I've never heard of it but I guess it certainly makes sense when a person is attempting to qualify for benefits and insurance--or a fancy house makeover. That's why contact numbers are always asked for. You have to wonder how many times these reports are thoroughly checked.
That could certainly be the reason these reports were not accepted as evidence in Oregon. However, if Oregon realized or proved that they were bogus, I'd think that the Cerdas would be facing charges of forgery. I always wondered why the judge would not allow them in.
Something that I simply cannot ignore is that there have been some comments under the earlier articles that Terri told a number of people that the girls were not their biological children. Why would she do this if it weren't true? And if they aren't her biological children, why would she have the same disease? They certainly look as if they could be children by birth, but who knows?
The reason this really bothers me is that my background is in adoption subsidy/post placement service advocacy. If these girls were adopted from the system, they'd qualify for very high "specialized" subsidies and services, in addition to their parents' insurance, if these medical conditions were truly present. If they were adopted privately, however, they would not qualify. It's a federal program managed at the state level for special needs or hard to place children.
A number of adoptive mothers (including the three I've known), who have suspected MBP, have greatly exaggerated their adopted children's very real illnesses. Two specifically adopted only very fragile children but then went on to exacerbate the problems to a great degree--literally living at the hospitals and talking to no one except doctors.
I've read nothing about the girls before they were four and six and it would seem to me that these children would have been showing symptoms from birth if either of these diseases is present. Terri would have been in her 40s when the girls were born.
That could certainly be the reason these reports were not accepted as evidence in Oregon. However, if Oregon realized or proved that they were bogus, I'd think that the Cerdas would be facing charges of forgery. I always wondered why the judge would not allow them in.
Something that I simply cannot ignore is that there have been some comments under the earlier articles that Terri told a number of people that the girls were not their biological children. Why would she do this if it weren't true? And if they aren't her biological children, why would she have the same disease? They certainly look as if they could be children by birth, but who knows?
The reason this really bothers me is that my background is in adoption subsidy/post placement service advocacy. If these girls were adopted from the system, they'd qualify for very high "specialized" subsidies and services, in addition to their parents' insurance, if these medical conditions were truly present. If they were adopted privately, however, they would not qualify. It's a federal program managed at the state level for special needs or hard to place children.
A number of adoptive mothers (including the three I've known), who have suspected MBP, have greatly exaggerated their adopted children's very real illnesses. Two specifically adopted only very fragile children but then went on to exacerbate the problems to a great degree--literally living at the hospitals and talking to no one except doctors.
I've read nothing about the girls before they were four and six and it would seem to me that these children would have been showing symptoms from birth if either of these diseases is present. Terri would have been in her 40s when the girls were born.