Well considering the LE pdf states he was at Leah's friend house at 10.15 , had a conversation ,then rang Cory , then was back in town to be pulled over at 10.30 , i just can't see he had enough time to swap cars after 10.15..So my moneys on him having the Mustang by the time he returned to Leah's friends...
Why go to that effort to swap cars , when you only end up using the car you swap into for hmmmm 30 mins?? It seems pointless , unless i'm missing something...
Well considering the LE pdf states he was at Leah's friend house at 10.15 , had a conversation ,then rang Cory , then was back in town to be pulled over at 10.30 , i just can't see he had enough time to swap cars after 10.15..So my moneys on him having the Mustang by the time he returned to Leah's friends...
Why go to that effort to swap cars , when you only end up using the car you swap into for hmmmm 30 mins?? It seems pointless , unless i'm missing something...
I think it had a very definate point as to why he changed cars, esp. considering what his state of mind would have been, freaking out & "RUSHING" like never before/since- IF "he dunnit". (isn't that so?) I also suspect there's good plausible "psychological/subliminal" reason why the friend/mom don't recall what car he came back in. (cuz they didn't see one?)not to tease you, but when the time is right i'll love to elaborate so you'll see what you're missing.
I bet forensic hypnosis could corroborate that, among TOO MANY other things in this one. The "devil's in the details", but i don't believe ALL the details are in the devil on this. not anymore anyways. i think valuable info is right there for the proper "picking", if ONLY LE would start over,...not just reading the files now... but re-DOING the whole shebang from square 1.
I'd be re-interviewing EVERYONE (done by outside expert forensic interviewer/psychologist/hypnotist -ALL OF THE ABOVE-) who could remotely possibly have seen or even heard ANYTHING, even from inside a nearby house. Did they "think" maybe they heard something then decided it was just the TV? Did their dog suddenly bark and/or whine at something they couldn't hear, such as a distant scream? Dogs are ultra-sensitive to sensed aggressiveness or pain, & respond differently than to other things. Did somebody out & about see/hear "something" that seemed so innocuous to them they didn't report it, but is a "missing link". Did a then "too young to take seriously" kid tell parents he saw something while riding his bike that was 'dismissed' by them? Somebody who didn't want to get involved, but may now if politely approached? etc. & so on, SOMETHING to pin the tail on the donkey.
assuming there's a lack of physical forensics, eyewitnesses, & "in the know" informants...doesn't mean there's NO proof. "beyond a REASONABLE doubt". the smaller that timeline gets, the tighter the noose IMO. despite the fact that a tight window leaves less time to "explain away", the car switcharoos & lies about it squash credibility already. As do the "invisible man" hours afterwards, & prove "BARD" this a VERY "suspiciously busy" boy all of sudden after "kicking it" all day, & who then goes UNSEEN for hours while allegedly "searching"..(This is certainly NOT acting "reasonably" as it were). not PROOF, no, but then WHEN that "link" appears all these years later, Kaboom, boxed in tighter than a convicted killer in a 6x10 cell!!!
PS- has a "wrongful death" suit ever been considered? not for sure, but think maybe defendant can be forced to testify in those? regardless, the burden of proof is less. not that it's any consolation or acceptable as the only outcome, but it's SOMETHING, no? sure make life miserable meantime. {just wondering what thoughts are out there on that}
ok- enough for now, just trying to catch up & hopefully rejuvenate the nice little collaboration here. PEACE
