jubie
Former Member
winteryns said:
This link doesn't work for me, what have you found?
winteryns said:
That's right, Amish in the City. Thank you, I was going nuts trying to come u with it. I have thought about those young people for years. Not just the amish kids but the others also. I wonder if the experience changed their lives in any way?winteryns said:The show was called "Amish in the City". I watched it..lol
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:reb said:yeah, but how can you prevent it in the first place?? this guy was said to be a great husband/father, no history of psychiatric problems or criminal behavior (well, except for the molesting which he never had to answer for apparently). for career criminals & perverts, OK- that's an easy one. but what about cases like this? or kids who go blow up their school?? i'm just wondering how kids- and people in general- are supposed to protect themselves when there so many nutcases out there, whether they have acted out yet or not.
and how come we never hear about a lone gunman or a child molester who gets taken out with a well-aimed shot BEFORE he hurts anyone else?? that would really make my day. if it gets to the point where children can't even be in school, on the street, or in their own homes without the danger of being kidnapped or killed, then how else are they supposed to protect thesmelves??
as for america being a tougher nation-- i am starting to have serious doubts that will ever happen. we are too obsessed with the idea of "freedom"-- which apparently includes a whole lot of freedom for criminals. we don't want to instill punishment that's too harsh on criminals because-- well, that would be infringing on their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. we always err on the side of innocence- i.e., we'd rather let 1000 murderers go than risk killing one innocent man (in theory anyway). america would have to take a cold hard look at itself,, and take a big step away from something that is at the very core of our being. we view tough laws and punishments like something that happens "over there" in some totalitarian country... and we're afraid of that. we like to see ourselves as just and fair, but we end up being too soft and then the criminals end up with more freedom than the law-abiding citizens. i am beginning to wonder who's side our government is on (well, actually i've been wondering that for a long time!)
i know that mob justice is for uncivilized nations and that's not 'playing by the rules'- and there's a REASON we have those rules. but i'm getting more & more frustrated with the way things are by the day.
what will it take to enact a law that puts murderers (unless reasonable self-defense), child molesters, violent rapists to death- and not 10 years from now? and WHY is that such a bad idea?? will our society really be at a loss if those people were gone? and WHY does our society coddle and glorify criminals so much, and make heroes & martyrs out of them? what is wrong with us........???????
Snip...The victims were identified as Naomi Rose Ebersole, 7; Anna Mae Stoltzfus, 12; Marian Fisher, 13; Mary Liz Miller, 8; and her sister Lena Miller, 7. Stoltzfus' sister was among the wounded.scandi said:Oh Reb, my dear that would be insanity for children to pack heat! :crazy: Not that the insane problem in fron of our society now doesn't need to make swift moves to squash it though.. There just has to be a better way to do it.
It is suppose to be the job of parents and teachers to instill all the ethics, moral value and correct obligations of the citizenry in America.That evidently is not working as there is no control - the human mind is too complicated to simply program into always doing the right thing.
Therefore a solution has to be reflected in tougher laws, mandatory sentances and have more of the punishment fit the crime. I don't know how to accomplish the last one, short of automatic casatration for any man found guilty of a sex crime.
The country has recently made some inroads into controling sexual predators who are found guilty, but we need to keep a clean house. Maybe this Mark Foley ordeal is a blessing in disguise. When you have to warn the pages in the Congress that a congressman is a homosexual and you better watch out, and when you don't dare report that a major US Senator lets his stewards hold pot parties in his office after work for the pages, there is a lot of cleaning to do!
Scandi
PS: I heard there are 7 families directly impacted by the shooting of the 10 liitle girls. I thought there were 11 girls shot. Does anyone know for sure?
bakerprune64 said:Snip...The victims were identified as Naomi Rose Ebersole, 7; Anna Mae Stoltzfus, 12; Marian Fisher, 13; Mary Liz Miller, 8; and her sister Lena Miller, 7. Stoltzfus' sister was among the wounded.
Four other girls were in critical condition and one was in serious condition. They ranged in age from 6 to 13.
*********************The article also said that one girl slipped out of the school house with the boys and was unharmed. That might account for the 11 girls number you have.
bing1 said:Two or three years ago there was a television show that focused on the Rumspringa. I can't remember the name of it at the moment but it was a reality show that took 6 or 7 amish teens and put them in a big nice house with 6 or 7 non amish teens from all walks of life. They showed the amish teens everything from Christian rock shows to gay bars. At the end of the series the amish teens had to decide whether they wanted to go back or not. Two decided not to even though it meant that they would never see any of their family members ever again. That is basically the decision they have to make. A life in the world with no contact or to live with their loved ones in the community. I found the show fascinating and really felt for those teens who had to make this huge decision.
As for the monster who did this I think that he did pick this school because it was convinient and he would have more time to do what he was going to do before police were involved. He was most likely molested at the age of 12 or so and then began molesting later. He probably struggled with the images and dreams he had been having and for a very long time fought those feelings and tried to suppress them. He didn't expect the police to be there as fast as they were and that pushed up his plans. I think all along he had planned to molest those girls and then kill them and himself. These dreams and thoughts had been with him for a very long time and I think he decided to give in to them one last time and then end it so it could never happen again. Just my opinion of course. I pray that these families heal quickly and find the comfort from God that they have always depended on to get them through.
Wow, I'm just crying. What a powerful article. I feel so bad for these simple, peaceful people.Sassygerl said:Interesting article...
UNDER their wide-brimmed straw hats and behind their distinctive beards, there was not a twitch of emotion or a single expression of grief yesterday as their horse-drawn buggies made their way down the narrow stone lanes and through the cornfields of Nickel Mines.
Down the hill, in a beautiful gully filled with the smell of wild garlic, stood the one-room schoolhouse where ten of their little girls, feet and hands tied, had been lined up against a blackboard and shot through the head less then 24 hours before.
But in this hamlet of 27 homes and one church, there were no pictures of the victims to see yesterday the Amish forbid photography. There were no relatives weeping to camera, describing their grief. There were no publicity agents lining up interviews with Oprah Winfrey, or family spokesmen releasing names. There was nothing except a quiet, but enormously powerful, public stoicism.
America has had school massacres before, but never an aftermath as uniquely strange as this one.
more at link...
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2387829,00.html