:
Not recognizable - Partial skeletal parts only
Probable year of death: to

Vital Statistics
Estimated age: 14-25
Approximate Height: cannot estimate
Approximate Weight: cannot estimate.
Hair Color: Unknown
Eye Color: Unknown
Scars and marks: nothing
Clothing & Accessories

Clothing: Nothing
Jewerly: Nothing.
Footwear: nothing
Accessories: Nothing

Identifiers
Fingerprints: Fingerprint not available
Dentals: Dental information / charting is available and entered
DNA:
Sample submitted - Tests complete

Case History:
Cranium and mandible of a young Caucasian female were discovered.
 
Clackamas county is really large and it looks like whoever logged it into Namus didn't give much more details, but at least it appears that her DNA was put into CODIS, so that's a good start.
 
I just wanted to be sure to avoid sending them duplicate submissions. Since you didn't I submitted them both.
 
The Clackamas County Sheriff’s Office has a nice detailed Cold Cases page but unfortunately this case doesn’t seem to be listed there.
http://www.clackamas.us/sheriff/coldcases.html#1990s


I wonder if this case could be connected to Eldridge Broussard Jr. a pastor in the area who was indicted in the murder of his daughter and keeping child sex slaves. http://articles.latimes.com/1991-09-06/news/mn-1749_1_cult-leader-broussard
https://www.upi.com/Archives/1991/0...sed-as-slave-master-found-dead/2203684043200/
http://murderpedia.org/male.B/b/broussard-eldridge.htm

Surprisingly he doesn’t seem to have a thread.
 
Too late to edit... it appears that the children may have not necessarily been sex slaves but more labor slaves. I got excited when I saw a connection in the timeframe and location and that this Doe is relatively young. Just wanted to clarify.
 
Is anyone else getting an error on this girl's NamUs page now? I'm hoping that that's a good sign.....
 
Maybe one of this female missing is the match?

I'm just hoping that she's been identified, almost 26 full years is too long to be nameless. If it was one that I sent in, this would be my first match (with possibly a second currently in the works).
 
Have a minor update: I contacted the regional administrator for information about this case and while she said she couldn't comment on cases that are not publicly viewable in NamUs (ie whether this UID has been identified or not) she could tell me that my most recent submissions did not played a role in the profile being removed. Hopefully we'll know more soon.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
163
Guests online
450
Total visitors
613

Forum statistics

Threads
625,573
Messages
18,506,408
Members
240,817
Latest member
chalise
Back
Top